RE-PUBLISHING : “THE ABSOLUTE LAST WORD ON THE SHIRLEY SHERROD ISSUES”, BY DAWN NARET’
INTRO BY DAWN NARET’:
“AS MANY OF YOU KNOW, I MAINTAIN 2 SITES ON FACEBOOK.COM, WHERE I MEET NEW, INTERESTING PEOPLE AND HAVE THE
OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR NEW, INTERESTING OPINIONS, FROM THIS WELL VARIED GROUP. TODAY, JULY 21, 2010, WE OPENED A VERY
LONG DISCOURSE ON THE MS. SHIRLEY SHERROD ISSUES. SOME WERE FLIP OR BORED AT THE SUBJECT MATTER AND SOME WERE VERY
INTELLIGENT COMMENTS, BUT WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL BASIS NAMING. I CHOSE THE BANTER BETWEEN MYSELF AND 2 FAVORITE”……
** (THE AUTHORING, FROM THIS POIUNT ON, UNTIL THE END OF THIS INTRO, WAS STOLEN – I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO REPEAT THE
EXACT HUMOR IT CONTAINED, BUT I WILL TRY.)
“I CHOSE THE BANTER BETWEEN MYSELF AND 2 FAVORITE MALE-NEARLY HUMAN, REPRESENTATIVES OF THE SPECIES, TO POST HERE.
YOU WILL NOTICE THAT THE 2 MEN DO NOT GET A CHANCE TO SAY MUCH, WHICH IS MY USUAL PRACTICE……TO JUST GO LONG,
UNTIL THEY TIRE TO THE POINT OF FORGETTING THE POINT AND THEN SLAM DUNK THEM WITH A BOTTOM LINE. THIS IS ALL SAID IN
JEST……PLEASE TO TAKE IT AS SUCH.
FIRST, A BIT OF BACKGROUND, ON THE ISSUES. MS. SHERROD WAS RECENTLY ASKED, BY A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE,
TO RESIGN HER POST WITH THE DEPT OF AGRICULTURE.THE REQUEST CAME ON THE HEELS OF A VIDEO RELEASED BY THE TEA-PARTY,
AS THEIR EVIDENCE THAT RACIAL BIAS EXISTS IN THE NAACP. THE NAACP HAD ALREADY MADE THIS ACCUSATION AGAINST THE
TEA-PARTY AND THE VIDEO WAS THEIR REBUTTAL. THE VIDEO SHOWED MS. SHERROD SPEAKING TO A NAACP AUDIENCE ON A PAST
EXPERIENCE, WHILE SHE WAS WORKING WITH U.S. FARMERS SEEKING GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL AID.
MS. SHERROD COMPLAINED THAT THE VIDEO WAS ONLY APORTION OF HER COMMENTARY AND WAS TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT.SO, SHE
CLARIFIED THE FULL CONTEXT AND INCRIMINATED HERSELF FURTHER.
QUOTE CBS NEWS : “Sherrod has said the video excerpt did not include the full story of her relationship with the
farmer, with whom she says she became friends after helping him avoid foreclosure.
Nevertheless, Sherrod says the White House pressed for her resignation.
Earlier today, Vilsack released a statement saying he had accepted Sherrod’s resignation, and added that the
department has no tolerance for discrimination.
This afternoon, Vilsack released another statement saying he asked for Sherrod’s resignation.
“First, for the past 18 months, we have been working to turn the page on the sordid civil rights record at USDA and
this controversy could make it more difficult to move forward on correcting injustices,” Vilsack said. “Second,
state rural development directors make many decisions and are often called to use their discretion. The controversy
surrounding her comments would create situations where her decisions, rightly or wrongly, would be called into
question making it difficult for her to bring jobs to Georgia.”
A White House official told CBS News that the White House did not pressure Sherrod or the Department, contrary to
Sherrod’s claims.” – END QUOTE/ CBS NEWS/END OF INTRO, BY DAWN NARET’
*******************************************************************************
AND NOW FOR THE FACEBOOK.COM BANTER OF OPINIONS:
AL W. – What happened to Shirley Sherrod was wrong.
AUNT DAWN – I present the lady’s own words, discussing to a laughing naacp audiance, her action toward a white
farmer facing bankruptcy……………..”He had to come to me for help. What he didn’t know while he was taking all
that time trying to show me he was superior to me was I was trying to decide just how much help I was going to give
him,” she said. “I … See Morewas struggling with the fact that so many black people have lost their farmland and
here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land — so I didn’t give him the full force of what I
could do. I did enough.”………GUILTY ! AS CHARGED – HATS OFF TO THE NON-PREJUDICE SUPERIORS OF OBAMANATION EXEC.
DIRECTORS !
**********************
AUNT DAWN – IN WHO’S MIND WAS THE BLACK AND WHITE DIVISION/ CONSIDERATION FACTOR ? THESE “OFF THE PATH OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS”, BAND OF POWER MONGER BLACKS ARE HOLDING AND CREATING PREJUDICE. THEY HAVE GONE ASTRAY FROM BOTH
THEIR ABILITY AND THEIR LOYALITY TO AN EQUAL RIGHTS SOCIETY ! I HELPED PUT THEM IN THAT EXAULTED POSITION OF
OPPORTUNITY……..AND I’LL HELP … See MorePRESIDENT OBAMA TO TAKE THEM OUT BECAUSE OF THEIR PREJUDICE AND
DISLOYALITY TO THE PRESIDENT AND TO A DEMOCRATIC AMERICA OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND PROTECTION OF EQUAL RIGHTS ! -
DAWN NARET’
*****************************
Al W. – No Aunt Dawn, that was the portion of her statement that was originally used, that got her in so much
trouble. Then they released the rest of the comment where she explained the personal revelations her actions caused
her and the fact she did help the white farmer save his farm. Even the old farmer’s wife has been interviewed and
said she absolutely saved their farm for them, and they remain friends to this day.
*************************
AUNT DAWN – NO UNCLE AL………THAT WAS THE AUTOMATIC REFLEX THAT HER BRAIN FUNCTIONS FLOW THROUGH…….BEFORE
THEY CONSIDER THE CONSEQUENSES OF THEIR RACE BASED PREJUDICE
******************************
Aunt Dawn – SHE HELPED ONLY ENOUGH TO COVER HER BUTT. IF IT HAD BEEN A BLACK FARMER…….SHE WOULD HAVE GONE THE
EXTRA MILE, THAT SHE ADMITTED WAS AVAILABLE TO THE WHITE FARMER, BUT SHE NEGLECTEDTO USE IT, OUT OF PREJUDICE. DONT
WHIT-WASH BLACK ERROR, OUT OF FEAROF BEING ACCUSED OF PREJUDICE. PREJUDICE IS A DIRTY ATTITUDE. AND IT IS EVEN
DIRTIER WHEN … See MoreDISCOVERED IN A BLACK FEMALE, WHO WAS OBVIOUSLY GIVEN EVERY AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY TO
GRADUATE COLLEGE AND RECIEVE ACCEPTANCE INTO AN ESTEEMED CAREER POSITION……..IT IS A SPIT IN THE FACE TO THE
TAXPAYING WHITE AMERICANS, WHO PROTECTED THE EQUAL RIGHTS, AND HELD NO PREJUDICE TO PUT HER THERE. I WONT WHITE-WASH
THEIR PROPAGANDA OR EXCUSES FOR BAD BEHAVIOR. – DAWN NARET’
*******************************
Aunt Dawn – READ THE WHOLE THING……THAT WAS THE PORTION THAT SHE ORIGINALLY” STATED”………. “so I didn’t give
him the full force of what I could do. I did enough.”………GUILTY ! AS CHARGED
********************************
Aunt Dawn – LMAO ! I JUST LEARNED THAT : )
*********************************
Jimmy M. – plus she worked for some nonprofit organization at the time, not the federal govt, so regardless of her
stance on race she didn’t have a govt job at the time so firing her over a recall of events 24 yrs ago while not in
the employ of the govt is not revelant to her current job with the govt.(ADDED BY DAWN NARET’ – Sherrod says in her
story that Chapter 12 bankruptcy had just been enacted; Chapter 12 was instituted for family farmers in 1986, while
Sherrod was appointed to head the USDA’s Rural Development office in Georgia just last July. Furthermore, the point
of Sherrod’s story is that race is not an issue. – END ADD-ON)
******************************
Aunt Dawn – dear uncle jimmy, : ) i actually see your point, and it is good……….but it is not complete. I
researched more on this and chose CBS NEWS version of what the lady said, in full. It was the same as the video. The
bottom line WAS THE PORTION THAT SHE ORIGINALLY” STATED”………. “so I didn’t give him the full force of what I
could do. I did … See Moreenough.”. How could she be in a position of making these decisions, if she was not
working for the government at the time ? Even if her position of authority was through a non-profit, contracted to
dispense the new Chapter 12 Grants, she was functioning in a trusted capacity as a paid representative of the the
gov. In this capacity, she was obligated to all the federal equal rights and non-prejudice decision making
principles as a full-time gov. employee. Now, comes the controversy, and it will probably have to be cont’d on next
comment. First, let me complete the flow of this info. There is no change as to her responsibility in respect to
whom she was employed by. It WAS THE GOV. THERE IS NO CHANGE IN COMPLAINTS OF “OUT OF CONTEXT”. In the lady’s own
words, she did not give him the full measure, based on prejudice. The lady erred. But more important, the lady did
NOT repent or apologize for the error. She never addressed her confession as an error in judgement. She never
changed or increased the grant approved to the farmer. She covered her butt. She is still trying to cover it, by
stating “taken out of context”. I see no change or repentance. I see a false excuse of dept. pressure and a false
attempt to make it appear unwarrented. But, had the Dept. been aware of this activity and This personal wavering on
equal rights, I am sure she never would have been offered a promotion to her recently lost position. The Fed Gov. is
now faced with weeding out these hidden attitudes and I am grateful. I have been a victim of their prejudices for
many years. hats off to the FED. but, here is the point you opened my eyes to. There is now a second controversy,
that enters. Was the exposing of this issue an unfair attempt, by the Tea-Party, to embarrass and win an argument,
with the NAACP, as a rebuttal to their accusations of prejudice in the Tea-Party ? It was honorable of the NAACP to
immed. accept proof of guilt, in their own house, They should have not backed out from that initial acceptance of
evidence. The facts remain, that had the Dept. been aware of the lady’s with holding of full measure, to the white
farmer, she would not have been promoted. The probability that she has been used, as a pawn, by the Tea-Party, is
sad but not embarrassing, because the truth is the truth. The lady did not address her confession, she attacked the
Dept. with an excuse of “out of context”, which was dishonest and she would certainly hinder current efforts to
weed-out and investigate hidden prejudicial dangers. Whether she was used as a pawn, now has no bearing. The facts
exist, according to the Dept.s agenda to locate and excise personnel whose decisions could be based on prejudice.
There was no apology for the confessed error, on a lie of “taken out of context”. This does not reflect a change in
racial attitudes and would be most wisely viewed as a dangerous employee to the honorable intentions of the Dept.
JULY 22,2010 UPDATE: NEWS TODAY THAT THE USDA HAS GIVEN AN APOPLGY TO MS. SHERROD: THIS IS A RE-PUBLISHING OF MY
COMMENT, ON THE TOPIC, AT FACEBOOK.COM/AUNT DAWN.
quote Al W. : “this presents us with a unique opportunity for honest and frank discussions about race, racism and
the blinding rush to be politically correct.”- END QUOTE………..I give no finaly for ms sherrod. I would rather
be CONSTITUTIONALY CORRECT.
The embarrassment of anyone being informed that this episode took place 24 years ago, should have faded …with a
logical path of investigation of all the facts. I did that.
I am disappointed that the white house could bend under the pressure of “24 years ago”.
The facts remain, in her own words, that she knowingly discriminated, did NOT change the REDUCED financial
assistance she gave the white farmer, but only gave enough to cover her butt and she never would have been deemed
qualified for promotion, to her current position, if these attitudes had been evidenced and exposed, instead of
hidden under a facade of unevidenced repentance.
I don’t agree with everything my President decides and will honor him in his decisions, but this one shows a failure
to stand up to the manipulations and false witnessings of the “corrupt government employee” bank, that I believed
was finally going to be mowed down and dismantled.
EQUAL RIGHTS for white laborers may take as long as it took to put the black welfare people, their children and
their grand-children through college.
I wrote an article “THE CURRENT AMERICAN CIVIL WAR”, that gave a documentorial narrative, over 4 decades, on how the
white American laborers were working for $1.10 an hour, paying full rent, paying full grocery prices, paying
babysitters, paid medical hospital coverage and paid cash for all our medical visits and treatments, no medicaid, no
stay-at-home-moms, no food stamps, no rent supplement payments.
And now for over twenty-thirty years, they have been welcomed into fine careers and we have been receiving
beligerant service, with prejudice, from many of the blacks, that white laborer taxpayers put through college and
they thank us with ill treatment and by becoming corrupt government employees. ms. sherrod gets no hooooorah from
me. see: “THE CURRENT AMERICAN CIVIL WAR” at: www.authordawnnaret.blogspot.com – Dawn Naret’
