NOVEMBER – 2009 – “D.N. POLITICS”, BY DAWN NARET’ AT: www.dnpolitics.wordpress.com

•September 11, 2009 • Leave a Comment

pa-lic1

IT’S OCTOBER ! I SENSE THE HOUNDS AND FEEL THE SWIRL OF BRILLIANT LIFE COLORS FLYING FREE ! I ALSO FEEL LIKE THE LADY, IN THE SHOWER, AT THE BATES MOTEL ! ! BOO ! !

fall

CLICK HERE AND THEN CLICK “SLIDE SHOW”
TO VIEW MY FALL FOLIAGE SLIDE SHOW -
http://picasaweb.google.com/authordawnnaret/AUTUMINWESTERNPABYDAWNNARET?feat=directlink

REPUBLISHING OF “BAN ALL BANS”, BY DAWN NARET’

•May 18, 2009 • Leave a Comment

pa-lic1

AUTHOR: DAWN NARET’

HOLDS FULL AND LEGAL COPYRIGHTS ON ALL COMMENTS AND COMMENTARY POSTED,

 

“COPY” AND PASTE URL OF THIS BLOG SITE, TO PULL UP AND VIEW ANYTIME:

 

http://dawnnaret.wordpress.com/

 

******************************************************

 

                                              DISCLAIMER:

ALL ARTICLES, ON THIS SITE ARE THE ORIGINAL WORK OF SOLE AUTHOR: DAWN NARET’

ANY (HTML) ADDED, THAT EXCEEDS THE USUAL PROGRAMMING OF “WORDPRESS TEMPLATES” IS REJECTED, BY THE AUTHOR, INCLUDING CRIMINAL TRESPASS THAT ADDED (HTML) CO-AUTHOR OR EDITING CREDIT TO AN UNKNOWN HACKER VIA INITIALS OR NUMBER I.D.

*****************************************************

NOTICE:

ALL DAWN NARET BLOG SITES CONTAIN ORIGINAL COMMENTS AND COMMENTARY, WRITTEN BY THE OWNER, DAWN NARET’, AND ARE COPYRIGHTED WITH ALL LEGAL OWNERSHIP ENTITLED TO AN ORIGINAL AUTHOR, FROM THE FIRST DAY OF PUBLISHING.

YOU ARE WELCOME TO “COPY” (DO NOT CUT).

COPYING IS PERMITTED ONLY IF FULL CREDIT IS GIVEN, IN THE LEGAL AUTHOR’S NAME, WHEN QUOTING OR PRINTING.VARIATIONS WILL NOT BE FREE OF COURT CHARGES OF PLAGIARISM, FOR THEFT OF INTELIGENT PROPERTY, IF THE VARIATION CONTAINS MORE THAN 1% OF QUOTABLE WRITTEN WORK OR 1% OF THE CONCEPT PROCESS IS PARALLELED TO ORIGINAL WORK DONE BY DAWN NARET’.

*****************************************************

LET THESE BE THE WORDS AND THE TRUTH OF MY PHILOSOPHY FOREVER !

“THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE WAS THE PROMISE;THE CONSTITUTION WAS THE FULFILLMENT.”

…………The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for, among old parchments, or musty records.

They are written, as with a sun beam in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can NEVER be erased OR obscured by mortal power.”

Alexander Hamilton.

*********************************************************

“QUOTE THE DAWN…..EVERMORE……THESE ARE MY WORDS AND THE TRUTH OF MY PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY FOREVER ! !

“TO HEAR OR READ SOMEONE ELSES OPINION, IS PROOF OF ALIVENESS ONLY…..

TO MEMORIZE IT AND TELL OTHERS, IS A SIGN OF APEING ABILITY…..

TO EVALUATE IT AND SLICE OUT THE INACCURACIES OF IT, IS A SIGN OF INTELLIGENCE…..

TO PONDER, RESEARCH, ORGANIZE AND PROVE LOGIC AND THEN CREATE A MORE PERFECT COMPREHENSION, IS GENIUS”….

AN ORIGINAL THOUGHT BY DAWN NARET’ MARCH 2008

**************************************************

banhorse

BAN ALL BANS !! OR THE COMMUNISTS, WHO VOTE FOR THEM, WILL ERASE OUR “CONSTITUTION”

This is an editorial by Dawn Naret’

July 16, 2007

In My Opinion, This is the sad truth of where our Government representatives are standing right now. They have actually allowed an issue, that is not even a legislative,  debatable, issue, to stand as one of the main deciding factors of the completion date of the Pennsylvania Budget Agreement.

Where is the basic knowledge, all of these people learned in elementary school? Did they not study the “Constitution Of The United States”? Did most of them not even study those guaranteed “Equal Rights” demands when they proceeded through law school?

Were they off on “vacation” every time there was a dispute, in some reputable neighborhood, where a porno shop or unsavory XXX theater was intending to open a business, and they were attempting to block it?

What was the result, in EVERY one of these litigation disputes? The unsavory SHOP OWNER WON !! Why? Because, to block him, or obstruct his choice of type or function of business was declared, verified and extremely relevantly A CLEAR VIOLATION OF HIS “CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!

If you do not want to buy or view unsavory offerings….then don’t go there, don’t view their films or don’t purchase their products. But, the shop keeper WILL STAY, and you cannot ban him, obstruct him, move him out, or even dictate what items he may choose to sell or how to sell them or if he wants to permit smoking in his shop.

This is a prime example, that ALL of our politicians and legislators MUST pay attention to. We have, in this country a very serious WAR going on, ACTIVELY at this very minute, and none of them seem to be on the side of the American Citizen.

It is a WAR over cancelling the American Constitution and FORCING the American citizens to accept that this country is no longer a democracy and that they no longer have any rights! It is HERE NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!

The current steam rolling of creating bans against smoking and adjacent criminal prosecution , harassment, discrimination in housing and employment as well as, the worst “Communist/Gestapo” type tactic that has reared itself up, as an actual court decision..is the seizing of children  from the home of smoking parents, in Ohio !!!!!!!!!!

Verification  of extremely wide, organized efforts, to create a public “brainwashing” and a political “brain-deadening” to gain support for all things “UNCONSTITUTIONAL” and “NOT PROTECTIVE OR IN THE BEST INTEREST OF ALL CITIZENS”,  can be seen all over the internet.

Below is evidence one of the organized movements, led by an “alleged” Boston doctor. This steam roller lobbying is occurring in every state, the same as every other issue that the Anti-American “Communists/Gestapo, destroyers of our country’s ECONOMY and CONSTITUTION” has been swelling and spreading and disguising itself as  “concerned citizens for a better America” or “protectors of everyone’s health”.

“Major Anti-Smoking Group Wants Parents Who Smoke Around their Children Referred to Authorities for Child Abuse.

A major national anti-smoking group is publicly calling for parents who smoke in the presence of their children to be treated as child abusers. The group – Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) – is calling smoking in the presence of children the most prevalent form of child abuse and wants parents who smoke around children to be investigated as child abusers.”- (End of internet sample)

This, perhaps unfairly, singled-out campaign, is authored by Dr. Michael Siegel.

His group is listed in the quoted portion of the article and in another article by 20/20 TV investigation into the relevancy and accuracy of second-hand smoking dangers, I again found Dr. Siegel mentioned with a much appreciated,  honest opinion that nullifies the complaints of smoke dangers in resturants, bars and public buildings:

“Dr. Michael Siegel, a leading advocate of bans on smoking in the workplace because of the harm from daily exposure to secondhand smoke, says the 20 or 30 minute claims are ridiculous.

“If someone is just exposed for 30 minutes, it’s completely reversible, and it’s not gonna cause hardening of the arteries,” Siegel said.” – END QUOTE

What these people do not seem to get, is that smoking is a personal choice. And perhaps, they don’t want anyone except THEMSELVES “Protecting Their Health” as a GUISE to cover reducing their freedom to choose and receive protection, by legitimate legislation, already written in the “CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES”, against job discrimination, housing discrimination OR HAVING THEIR CHILDREN SEIZED !!!!!!

Now, why, with respect and credit given to Dr. Siegel, at least, have I insulted EVERY campaigner for smoking bans????

Because, if the owner of a porn shop can exist, indoors, in whatever capacity or activity he chooses, in any building or neighborhood he chooses, WHY AM I NOT GETTING THE SAME BENEFIT OF MY “ EQUAL” Constitutional Rights to his??

Is it because there is now a majority count of non-smokers verses smokers? WHO CARES !!!!!!!!!

Congress and the Senators may be able to enact new legislation with a 2/3 (two-thirds) majority… But the Constitution demands “EQUAL RIGHTS” not “majority rules”.

Just because you do not like something, does not mean that then no one should be allowed to do it, even if you vote on it as a majority! You CANNOT ignore, erase or alter the EQUAL RIGHTS demand of the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

When you force smokers So why would I insult these people who support smoking bans? Because, IN MY OPINION they are:

Trying to erode away at the very core of Democracy.

They are trying to weaken and phase out the Constitution of the United States.

They are dividing the national citizenry, into angry,  “unequal”, prejudiced against, militants  and revolutionaries that prefer to be simple God-fearing American citizens living in the land of FREEDOM.

They are promoting Socialism,  communism, dictatorships, elitism and nazi prejudice.

This is what I see and feel when I hear of new avenues of discrimination creating more erosion of Equal Rights in this country. Is that what they mean for me to feel ??

I feel it and against every campaigner who is trying to enslave me in a non-Democracy system and I feel it against EVERY POLITICIAN who supports them and allows themselves to be manipulated by them and who votes for bans that help them eliminate our Civil Rights, our Constitutional Rights and our HUMAN RIGHTS.

This issue is only ONE avenue of their attacking the American Democracy. It already has caused smokers to loose jobs, be rejected for housing and be banished from social gatherings. How could ANY American POLITICIAN condone or support such abuses.

These bans set up a process of “CRIMINALIZATION” that they plan to implement as further abuse,  reputation destruction and total life destruction of honest, loyal, law abiding citizens. They have been slandering and attacking us, at places of employment, until we loose our jobs.

They have been slandering, infiltrating our businesses and frightening our customers away, until we loose our businesses, they have stalked us with terrorism trying to create mental instabilities of paranoia, until we are institutionalized as incompetent, and they have impersonated and disgraced many citizens until they have lost their job, their business and their home.

I have been a victim of several of these offences myself. Most recently, I was on a public Pittsburgh city bus and I was dozed off. The bus driver called the Bus Co. security guards to wake me, and the guard woke me up by hitting me more than 10 times. At least 6 times after I was awake a hollering for him to stop hitting me.

When I demanded his company I.D. and declared that I am filing an official complaint of abuse and assault, he issued me a citation for “disorderly conduct” ! I was being physically assaulted and he issues ME a citation to intimidate and cover-up what he had done. Then, he told someone,that he had called, to PUT ME ON THE LIST. I asked what list, and he told me it was none of my business.

Then, I appealed the citation and had a hearing with the magistrate. The magistrate violated my right to “DUE PROCESS” by not letting me testify that I was instigated to an angry verbal discourse, because I had been physically assaulted by this man. He cut off my speaking and said “that is irrelevant”. I was found guilty and definitely appealed that decision.

I am fighting an attempt to “CRIMINALIZE” my reputation as an honest, honorable, law-abiding, loyal American. If you haven’t DONE anything for them to criminalize you with, they will FABRICATE it or FRAME YOU !!

This is the WAR that we are fighting RIGHT NOW against all of these ANTI-AMERICANS that are persecuting us if we do not join their party or cooperate with their group, which slanders and provides false witnessing against American Citizens, in order to steal their identity, their job, their business or their children !!!

I am of the opinion that any POLITICIAN who votes for these bans does indeed commit an “ANTI-AMERICAN” act. I will not even be satisfied if they vote for EQUAL RIGHTS and cancel the state Ban Idea.

I want our Rights protected with a national, across the board, abolishment of any existing or proposed ban, of this nature that so violates the Constitution and promotes HOMELESSNESS, UNEMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION, PREJUDICE and DEATH of American citizens.

A NEW SITE AND A NEW GRIPE TO MAKE YOU AWARE OF ! !

•May 13, 2009 • Leave a Comment

PLEASE VISIT MY NEW SITE:

“AMISH DAWN’S SURVIVAL TRAINING AND JELLIES ! !”
http://www.amishdawn.blogspot.com

 

THIS NEW SITE IS A TRIBUTE TO THE LANCASTER AMISH PEOPLE AND A TRULY INFORMATIVE SITE, IN CHAOTIC TIMES, FOR THE “TENDER-FOOTED” PAMPERED ONES, TO LEARN SOME SELF-SUFFICIENCY SKILLS OF PROVIDING YOUR OWN FOOD AND PREPARING IT, CANNING AND PRESERVING IT AND RECIPIES FOR COOKING THE WILD GAME AND FISH CAUGHT BY YOURSELF, AS MONEY SAVING, FAMILY FOOD PROVISION SKILLS.

I HAVE HUNDREDS OF BUDGET CUTTING SUGGESTIONS, TO ADD AS TIME PERMITS, BUT THE BEGINNING, IS ALREADY A WEALTH OF TRAINING FOR SOME VERY NECESSARY SKILLS, IN AN UNSTEADY ECONOMY AND AS OUR U.S. FARMERS ARE DWINDING AND PRODUCING LESS FOOD AND TOBACCO.

NOW FOR THE GRIPE !!

WE WERE BETTER OFF IN THE 50′S, WHEN WE WERE TOTALLY SELF-SUFFICIENT AND PRODUCED ALL THAT WE NEEDED…RIGHT HERE, AND KEPT ALL THE MONEY FROM SALES OF IT…RIGHT HERE IN OUR HEALTHY CASH FLOW OF U.S. GNP CAPITALISTIC SYSTEM.

OUR EXPANDING ERROR, OF ENTERING GLOBAL CIRCLES HAS, IN MY OPINION, ONLY SPREAD OUR TAX-PAYERS HARD-EARNED CASH AROUND TO FAR TOO MANY COUNTRIES AND INTO FAR TOO MANY NON-CITIZEN HANDS THAT HAVE BEEN REDUCING EVERY OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO HAVE A HEALTHY CASH FLOW, BECAUSE WE ARE GIVING MORE THAN WE NEED OURSELVES, OUT TO OTHERS WHO DID NOT SWEAT OR SACRIFICE FOR IT AND WILL NOT BE SPENDING IT HERE TO RE-ENTER OUR CASH FLOW.

HOW DUMB CAN YOU BE…TO TAKE FROM THE LABORERS AND GIVE TO THE RICH ? ?

THIS A.I.G. MESS HAD US GIVING BAIL-OUT MONEY TO EUROPEAN BANKS AS WELL AS TO U.S. BANKS ! !

HOW MUCH SWEAT WILL YOU DEMAND FROM THE U.S. LABORERS, WHO ARE TOLD

THERE IS NOT ENOUGH FOR YOU, SORRY………..

NO SOCIAL SECURITY COST OF LIVING INCREASES FOR 2 YEARS………….

NO INCREASE IN MINIMUM WAGE…………

WHO THE HAY… SWEAT FOR THOSE BILLIONS THAT EVERYONE ELSE IS BEING HANDED TO GET THEM THROUGH HARD TIMES?

AMERICAN HOMES ARE BEING FORCLOSED ON, AS THE MONEY EARNED, FROM THE DELINQUENT HOME-OWNERS DURING BETTER, EMPLOYED TIMES, IS HANDED OVER TO THE BANKS, BUT NOT TO COVER THEIR MORTGAGE PAYMENTS.

U.S. SOCIAL SECURITY RECIPIENTS ARE BEING ROBBED OF 1/2 TO 1/3 OF THEIR DUE CASH, BY EMBEZZELMENT, AND THEY ARE THE ONES THAT CONTRIBUTED THE CASH, IN THE S.S. TREASURY THAT TELLS THEM, NO INCREASES POSSIBLE.

I READ TODAY THAT THE FUND IS NOW EXPECTED TO RUN OUT OF MONEY SOONER THAN EXPECTED.

WELL LET ME GIVE YOU ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF WHY…….!

ALL MY WORKING LIFE OF 45 YEARS, I PAID 11% OF MY GROSS PAY INTO SOC. SEC. MY EMPLOYER MATCHED IT AND WE HAD NO FUND PROBLEMS.

NOW, WE HAVE CORRUPTION OCCURRING, IN THE FUND, THAT HAS APPARENTLY BEEN DEFRAUDING THE TAX PAYERS AND THE U.S. EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS.

THE NEWSPAPER, (pittsburgh tribune review – 5/13/09) EXPLAINED THAT THE FUND IS RUNNING OUT, BECAUSE PAYMENTS ARE LARGER THAN CONTRIBUTIONS OF 6.2%, WHICH THE EMPLOYER MATCHES……….

WE PAY 11% WHICH THE EMPLOYER MATCHES!!

THAT MEANS THAT “POSSIBLY” THE PORTION OF 11%, PAID BY THE EMPLOYER, IS BEING EMBEZZELED AND THE 11% PORTION DEDUCTED FROM THE EMPLOYEE IS BEING SPLIT TO COVER THE LOSS OF THE EMPLOYER’S PORTION……….

OR, THAT THE EMPLOYERS ARE BEING GIVEN AN UNFAIR WAIVER FROM PAYMENTS AND THE PLANNED AMOUNTS, TO COME INTO THE FUND HAVE BEEN CUT IN HALF, FOR AS MANY YEARS AS THE FCORRUPT EMPLOYEES HAVE BEEN SAYING THAT THE TAX PAYERS ONLY PAY 6.2%.

EITHER THE EMPLOYERS HAVE BEEN DUCKING OUT ON THEIR OBLIGATION OR THE TAX PAYERS MONEY IS BEING SPLIT TO COVER EITHER THE DUCKING OUT OF EMPLOYER PAYMENTS OR THE EMBEZZLEMENT OF THE EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES PAYMENTS.

LETS LOOK AT THE NUMBERS:

11% TRULY PAID LESS 6.2% DECLARED AS PAID= 4.8% 

UNDECLARED AS RECIEVED,

TAKE THAT TIMES 2, (4.8% FROM TAX PAYER AND MATCHED 4.8 FROM EMPLOYER) = 9.6% MISSING ! !

THE FUND IS BASED ON AN ESTIMATED INCOME OF THE 11% PLUS 11% = 22% OF NATIONAL GROSS PAYROLL INCOME.

BUT, ONLY 6.2% PLUS 6.2% = 12.4% ARE BEING TURNED IN, TO THE FUND, FOR INVESTMENTS AND PAYMENTS TO SOC. SEC RECIPIENTS !

22% OF NATIONAL GROSS PAYROLL (NGP), ACTUALLY PAID IN, LESS 12.4% DECLARED AS COLLECTED = 9.6% OF GROSS NATIONAL PAYROLL (NGP) IS NOT BEING  DECLARED AS RECIEVED ! !

*** 12.4% NGP DECLARED IS ONLY 53% OF ACTUAL 22% NGP BEING COLLECTED (11 WOULD BE 50%)

*** 9.6% MISSING IS 47% MISSING OF WHAT HAS BEEN COLLECTED ! !

*** 47% OF SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRIBUTIONS MISSING ! !

NOT JUST 6.2% OR 4.8% – THOSE FIGURES REPRESENT THE % OF NATIONAL GROSS PAYROLL FOR DETERMINING DEDUCTION AMOUNT FROM THE EMPLOYEE AND MATCHING AMOUNT FOR THE EMPLOYER.

THIS IS 47% OF THE COMBINED MONEY COLLECTED FROM EMPLOYEES AND MATCHED BY EMPLOYERS THAT IS MISSING AND NOT BEING DECLARED WHEN THEY CLAIM THAT 6.2 IS PAID WHEN IT WAS REALLY 11% AND 22% TOTAL MATCHED.

(I HAD A KIND MAN WITH A CALCULATOR DO THIS 47% CALCULATION WHILE I TYPED…IF IT’S OFF, I APOLOGIZE, BUT I KNOW IT’S NOT OFF BY MUCH BECAUSE 11 IS 50% OF 22 AND 12.4 IS NOT MUCH MORE THAN 11, SO 53% TURNED IN SOUNDS RIGHT)

SOMEONE NEEDS TO INVESTIGATE THIS. I PAID 11% ALL MY LIFE.

ARE THERE CORRUPT EMPLOYEES, TRYING TO SPLIT THE FUNDS BETWEEN THE AUTHENTIC “REAL” GOVERNMENT AND THEIR PHONEY “DUPLICATE” GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS AND EMPLOYEES?

THIS IS WHY THE FUND HAS NOT BEEN STABLE.-
AND THIS IS WHY I FELT THAT I NEED TO GET THE U.S. PEOPLE PREPARED FOR PREVENTING STARVATION!

DAWN NARET’ – AN IRATE AMERICAN TAX-PAYER/RETIRED/DISABLED/HOMELESS/AND IRATE

PRESIDENT OBAMA ABOUT TO END “SECOND-HAND-SMOKE” DANGERS AND “SMOKING BANS”

•April 29, 2009 • Leave a Comment

APRIL 29, 2009
BY DAWN NARET’, PITTSBURGH, PA

HATS OFF TO PRESIDENT OBAMA ! !
IN APRIL, 2009, THE PRESIDENT TOOK THE FIRST STEPS NECESSARY TO END THE GLOBAL FARCE AND DISCRIMINATION BEING ENACTED, UNDER THE GUISE AND EXCUSE OF….”SECOND-HAND-SMOKE” DANGERS.

THIS “THEORY” HAS BEEN THE LEVERAGE USED FOR THE ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, DISCRIMINATING, OFFENDING, BANISHING AND ERASURE OF NORMAL LIFESTYLE OF MILLIONS OF NORMAL, HONORABLE, INTELLECTUAL HUMANS, WHO MERELY HAVE CHOSEN TO SMOKE A LEGAL CIGARETTE, AFTER MEALS OR IN PUBLIC OR EVEN IN THEIR OWN HOME.

I WAS IN A BOOKSTORE RECENTLY, AND GAZED AT SEVERAL LIFESIZE MURALS OF ALL THE FAMOUS CLASSICAL AUTHORS AND NOTICED THAT EVERY ONE OF THEM WAS SMOKING, IN THE PORTRAITS. SMOKING HAS ALWAYS BEEN A LIFESTYLE OF THE “STYLISH”. IT WILL ALWAYS BE THAT AND NOT SOME DIRTY LITTLE SECRET THAT THOSE WITH LESS STYLE OR THE ABILITY TO GIVE EQUAL RIGHTS AND CHOICE TO MIGHT TRY TO REIMAGE IT.

THE UGLY, SELFISH DEMANDS BY OTHERS, WHO HAVE ATTEMPTED TO FORCE THEIR OWN PHILOSOPHIES ON EVERYONE IN THE WORLD, HAVE BEEN CREATING GREAT INCONVENIENCES, LAWSUITS AND EVEN HEATH DETRIMENTS TO SMOKERS.

SECOND-HAND-SMOKE IS A STILL A THEORETIC POSSIBILITY, IF CONSTANT, CUMULATIVE EXPOSURE IS EXPERIENCED BY A NON-SMOKER. BUT, INSTANT HEALTH DANGERS EXIST, WHEN A SMOKER IS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST, KICKED OUTSIDE AND FORCED TO HAVE A CIGARETTE IN A USUALLY NON-HYGIENIC ENVIRONMENT, NEXT TO TRASH AREAS, AND GIVEN NO SEATING OR SHELTER FROM INCLIMATE ELEMENTS.

IMMEDIATE ILLNESS COULD RESULT FROM EXPOSURE FROM THE REALITY OF BACTERIA, PNEUMONIA, OR STRESS RELATED FACTIONS OF EMOTIONAL RESPONSE TO BEING SO INSULTED AND HAVING THEIR RIGHTS SO VIOLATED.

THE NON-SMOKERS HAVE BEEN ATTACKING THE SMOKERS, ON AN ISSUE THAT THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN GUILTY OF………POSSIBLE CARCINOGENS IN THE EXHALANTS OF SMOKERS CIGARETTES. SMOKERS HAVE NEVER AGREED TO INHALE THESE CARCINOGENS AND ARE JUST AS ENRAGED AT THEIR ADDITION TO HEALTHY TOBACCO, AS THE NON-SMOKERS!

THIS DEBATE, NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN DIRECTED AT THE SMOKERS, WITH SECOND-HAND-SMOKE RESEARCH AND NON-PROVEN THEORIES, OR WITH SMOKING BANS AND INCREASING ATTEMPTS TO CRIMINALIZE ANYONE CHOOSING TO CONSUME A LEGAL PRODUCT.

THE DEBATE, CORRECTIONAL MEASURES AND DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DIRECTED AT THE TOBACCO COMPANIES, WHO DECIDED TO ADD THESE POISONS TO AN OTHERWISE, HEALTHY GREEN PLANT CREATED BY GOD, NON-POISONOUS, NON-HEALTH ENDANGERING, FULLY DEVELOPED, READY TO SIMPLY SHRED AND PACKAGE, TOTALLY ORGANIC PRODUCT THAT NEEDS NO ADDITIVES.

WHY HAVE THEY BEEN ADDING THESE CHEMICALS AND CARCINOGENS?
I SUSPECT THAT IT WAS TO INCREASE ADDICTION AND ALSO MAKE THE CIGARETTES BURN FASTER, IN ORDER TO FORCE CONSUMERS TO BUY MORE FREQUENTLY. OF COURSE, THIS IS ONLY MY OPINION……..BUT, WHY ELSE WOULD ANYONE POSSIBLY CHOOSE TO PUT POISON INTO A HEALTHY GREEN PLANT PRODUCT ?

TOBACCO IS THE SAME AS BASIL OR OREGANO. GRASSHOPPERS EAT THE LEAVES AS THEIR MAIN DAILY FOOD SOURCE, AND SPIT THE RESIDUAL “TOBACCO JUICE” OUT. IN HUMANS, THIS TRACE OF TAR AND NICOTINE STIMULATE THE BODY’S NATURAL CLEANSING SYSTEM, TO RID ITSELF OF TOXINS, THE SAME AS CITRIC ACID IN JUICE OR TANIC ACID IN TEA AND THEREFORE, SERVES AS A HEALTH ASSISTANT TO SMOKERS.

BUT ASIDE FROM THE HARM ITS “ABSENCE” IS INDUCING ON SMOKERS, WE HAVE TO WONDER “WHY” THE TOBACCO COMPANIES HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH RUINING A CONSUMABLE PRODUCT, FOR ALL THESE YEARS.

THE PROBLEM HAS BEEN WITH THE AUTHORITY HELD, BY THE F.D.A., FEDERAL FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION.

THE FDA ALWAYS HAD THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE INGREDIENTS AND PROTECT CONSUMERS FROM DANGEROUS ADDITIVES, BECAUSE TOBACCO IS “CONSUMED” INTO THE BODY, THROUGH INHALING INTO THE LUNGS. THE BLOOD COMES TO THE LUNGS TO BE OXYGENATED AND FLOWS DIRECTLY TO THE BRAIN AND EVERY CELL OF OUR BODY.

THAT IS MORE “CONSUMED” THAN ANY FOOD OR DRUG. THAT IS DEFINITELY UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE FDA TO PROTECT THE CONSUMERS FROM HEALTH DANGERS. BUT, THE PROBLEM, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, HAS BEEN THE TITLE OF THE DEPARTMENT, “FOOD AND DRUG” ADMINISTRATION, DID NOT SPECIFICALLY INCLUDE PRODUCTS OF TOBACCO.

IS TOBACCO INHALED?
IS IT THEN THE SAME AS ANY MEDICINAL INHALANT, PRODUCED AND MARKETED BY DRUG COMPANIES FOR ASTHMA?
IS IT NOT THEN LEGALLY AN INHALLANT?
DOES IT NOT THEN FALL UNDER THE LEGAL AUTHORITY OF AT LEAST “DRUG” AREA OF FDA RESPONSIBILITY, EVEN THOUGH IT IS NOT PRODUCED BY THEM, BUT IS FULLY PRODUCED TO COMPLETION BY GOD?
YES…YES…YES…AND YES ! ! !

THE FDA SHOULD HAVE BEEN POLICING THESE INGREDIENTS ALL ALONG AND FORCING THEIR REMOVAL, INSTEAD OF ALLOWING A WARNING NOTE TO BE POSTED ON THE PACKAGE !

“IF IT IS HARMFUL TO THE CONSUMER HEALTH…THEN GET IT OUT OF THERE ! !” – QUOTE – DAWN NARET’

NOW, FOR THE GOOD NEWS ! !

PRESIDENT OBAMA, IN HIS CONCERN FOR THE WELL-BEING OF EQUALITY AND GOOD HEALTH, TO “ALL” THE CITIZENS , HAS ALREADY SIGNED A NEW BILL DECLARING THE FDA TO HAVE FULL AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR REGULATING TOBACCO COMPANIES ! !

SMOKERS AND NON-SMOKERS ARE REJOICING AND LOOKING FORWARD TO THE BANISHMENT OF ALL SMOKING BANS AND DISCRIMINATION ASSOCIATED WITH THEM.
BY DAWN NARET’
http://www.sokissmybutt.blogspot.com
dawnnaret@gmail.com

HOORAH ! ! OBAMA REJECTS NATIONALIZATION OF U.S. BANKS ! !

•February 25, 2009 • Leave a Comment

FEBRUARY 25, 2009
BY DAWN NARET’, PITTSBURGH, PA, USA

GOOD GOD ALMIGHTY ! ! THE BOY’S STALLING THE STALLERS ! ! CONGRATULATIONS BAMY ! ! MY BOY, MY PRIDE ! ! MY HOPE ! !

GREAT NEWS IN THE MORNING PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE, “MARKET DIVES, AS REGULATORS CUSHION BANKS” TUES. FEB. 24, 2009.

PARTIAL QUOTE:

“AMID GROWING CONCERNS THAT THE GOVERNMENT MAY BE FORCED TO TAKE OVER LARGE PARTS OF THE BANKING SYSTEM, FIVE FEDERAL REGULATORS ISSUED A JOINT STATEMENT MONDAY ANNOUNCING THE CREATION OF A SPECIAL LIFELINE TO KEEP TROUBLED BANKS AFLOAT, BUT THEY REJECTED OUTRIGHT NATIONALIZATION.” – END QUOTE

THE REST IS AN UP AND DOWN TRAIL OF POSSIBLE ALTERNATE SOLUTIONS. BUT THE MEAT IS IN THE REJECTION OF “NATIONALIZING” THE AMERICAN CAPITAL, FREE-ENTERPRISE, DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT KNOWING WHEN “ENOUGH IS ENOUGH” ! !

THIS SWAYING, ZIZ-ZAGGING OCCULT ATTEMPT TO DESTABLIZE THE U.S. DOLLAR, DEMORALIZE THE US CITIZENS AND TO DESTROY THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AND ALL THE FREE-ENTERPRISE BUSINESS AND INDIVIDUAL INCOME OPPORTUNITIES, THAT IT PROTECTS.

THE PHOTO, OF PRESIDENT OBAMA SHOWS A PAINED EXPRESSION, AS HE ” ADDRESSES THE FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY SUMMIT ON MONDAY AT THE WHITE HOUSE”. BUT, WHAT I PERSONALLY SEE, IS THE DISCOVERY OF BETRAYAL, THAT HAS OBVIOUSLY OCCURRED, SINCE THE INITIATION OF HIS “LET’S FIX IT ! ” START-UP.

IT IS NO SECRET, THAT HE COULD NOT EXPECT 100% BACKING OR CO-OPERATION, BUT HE ANTICIPATED THIS TO BE AN ATTEMPT TO BLOCK FROM HIS OPPOSITION, NOT FROM HIS OWN PARTY. NEVER THE LESS…. “THERE ARE SNAKES AMONG US”, THAT HAVE BEEN INFILTRATING, OBSTRUCTING, MISINFORMING AND DOWNRIGHT EXTORTING TO ACHIEVE A “SLOW-DOWN OF IMMEDIATE FIX EFFORTS” AND A GRADUAL MANIPULATION TO A REVERSAL OF DEMOCRATIC SOLUTION FORMULAS AND A RETURN TOWARD MORE THAN COMMUNISTIC AND AT LEAST SOCIALISTIC LOBBYINGS AND ALTIMATUMS.

THESE SNAKES HAVE BEEN ASSISTING, IN THE GLOBAL EFFORTS TO BREAK-DOWN GOVERNMENTS, AND SIEZE CONTROL, BY DISSOLVING NATIONAL AND INDIVIDUAL FINANCIAL SOLVENCY AND SECURE CONTINUITY OF PERSONAL AND BUSINESS INCOME AND CASH FLOW, THROUGH THE CORPORATE AND INDIVIDUAL CAPITALISTIC, CONSUMERIZED CASH-FLOWING PATHS. TO STATE IT, IN A MORE VISIBLE “CYCLICAL” CONTEXT, THE “FED”, IS DIFFERENT FROM THE “U.S. TREASURY”.

THE “FED” (FEDERAL RESERVE) IS THE “PRINTER” OF U.S. CURRENCY AND “THE HOLDER” , IN FORT KNOX, OF THE GOLD AND SILVER, THAT BACKS THAT CURRENCY, AND GUARENTEES THAT IT IS WORTH MORE THAN THE PAPER IT IS PRINTED ON. SORTA LIKE A VENDER/SELLER OF CURRENCY, GOLD AND CHEAP ALLOYS COINS.

OUR WHOLE CAPITALISTIC SYSTEM BEGINS WITH THE FED. T

HE FED PRINTS THE MONEY AND “SELLS” IT TO THE BANKS. THE BANKS PAY THE FACE VALUE OF THE CURRENCY, AT A “FED RATE”, WHICH FLUCTUATES, TO INSPIRE THE BANKS TO BUY AND OPEN UP THE BUSINESSES AND NATIONAL “CASH FLOW”, DOWN TO INDIVIDUAL “CONSUMER SPENDING” ACTIVITY. NOW, IT MUST “ALL” FLOW FREELY, ALL THE WAY TO THE BOTTOM, TO THE “INDIVIDUAL CONSUMERS”, PROVIDING AVAILABLE CASH ALL ALONG THE WAY, WITH NO “COGS IN THE WHEEL”. BUT…….HERE’S THE CLINCHER, WHEN IT HAS BEEN DISPERSED, “ALL THE WAY TO THE BOTTOM”, AS “DISTRIBUTED ECONOMY”, IT MAKES A “U-TURN” AND BEGINS THE UPWARD “PROFIT COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION” WHICH IS THE NATURAL RESULT OF “CONSUMER SPENDING”, WHICH IS THE “GRAND SUCCESS AND VITAL NEED”, FOR THE CYCLE TO CONTINUE AND TO FLOW. IF THERE OCCURS A “COG IN THE WHEEL”, AND “DISTRIBUTED ECONOMY” DOES NOT REACH “ALL” THE INDIVIDUALS, THE BOTTOM STOPS SPENDING AND IT ALL FALLS, BLOATED AT THE TOP, WITH “UNSOLD GOODS” AND NO CORPORATE PROFITS AND NO CORPORATE TRIPS TO THE BANKS, REQUESTING ADDITIONAL CASH LOANS, WHICH GIVE INCOME TO THE BANKS! THEREFORE, IT IS NOT THE CORPORATIONS, THAT ARE THE “VITAL HEART OF OUR ECONOMY”, IT IS THE INDIVIDUAL “CONSUMER SPENDERS” ! ! HEY ALRIGHTY NOW ! ! NO MORE BELLY-ACHING OVER THE LADIES SHOPPING SPREES…..WE’RE BOOSTING THE GNP ! ! THAT IS JUST THE ROUTE OF IT. HERE ARE THE SPECIFICS: THE BANKS LOAN OUT MONEY, FOR PROFIT, TO BUSINESSES FOR; BUILDING (IE: BUSINESS STARTS, EXPANSIONS, RESEARCH) AND FOR PURCHASING OF RAW SUPPLIES FOR INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION EXPENSES. THE BANKS ALSO LOAN OUT MONEY TO INDIVIDUALS, FOR BUILDING, (IE: HOUSES, SOLE PROPRIATORSHIP BUSINESS STARTS AND EDUCATION) AND FOR “CONSUMERISM”/PERSONAL SPENDING, ON ALL LIFE NEEDS, CONVENIENCES, COMFORTS AND PERSONAL INCOME OPPORTUNITIES. I WOULD LIKE TO CLARIFY HERE, THAT “EDUCATION” IS A PURCHASED COMMODY, FROM A CORPORATE-LIKE “SERVICE PROVIDER” OF “SOLD” EDUCATIONAL COURSES AND DEGREES, FOR PROFIT. UNIVERSITIES DO NOT QUALIFY AS “NON-PROFIT, NON-TAX-PAYING, “FREE” SOCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS OR “FREE” ATTENDANCE CHURCHES. (WE HAVE THE “U.P.M.C.” GROUP, WHICH IS THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, PA MEDICAL MONOPOLY IN PITTSBURGH, WHICH HAS PURCHASED NEARLY ALL OF THE EXISTING HOSPITALS AND MEDICAL, PSYCHIATRIC, REHAB AND TRAINING FACILITIES, CHARGES FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT AT A NON-DISCOUNTED RATE, CHARGES RENT ON OFFICE BUILDING COMMERCIAL SPACE AND CHARGES FULL RATES ON ALL MEDICAL TREATMENTS AND SERVICES PROVIDED WITHIN IT’S “HUGE” SPRAWL OF AQUISITIONS. IT HAS EVEN ADMITTED TO, A RECENT 8 BILLION DOLLAR PROFIT YEAR, I BELIEVE WAS THE FIGURE IN THE NEWS, NOT MANY YEARS AGO ! ! THEY CAN ACHIEVE THIS KIND OF PROFIT, EVEN WITH MEDICARE AND MEDICAID PATIENTS (WHO’S CARE IS MORE THAN FAIRLY PAID FOR AND STILL EXORBINANT IN IT’S COST) BECAUSE THEY DO NOT PAY THERE “FAIR SHARE” OF TAXES. INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS AND SMALLER BUSINESSES HAVE HAD TO PAY EXTRA FOR FISCAL BUDGETS TO BE MET……TRASH THE TAX EVADERS CLYDE! ! BUT IT IS NOT THEIR FAULT…..IT IS THE FAULT OF INEFFICIENT CIVIL, STATE AND FEDERAL POLITICIANS, THAT ARE NOT ENFORCING THE FEDERAL “NO-MONOPOLIES” LAWS -OR THE LOGICAL PROHIBITION ON “NON-PROFITS” CHARGING FEES FOR SERVICES OR EXPANDING INTO SHOPPING MALLS INCOME OPPORTUNITIES; APARTMENT CONDO’S INCOME OPPORTUNITIES OR OFFICE BUILDING/LEASING INCOME PROPERTIES, LONG-TERM STAY OR TEMPORARY CLINICAL REHAB FACILITIES ETC., ETC., ETC., AND STILL BE ABLE TO FALSELY CLAIM ALL THESE UNDER A FRAUDULENT UMBRELLA OF “NON-PROFIT” TAX STATUS ! ! ) NOW, THAT FINALLY OFF MY CHEST…..BACK TO, “BANKS LOANING OUT MONEY TO INDIVIDUALS”…..CREATE CASH FLOWS INTO BUSINESS AND INDIVIDUAL BANK ACCOUNTS, AS THE BANK SUPPLIES MONEY TO THE INDIVIDUALS, AS AN ADDITION TO THEIR PAYROLL INCOME, TO BUY THE “NATIONAL GNP GOODS AND SERVICES” THE INDIVIDUAL, THROUGH CONSUMER SPENDING, IS THE ONE WHO THEN SUPPLIES THE PAYROLL DOLLARS AND ALL THE COSTS OF THE BUSINESS, REQUIRED BY THE BUSINESS TO OPERATE, AND PRODUCE THE GOODS AND SERVICES, SELL THEM AND RECIEVE A RETURN A PROFIT ON THE RETURN TRIP BACK “UP”, OF THE CASH FLOW ROUTE. THIS IS THE “U-TURN” OF OUR CAPITALISTIC ECONOMY. THE “DOWN-FLOW OR INCOME DISPURSEMENT” IS THE “ARTERY-SIDE” OF OUR CAPITALISTIC ECONOMY’S “CIRCULATORY SYSTEM”, THE “DOWN-FLOW OF “MONEY FLOWING FROM THE HEART OF HONORABLE, ETHICAL EMPLOYERS AND PRODUCERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES. IT IS THE FAIRLY EARNED “DISPERSABLE ECONOMY/SPENDABLE CASH” TO THE MASSES. ONCE RECIEVED, AT THE BOTTOM OF THE “DOWN-FLOW”, THE MASSES SPEND THEIR SPENDABLE CASH, CREATING THE “BOTTOM CURVE OF THE U-TURN” AND INITIATING THE “UP” SIDE, OR THE “INFUSION OF CASH, THROUGH SPENDING AND THE COLLECTION OF PROFITS”, TO BUSINESSES AND BANKS. THIS “U-TURN” PUTS MONEY WITH PROFIT, FROM SPENDING BY THE CONSUMER, BACK INTO THE SELLERS BANK ACCOUNTS, ON THE “UP” TURN OF THE U-TURN, (THE MORE WE SPEND…THE MORE OUR ECONOMY ENJOYS AN “UP TURN” ALSO!) WHICH DEMANDS MORE PRODUCTION/REPLACEMENT OF “SOLD GOODS”, WHICH GIVE CONTINUED PROVISION OF PAYROLL CASH AND CONTINUED INDIVIDUAL INCOME FOR “SPENDABLE CASH”…… “WHICH DEMANDS MORE PRODUCTION/REPLACEMENT OF “SOLD GOODS”, ETC., ECT, ETC. BUT IT ALL RESULTS IN A HEALTHY CONTINUOUS FLOW AND “CIRCULATION OF CASH” OR “FAIR DISTRIBUTION OF CASH” THROUGH OUR ECONOMY. EVERYONE HAS OBTAINED EVERYTHING THEY NEED, AS THE CASH FLOW PASSES “DOWN” THE ARTERIES THROUGH THE SYSTEM TO THEM AND THEY SPEND IT AND PASS IT BACK “UP” THROUGH THE VEINS, OR “GOLDMINES OF CONSUMER SPENDING” THEY HAVE PROVIDED FOR BUSINESS AND BANKS. MEANWHILE, THE U.S. TREASURY DEPT., WHICH IS DIFFERENT FROM THE “FED”, BECAUSE IT IS THE “ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT” SECTOR OF OUR “CITIZEN-OWNED DEMOCRACY”, AND IT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR “CITIZEN-APPROVED SPENDING” ON PAYROLL, NATIONAL JUDICIARY FUNCTIONS, MATERIALS/MAINTENANCE, RESEARCH, VARIOUS GRANTS AND FORIEGN AFFAIRS, IN OUR DEMOCRATIC/U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF A GOVERNMENT “OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE” ! THE “PEOPLE” OWN “ALL” THE MONEY ! ! THE “GOVERNMENT” HAS ONLY AS MUCH MANAGEMENT DECISION AND CONTROL, AS THE “PEOPLE” APPROVE OF. THEY “DO NOT” OWN THE COUNTRY OR THE PEOPLE, AND CANNOT CONDUCT ANY ACTIVITY THAT THE PEOPLE DO NOT APPROVE OF ! ! THEY HAVE ONLY OUR PAID-IN TAXES TO FUNCTION WITH ON MANAGING THE BUDGETS OF OUR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSIGNMENTS TO THEM….THEY “WORK FOR US” ! ! ALL THESE “FEDERAL EXPENSES”, WHICH CREATE THE FEDERAL BUDGET, HAVE BEEN FAR TOO INEFFICIENT WITH INAPPROPRIATE SPENDING AND POOR JOB PERFORMANCE WHICH SENDS THEM TO THE BANK, AS A CUSTOMER, NEEDING “LIQUID CASH”, TO PROP UP THEIR “VIRTUAL-GLOBAL SANTA CLAUS” IMAGE. THIS HAS RESULTED IN A “NATIONAL DEBT” AND TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN INTEREST PAYMENTS, TO THE BANKS, (BECAUSE THEY CANNOT AFFORD TO MAKE THE WHOLE MONTHLY PAYMENT, AND GET PERMISSION TO JUST AT LEAST COVER THE MONTHLY INTEREST DUE……REMEMBER THOSE DAYS?) . THUS, THE BANKS ARE NOT GETTING THE “PAY BACK” ON THE “PRINCIPAL” AMOUNTS OF THEIR U.S. TREASURY LOANS RETURNED, “IN A TIMELY MANNER”, AND HAVE TO KEEP GOING BACK TO THE FED, TO GET MORE “CASH FLOW FUNDS”; TO COVER THE DEMANDS OF THE BUSINESSES AND INDIVIDUAL CONSUMERS, WHICH WILL GIVE CONTINUITY TO THEIR PROFIT INCOME OPPORTUNITIES. THE U.S. TREASURY IS ONE OF THE “BAD INVESTMENTS” THAT THE BANKS HAVE BEEN MAKING! I HEARD THAT WE MAY HAVE GOTTEN A “POOR CREDIT REPORT” AND HAD TO GO TO CHINA, FOR A U.S. TREASURY LOAN, BUT THIS IS ONLY “HEARSAY” AS FAR AS I CAN TELL. BUT, YOU CAN SEE BY THE CYCLE, THAT THIS COUNTRY DEPENDS ON “EVERYBODY” HAVING “SPENDABLE CASH”, AND “EVERYBODY” PAYING THEIR FAIR SHARE OF TAXES AND A FAIR MARKET VALUE PAYROLL FOR PROVIDING “SPENDABLE CASH”. THIS IS THE ONLY WAY TO MAINTAIN A “FREE-ENTERPRISE, FREE-DEMOCRACY, CAPITALISTIC ECONOMY” AND CONTINUITY OF “NATIONAL GNP GOODS AND SERVICES (GROSS NAT’L PRODUCT-I DON’T CARE WHAT YOUR NEW NAME FOR IT IS, THIS IS WHAT IT REPRESENTS…AND ALWAYS WILL) ! NOW, DOES THAT MEAN THAT ALL THESE DECADES, THAT THE U.S. TREASURY HAS BEEN PUMPING BENEFITS AND TAX BREAKS TO THE CORPORATIONS, THAT THEY WERE PROVIDING “THE BEST FINANCIAL PROTECTION” FOR THE COUNTRY? NOT ! THE CORPORATIONS HAVE BEEN “BACK-POCKETING” THOSE WIND FALLS AND AIDES, TO THEIR CEO’S AND BONUS PROGRAMS AND NOT “FAIRLY DISTRIBUTING” THEM TO STOCK HOLDERS, EMPLOYEES OR BUDGET MINDED CONSUMERS ! BUZZZ! ! A “COG IN THE WHEEL” OF THE CASH FLOW…..NOW ALL THOSE WHO WERE NOT CONSIDERED, GIFTED, TAX RELIEVED OR CASH ENHANCED ARE BELOW THE “AVAILABLE SPENDABLE CASH” REQUIREMENT AND THEIR PURCHASING SLOWS, STOCK INVESTMENT DROPS (WHO WANTS TO HAVE THEIR INVESTMENT MONEY TIED UP IN AN ENDEAVOR THAT NEVER PAYS ANYTHING BACK ?) AND ALL EXPANSION, “NEW STARTS” STOP. HENCE, A “RECESSION” IN THE ECONOMY. BUT THINGS ARE STILL OPERATING AT A MIDDLE, LOW PROFIT LEVEL AND CAN COME BACK. BUT WAIT….THIS IS 2009, AND THEY ARE STILL PUMPING AND PRIMPING “ONLY THE CORPORATE SIDE”, OF A “U-TURN” ECONOMICAL NON-SOLUTION, THAT NEVER COULD STAND A CHANCE OF SUCCESS, BECAUSE OF BASIC CORPORATE SELFISH PHILOSOPHIES AND INEFFICIENT SPENDING, BONUSING AND BACK-POCKETING OF THE CASH FLOW NECESSARY TO BE MOVED, IN ADEQUATE AMOUNTS, DOWN THE “ARTERIES” TO REACH THE MASSES OF INDIVIDUAL CONSUMERS, AT THE BOTTOM “U-TURN”, WHERE IT TURNS “UPWARD” AND BEGINS TO INFUSE THE “VEIN” SIDE, OR “UP-TURN” OF THE PROFIT COLLECTING SEGMENT OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC CIRCULATORY SYSTEM. ALL THIS TIME THE BENEFITS, THE TAX BREAKS, THE REFUSAL TO INCREASE MINIMUM WAGE AND CONTINUOUS REFUSAL TO SUPPORT OF FAIR MARKET VALUE OF INCOME, IN PROPORTION TO THE OPPORTUNITY COST OF THE PERSONAL SKILL AND TIME INVESTED, HAVE BLOCKED THE PROVISION FAIRLY EARNED “SPENDABLE CASH” AVAILABLE TO THE MASSES FOR THEM TO “CONSUME GOODS”. WE HAVE BEEN CUTTING OFF AND STARVING “OUR UP-LINE” ! THE PROFITS CANNOT BE REALIZED, UNTIL THE “MASSES” SPEND MONEY ! ! DO THEY REALLY WANT PRESIDENT OBAMA TO BELIEVE THAT A NATIONAL ECONOMY CAN BE SUFFICIENTLY NURISHED ON “LATTES AND LUXURY PURCHASES”, BY THE FEW AT THE TOP OF THE UPPER CLASSES OF CORPORATE EXECUTIVES, WITH BULGING BACK-POCKETS ? OR DO THEY FOOLISHLY BELIEVE THAT THEY CAN CONVINCE HIM THAT THIS COULD CONTINUE FOREVER, OR BE REPAIRED BY JUST CONTINUING TO MAKE THE LOWER INCOME MASSES DO ALL THE WORK, PAY ALL THE TAXES AND PRIVATLY CARRY THE ENTIRE BURDEN OF LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL BUDGETS ON THEIR OWN BACKS ALL BY THEMSELVES, WITH ONLY “THE CRUMBS” THAT ARE FINALLY TOSSED DOWN TO THEM? THE CORRUPT POLITICIANS SAY, “WELL LET’S JUST “TELL” THEM THAT WE ARE DOING SOMETHING GREAT FOR THEM!”…..DON’T THEY THINK WE NOTICE, WHEN THAT “SOMETHING GREAT” NEVER ARRIVES? I AM HOMELESS, MEDICALLY DISABLED, WHITE, FEMALE, AMERICAN-BORN CITIZEN, WHO PAID TAXES FOR 45 YEARS DOING WORK IN HONORABLE CAREER FIELDS AND IS NOW DEPENDANT ON MEDICAL DISABILITY SOCIAL SECURITY INCOME……..I DIDN’T EVEN RECIEVE A “BUSH SPENDABLE CASH CHECK” ! ! MAYBE, CORRUPT EMPLOYEES JUST DECIDED THAT I DID NOT MEET THE CRITERION……………… SURELY YOU JEST ! I HAVE FAITH THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA WILL CHANGE EVERY PAST HABIT OF PROBLEM SOLVING AND BE THE FIRST IN 50 YEARS TO REFUSE TO ALLOW THE “RAPING OF A NATION” TO CONTINUE. 2/25/09 – NOW FOR SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS FOR OUR ECONOMIC RECOVERY:

1. FIRST AND FOREMOST – GET OUT OF IRAQ ! THE DAILY COST, BEING INCURRED THERE PRESENTS THE LARGEST CORRECTION EXISTING ON WASTED BUDGET MONEY. WE ARE PASSING G.I. PAYROLL MONEY, AND EXPENDITURES ON FOOD, WATER, SUPPLIES AND EXTRA-SUPPLEMNETARY PERSONNEL OVER TO BE SPENT IN IRAQ. WE ARE ONCE AGAIN PULLING CASH FLOW DOLLARS OUT OF OUR OWN SYSTEM AND BUILDING UP SOMEONE ELSE’S TREASURY. IRAQ HAS OIL WELLS ! THEY CAN STABALIZE THEIR OWN ECONOMY, IF LEFT WITH FULL CONTROL OVER IT !

2. MAKE PEACE IMMEDIATELY WITH IRAN ! THE IRANIANS NEVER DID ANYTHING, EXCEPT RESPOND WITH ANGER AT THE INTENTIONAL INSTIGATION OR INSULT FROM THE U.S. THEY ARE UNFAIRLY BEING “VILLIANIZED” BECAUSE THEY HAVE NUCLEAR CAPABILITY. SO WHAT ? SO DO DOZENS OF OTHER COUNTRIES, WHO WANT TO DEVELOPE A SENSE OF SECURITY AGAINST THREATS FROM OTHERS, WHO HAVE DEVASTATING WEAPONS! THESE PEOPLE WERE LOOTED , BY THE U.S., WHEN WE PLACED AN EMBARGO AGAINST THEM AND SEIZED THEIR PRIVATE CITIZEN MONEY FROM U.S. BANKS. DID WE EVER GIVE THAT MONEY BACK? HOW MANY PRIVATE CITIZEN TRAGEDIES DID WE CREATE, WITH LOST COLLEGE FUNDS, RETIREMENT FUNDS, BUSINESS INCOME OR SAVINGS TO OPEN A PRIVATE BUSINESS ETC. ETC. ETC. DO THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO VIEW US AS “THE GREAT SATAN” ? WE HAVE ACTED LIKE DEMONS AND DESERVE THE INSULT. THESE PEOPLE ARE THE DIRECT 100% BLOOD DESCENDANTS OF THE PERSIAN EMPIRE ! KINGS, THAT RULED ALL OF RUSSIA, MID-EAST, FAR EAST, EUROPE AND INDIA ! THEIR DNA CONTAINS INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITY, THAT WE U.S. “MONGRELS” CAN ONLY DROOL OVER, YET WE HAVE THE ARROGANCE TO TREAT THEM AS STREET RATS AND CRIMINALS! IT IS EMBARRASSING. PAY THEM IMMED., EVERYTHING WE LOOTED AND BEG FORGIVENESS WITH A SINCERE, STRONG AND PERMANENT BRANCH OF THE OLIVE TREE. WE NEED THEIR ALLIANCE AND FRIENDSHIP AND FORGIVENESS.

***(2) ARRANGE MEETINGS, BETWEEN IRAN AND IRAQ AND SUPPORT THEIR TALKS OF AN AGREEMENT FOR IRAN TO BECOME “PROTECTORATE” OF IRAQ ! THEY HAVE MORE INTEREST, IN THE STABILITY OF IRAQI GOVERNMENT AND SAFE BORDERS THAN THE U.S. DOES. IRAQ IS ON THEIR BORDER. AND THEY ARE BOTH PERSIAN ! IRAN HAS OIL WELLS TOO, AND DOES NOT NEED THEIR MONEY OR ANY FUNDING TO BE “PROTECTORATE”. THEY WOULD WELCOME THE ACCESS TO PROTECT THE STABILITY OF THEIR OWN BORDER AND GOVERNMENT. THE U.S. DOES NOT EVEN SPEAK THE LANGUAGE! HOW THE HE– CAN YOU CONDUCT A WAR OR A PEACE KEEPING ASSIGNMENT, WHEN YOU HAVE TO WAIT FOR AN INTERPRETOR TO TELL YOU IF YOU ARE BEING THREATENED OR INVITED TO DINNER ? ! THIS HAS BEEN AN INSANE OVER-STAY TO A MISSION THAT SAVED THE SHIA PEOPLE FROM TIERENY AND SHOULD HAVE TIPPED THE HAT AND GOT THE HECK OUT OF THERE IMMED. INSTEAD OF PLAYING SAND TREK WARS, “ATTACK AND OCCUPATHION BY THE PITHIFUL” ! THE IRANI’S CAN INSTANTLY DICIPHER THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A RESIDENT AND AN INFILTRAITOR, BY THE LOCAL ACCENT AND DIALECT. THEY WILL NOT BE DECIEVED OR BUFFALOED, AS THE U.S. HAS BEEN. THEIR TIME WOULD BE 1000% MORE PRODUCTIVE AND SUCCESSFUL. THEY ARE ALSO SHIA……THE PEOPLE WE WENT THERE TO SAVE FROM THE EVIL SUNNI “BATHE PARTY” DICTATORSHIP ! AND IF ALL THIS, HAS NOT CONVINCED YOU THAT I GIVE THE BEST SUGGESTION, THINK OF THIS………..TODAY’S NEWS REPORTED THAT 2 U.S. GI’S AND THEIR INTERPRETOR WERE GUNNED DOWN BY IMPOSTER’S OF IRAQI POLICE, IN THE CITY OF “NINAVEH”. DO YOU NO WHAT “NINAVEH” IS FAMOUS FOR ? IT IS THE CITY OF RESIDENCE OF “JONAH” WHO SPENT 3 DAYS IN THE BELLY OF THE WHALE ! JONAH WAS WARNED, BY GOD, THAT THE PEOPLE OF NINAVEH WERE TOO REBELLIOUS AND WOULD BE DESTROYED IF THEY DO NOT REPENT. JONAH WENT BACK TO THE PEOPLE AND GAVE THEM THE WARNING AND THEY REPENTED AND WERE SPARED, FROM THE DESTRUCTION BY GOD, BECAUSE THEY REPENTED AND BECAUSE JONAH WAS OBEDIANT AND TOOK THE WARNING TO THEM. VIOLENCE AND REBELLION ARE FORBIDDEN IN THIS REGION OF “EXTRA” ORDINARY HISTORICAL VALUE AND ANTIQUITY. IT IS THE LAND OF THE DAWNING OF CIVILIZATION. OF SODOM, GOMMORAH, BABYLON, NINAVEH, POSSIBLY EDEN, HOME OF ABRAHAM, LOT, JONAH, ISSAC, ISHMAEL AND MANY MORE. (BY THE WAY, HOW DO I KNOW THAT IT WAS “NINAVEH” IN THE STORY OF JONAH, SINCE IT WAS NOT NAMED, IN THE HOLY BIBLE ?……….IT IS NAMED IN THE STORY OF JONAH, IN THE HOLY QURAN ! THIS IS THE HISTORICAL OLD TESTIMATE, OF THE PEOPLE IN THE LAND, DOCUMENTED IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE LAND. WE NEED TO GET OUT OF THERE AND LEAVE THIS LAND TO THE PEOPLE WHO BELONG THERE. WE ARE NOT QUALIFIED TO ADVISE THEM, AND ONLY DO THEM POSSIBLE HARM TO TEACH OR SUPPLY METHODS OF WAR. THIS IS THE LAND OF GOD’S WAR, AND WE NEED TO GET THE HE– OUT OF THE WAY ! WE HAVE BEEN HELPING THE WRONG PEOPLE (SUNNI) AND DOING NOTHING BUT STIRRING UP PROBLEMS.

3. BRING OUR BOYS HOME IMMEDIATLEY ! AND DO NOT FOOLISHLY BRING THEM IN LAYERS THAT LEAVE FEWER AND FEWER BEHIND, WAITING THEIR TURN AND HOPING THEY DON’T GET PICKED OFF AS A SACRIFICIAL LAMB, JUST BEFORE THEIR TURN! BRING THEM HOME FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD, AND PUMP THOSE PAYROLL DOLLARS AND MAINTENANCE DOLLARS RIGHT INTO OUR OWN ECONOMY! KEEP THEM ON FEDERAL PAYROLL AS REPLACEMENT CORRUPT GOVERNMENT CIVILIAN WORKERS, REPLACEMENT FOR CORRUPT LOCAL POLICE, REPLACEMENT FOR INVESTIGATORS, DOING LEG WORK ON MILLIONS OF CASES OF FRAUD, TERRORISM, EXTORTION, KIDNAPPING, MURDER, GENOCIDE, IDENTITY THEFT, INTERNET WMD TERRORISM ETC., ETC., ETC. WE NEED LOYAL ABLE-BODIED AMERICANS RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW!
4. DO AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION ON STATE GOV. SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT THAT ARE ALLOWING CORRUPT EMPLOYEES TO BECOME AND REMAIN HOMELESS, WITH GOV. RENT SUPPLEMENTS GOING TO THEIR COUSINS AND GOV. S.S AND DISABILITY FUNDING BEING EMBEZZELED FROM THE POOREST AND IN MOST NEED OF ASSISTANCE. GET ALL THE MASSES HOUSED AND SUPPLIED WITH FINANCIAL PROVISION, ADEQUATE TO THE COST OF LIVING INDEX OF THEIR REGION…..NOT LOWER!
5. INCREASE MINIMUM WAGE TO ABOVE POVERTY LEVEL INTO FAIR MARKET VALUE PAYMENTS ADEQUATE TO SUSTAIN INDEPENDANCE WITHIN COST OF LIVING REQUIREMENTS. “POVERTY” SHOULD NOT EXIST FOR SOMEONE WORKING 40 HOURS A WEEK !
6. INVESTIGATE ALL “NON-PROFITS” AND START COLLECTING THOSE UNPAID FAIR-SHARE TAXES DUE!
7.CANCEL ALL FORIEGN AIDE A.S.A.P. WE ARE NOT IN A POSITION TO SUSTAIN THE DECEPTION OF BEING “SANTA CLAUSE” TO THE WORLD. IN MOST CASES, THE INITIATION OF IT HAS BEEN A MANIPULATION, SET UP BY OUR ENEMIES, TO FUND ANTI-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES, SOMETIMES SPLITTING A COUNTRY IN HALF, WHILE THE 2 HALVES OCCULTLY WORK AS PARTNERS AND SPLIT THE FORIEGN AID! WE HAVE BEEN MANIPULATED AND LURED INTO SENDING OUR MILITARY PROTECTION AND OUR MONEY AWAY FROM THE U.S. BORDERS THEY ARE INTENDED FOR.
8. INVESTIGATE AND CANCEL FREE GOVERNMENT GRANT MONEY WHERE EVER POSSIBLE. IT IS NEEDED, BUT HAS BEEN SO ABUSED AND CORRUPTLY HANDED OUT, THAT A TOTAL RE-WRITE IS NECESSARY ON IT FUTURE CONTINUATION.
9. TURN THE CIA AND FBI INTO HONORABLE, LOYAL, AMERICAN HUMANS AGAIN. GET THEM OUT OF ESPIONAGE AND OTHER WORKS OF DEMONIC DECEPTION, WHERE SOME OF THEM HAVE BEEN GOING INSANE AND JOINING THE CRIMINALS THEY IMITATE AND IMPOSTER. THEY HAVE BEEN LOSING THEIR REALITY CONCEPTS AND CONFUSING THE HONORABLE AMERICANS AS “THE ENEMY” AND HELPING THE CRIMINALS THAT THEY TRY TO IMPOSTER AND IMITATE. SOME HAVE BEEN INSTIGATING CIVIL CHAOS, IN OTHER COUNTRIES, FOR SO LONG, THEY ARE NOW TRYING TO MOUNT THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT TAKE-OVERS, UNASSOCIATED WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT INTENTIONS OR DIRECTIVES, THEY ARE A DANGER TO THE SAFETY OF U.S. CITIZENS AND CITIZENS OF THE GLOBE. THE PHILOSOPHY AND PRACTICE OF PRETENDING TO BE EVIL, TO SPY ON EVIL, MUST BE STOPPED. THEY ARE BEING SUCKED INTO A VAST CAULDRON OF UNCONTROLLABLE MANIPULATION THAT IS MANAGED AND CONTROLLED BY THE GREATER EVILS THAT USE THEM THEN, TO DO EVEN FURTHER HARM TO THE U.S. YOU CANNOT TRUST REPORTS TURNED IN BY THOSE UNDERCOVER, BECAUSE THEIR COVER WAS INFILTRATED THE MOMENT THEY CREATED IT AND THEY HAVE ONLY BEEN PAWNS IN A DEVILS GAME.

10. MANDATE A “NO HOMELESS ENVIRONMENTS, FOR THE HOMELESS” WE ARE BEING WAREHOUSED LIKE CATTLE, BEING PRODDED INTO THE SLAUGHTER BINS. THE PHONEY NON-PROFITS THAT RECIEVE GOV. FUNDING EITHER HAVE NO BEDS AND COLLECT THE FUNDING FRAUDULENTLY, BY JUST GIVING REFERRALS THAT CAN BE LOOKED UP IN ANY PHONE BOOK, AND THEN POSSIBLY STEALING AND SELLING YOUR IDENTITY. THE FACILITIES, THAT DO HAVE BEDS ARE OPERATED LIKE PRISONS AND FORBID ALL HUMAN FREE CHOICE OR DIGNITY. IF YOU HAVE AN HONORABLE HISTORY, AND ARE JUST OUT OF WORK, AND GOT EVICTED, BEFORE CORRUPT STATE OFFICIALS WOULD FREE-UP YOUR UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION, YOU ARE STILL THROWN IN WITH A FRIGHTENING MIX OF ADDICTS, ALCOHOLICS AND CRIMINALS ORDERED TO SPEND TIME THERE BEFORE TOTAL RELEASE FROM PRISON SUPERVISION. I PERSONNALY REFUSE TO EXPOSE MYSELF TO THIS UNHEALTHY, FRIGHTENING ENVIRONMENT OR ABUSE AND CHOSE TO STAY IN THE STREET, ALL NIGHT EVEN THROUGH THE FREEZING WINTERS. I CAN SMOKE ANYTIME I CHOOSE, NO ONE BARKS AT ME OR TELLS ME WHEN I AM ALLOWED TO EAT OR SLEEP OR TEND TO MY PERSONAL HYGIENE. THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR WAREHOUSING PEOPLE IN CRISIS IN STRESSFUL, DANGEROUS ENVIRONMENTS.

THEY SHOULD NOT EVEN BE ASKED TO GIVE PERSONAL INFO TO A FUNDED AGENCY WHO HAS NO BEDS.

THEY SHOULD NOT BE FORCED TO RESIDE WITH CRIMINAL ELEMENTS OF SOCIETY

THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO BE SEPARATED INTO TEMPORARY GROUP PROCESSING HOUSES WAITING WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE OR WITHOUT REHAB ISSUES AND HAVE COMPATIBLE HISTORIES OF HONORABLE TAX-PAYING CITIZEN. IF THEY HAVE REHAB ISSUES, THEY SHOULD BE WAITING IN A REHAB GROUP LINE, NOT GENERAL POVERTY CAUSED HOMELESSNESS.

THE WAIT SHOULD BE NO MORE THAT 3 DAYS AND THE MOVE SHOULD BE TO INDEPENDANT HOUSING, WITH JOB/INCOME ASSISTANCE TO BE ACCOMPANIED WITH HOUSING, BEFORE A SUCCESS OR COMPLETION OF ASSISTANCE CAN BE CREDITED, NOT GROUP HERDING WITH NO JOB/INCOME ADVOCACY AND IN SOME INSTANCES, EVEN BLOCKAGE FROM INDEPENDANCE AND THEREFORE HELD AS RANSOM FOR GOV. FUNDING QUOTAS!

THERE IS SO-O-O-O MUCH CORRUPTION AND ABUSE, WE NEED INVESTIGATION AND COMPLETE REFORM.
BY DAWN NARET’, PITTSBURGH,PA, USA

“BUTTERFLIES ATE G. DUBYA”

•August 17, 2008 • 1 Comment
“BUTTERFLYS ATE G. DUBYA”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*******************************************************************

11-3-08 I APOLOGIZE, FOR THE INCONSISTENT TYPE AND STYLE EXIBITED HERE……..THE ORIGINALS HAVE ALL BEEN STOLEN AND REPLACED WITH FACSIMILIES BY THIEVES AND HACKERS THAT SET UP A DUPLICATE, OF MY BLOG AND THEN TAKE THE ORIGINAL AND LEAVE ME THEIR UNATTRACTIVE TWIN.

THIS SITE WAS OPENED TO ESCAPE THEIR TRESPASSES……….NOT YET ACHIEVED !

BUT WILL SEE THEM PROSECUTED, ONE DAY….BECAUSE I:

1. NEVER TYPE IN BLACK

2. NEVER ALIGN TEXT TO CENTER

3.NEVER LEAVE PHOTOS OUT OF LINE OR IN DISARRAY.

4. I ONLY USE FONT-TAHOMA-12PT-LEFT JUSTIFIED-BOLD, AND I NEVER ADD HTML FOR THIS, BECAUSE I HAVE IT ALREADY STORED ON THE ORIGINAL WORD DP SET-UP. THIS IDIOT HAS TYPED IN ALL THE WRONG PROGRAMMING ON EVERY PARAGRAPH !

I MAINTAIN A DOZEN BLOG SITES AND DO NOT HAVE MENTAL ISSUES THAT ARE EXIBITED BY THESE PLAIGERIZERS !

**************************************************************

HERE’S MY LITTLE BLOG SITE GUARD ……TO MAKE THEM THINK TWICE ABOUT TRESPASSING HERE!

******************************************************************

NOW  BEGINS:

 ”BUTTERFLIES ATE G. DUBYA”

30 JULY 2007 – Well, Well, Well, What would my wondering eyes should appear…but a news article explaining the kind and friendly hospitality, being received by a pair of paint-ball looking recreationists who visited the National Guard Military Training Camp, in Indiantown Gap, Pa.
 

They brought their “Butterfly Nets”, and were receiving an invite to; “spend the day and roam the grounds all you like” from a magnanimous Lt. Col…… who should be strip seached for enemy warfare training paraphernalia and anti-American biological warfare training films

 

Now why shouldn’t the nice men have a free run of the camp????? 

 

 

 

 

 

SOME PAINT-BALLER PAINTED MY SKIN HEAD WHILE I WAS ASLEEP !!!

 

 

ME TOO ! !

 

 

“MAYBE, BECAUSE THEY PUT THIS GLOBAL GREENIZIDE ONE ON ME…? DO I HAVE TO HANG WIT THEM NOW, AND GO ROUND PICKING UP LITTER ? ? “

 

NO ! ! ITS Because…NUMNUTS !….they told the nice LT. Col. That they are butterfly study people. The one said he was a biology scientist and t’other one said he was a wildlife manager person. Welllllll that sounds nice and in’cent right ?

WRONG !! One who studies insects is named a “IkTHE O’THERJIST”(“Ichtheologist”- hello…I’m her spell-check and I can’t stand one more gross grammatical abortion of our language…I truly Might BITE HER!) ,…and they don’t have nottin ta do wit scientists. They are strikly BUGGY PEOPLE. And Mr. Wildlife don’t even no that butterflies are BUGS!!There they were, with their 6 foot long butterfly poles, wit nets on the end, justa roamin around the 17,000 acres playin “MAPMAN AND ROBIN” !!I LOST MY BUTTERFLY NET MAPMAN….”DON’T WORRY, I GOT ‘NOTHER WEAPON RAT CHER ! WE’LL WATCH EM MISS DAWN…AIN’T NO NUMNUT SQUIRRELS ‘ROUND CHER…JIS HUMANS!”

What the H- – -(OK…HAY!) was this “lower than a dumbsh – -” thinkin he was doin ?!!

Our BOYS are at that camp and this “BIMBO” breaches security and invites 2 questionaby honest civi – strangers to mosey ‘round if they like!

Did you take a LOOK at their butterfly net?? It had a 18-24 inch long, cone shaped net at the end of a 5-6 ft. pole. That NET…if filled with a plastic liner, could be thrown over the head of an unsuspecting G.I. and with a quick twist/spin of the pole, could tighten up at the neck, DRAG HIM INTO THE BUSH AND leave the attacker a safe 5-6 ft. away at ta ‘othah end of the pole….holdin down the suffocating victim….SO, YOU GOTTA WEAPON BUBBA !!!

What kind of High-Alert, Home-Land-Security, Military Preparedness could NOT SEE this danger????!!!!! Can’t you guys do anathin without the womenfoke guiding ya?

Then I cum ta find out that they bin doin this since 1998 and now they bring all their little friends for the day.

By now…they have mos’ likely mapped all 17,000 acres, know every path and connection, know every building function and location and inventory, know every personnel count during ev’ry hour of 24 surveilence, have mini cams set up in ev’ry sector, have tape recorders set up in ev’ry phone, bunk, mess and officers quarters and office, have ev’ry butterfly sprayed with a contamination residue that slowly penetrates the skin and results in blood poisoning or some horror or who knows how many more fatal trespasses an enemy of the US could accomplish with dimwits breaching security for civi-strangers.

Next…the best news…they have delivered butterflies to another military camp, just to see if they could survive boot…AND they already lined up a 3rd military post in Gettesburg, Pa to make it a “THIRD COLONY” (of butterflies? Or paint-ballers?) Can ya not see that suspicious circumstances exist here ?

Why military camps?

Why the most remote densely wooded camps?

Why the largest acreage that could, act’uly serve as a theater of civil war front, in the event of an aggressive take-over attempt ? ! !

I’m SO MAD about this, I can’t even take time to try to sound STUPID !!!

This is a prime example of how unequipped our “HOME-LAND-SECURITY” Dept. of airhead numnuts and airport skitzoids are, about realizing WHERE AND HOW they should be lookin at increasing security INSIDE OUR BORDERS!

The enemy is not goin ta be flyin US AIR !!

They are already here and can build anathis ya want ta waste more time on while yer lookin inside ev’ry ship cargo containers!!

They have so-o-o much ALREADY prepared…they barely haf ta wait.

;

Where the Hay are our troops?? OUT of town on assignment protectin other coun’ries people!!

No wonder the G.I.’S are gettin cranky !!! They sign on ta protect THIS coun’ry not risk their butts holdin down the firein at some other coun’ry asses and governments!

Their lives are bein risked and lost ….FOR WHATTTTT!!!!

Yes! This IS a BONAFIDE FEMALE writing this, 59 year old LADY, named DAWN NARET’, who is fightin the US front alone…with NO HELP…and I am NOT a male, pretending to be a female!!!!!

THAT would be THE one, who is the most predatory stalker, I have had to protect my identity from being COMPLETELY stolen by and/or at best even destroying my reputation and my health!!

I’ll fight them all, with the truth, if I have to.

Their terrorism, political manipulations and criminal activities are NOT sailing past ME as they are passing by those by who have about as much discernment and evaluating ability::

” as a turd looking for the flusher to get rid of the stink in the bathroom !!!” (-quote: Dawn Naret’ )

Get your dam noses out of the airports and get busy on the things that already ARE destroying this country and terrorizing our citizens.

If you really DON’T have a clue I’ll teach you, But only AFTER I show you all the physical injuries I have already sustained, IN REALITY on this civilian WAR front !!!!!!

BRING OUR BOYS HOME !!!! EV’RY LAST ONE OF THEM…THIS MINUTE!!! WE NEED THEM HERE…RIGHT HERE….

I am not comfortable with the “HOME FOR THE LATTE” HOME SECURITY FORCES! They are one track minded on the wrong track and don’t know squat about where are the citizens here most vulnerable to enslavement or injury!

I live it ev’ry day and I could write a book on all the anti-American activity occurring right here…right now…even in our government offices!

BY DAWN NARET’ 2007

********************************************************************************

 

to: jorie@pasen.gov

Below are examples of portions of communications SENT:

 

********************************************
Dear Senator Orie,
 
……….I am very impressed with the organizing you have accomplished with your smoke-free lobbying.
I agree that we all must make a great effort to end these health hazards for everyone. I would like to join you in a collaborative effort. Now that we have enormous attention and focus of the string-pullers on the issue, we must bring the lobbying into the core of the theater (of war) the toughest arena of all and begin, to zero in on the source of the hazard.
That, of course, would be the cigarette manufacturers. We must eliminate their freedom to produce and distribute a health hazard product. We must lobby to create laws that prohibit, COMPLETELY, their freedom to process chemicals and additives into tobacco products altogether.
We must give them NO ALTERNATIVE but to produce healthy organic products that will endanger no one’s health.
Studies have already proven that natural tobacco is not even addictive, let alone cancerous. It only contains a trace of nicotine, that is why, in my opinion, they add the chemicals, is to PRODUCE addiction. It does not occur naturally.
The tobacco plant, of itself, is not a toxic, addictive or poisonous plant. It is a natural, God created, domestic, green vegetation, ranking it the same as basil, parsley and oregano. Grasshoppers eat the leaves as the mainstay of their diet, including the nicotine.
The natural nicotine is actually of such a low level it is not even addictive to many humans or grasshoppers.
It is these chemicals that are dangerous to the health of organic, mammal humans, not the tobacco leaf.
Why then, are the manufacturers not properly addressing the problem, of health concerns, by eliminating the chemical additives and offering a clean, safe, organic product?
How many millions of dollars, a year, would they have already saved in law-suits?
How much of their profit could they have saved, on the overhead cost, of the chemicals?
How many customers could they have kept, if the product was not labeled a health risk?
How many new customers might be obtained, if the product were safe and even shown to have health benefits, when uncontaminated with chemicals?
All of God’s green creations contain health benefits. Even those thought to be dangerous.
Doctors now prescribe a green plant named cannabis, A.K.A marijuana, for over a dozen different ailments. At the turn of the century, circa. 1890, Doctors also used to prescribe cocaine for calming the nerves. It is also a natural plant.
When I was a private nurse for Miss Helen Clay Frick,
Pittsburgh , Pa , The family never threw anything away.
Among the bathroom medicine cabinet items was a leather pouch, of glass medicine vials, prepared by the family physician as an assortment of “might need remedies” while the family was on cruise to Europe and could not be treated by their private physician. Among the vials was one, full of white powder, labeled “cocaine – 1898″. Natural plants were always legal and accepted for medical treatment.
Cigarettes have been reported to ease, and in some cases, to stop the low to moderate chemical and or gas vapor induced lung and cardiac spasms. These spasms could cause instant death; in emphysema, asthma, C.O.P.D., CHF and cardiac arrhythmia patients.
I would like to see more research done on this, because I am convinced that the organic tissue, violently rejecting a chemical or gas vapor invasion, would be soothed by the counter-induction of organic vapor.
The positive, expandable components, of the organic, super ceding the densifying and contracting physics of the negative. But this is only my personal, scientific theory of how cigarettes could actually be serviceable, as a health benefit, if left untampered with.
If we could all do an honest facts reality check and stop the false information, and terroristic rhetoric, the smokers would be healthier, The non-smokers would be safe and secure from any paranoia of being around smokers or cigarettes, and the manufacturers would be free of law suits and diminishing market share profit percentages.
That would be the wisest solution for the satisfaction of everyone. And it would end the discrimination and dangers of paranoia.
There might be one unhappy camper left, and that would be the chemical manufacturers and pharmaceuticals sales to sick patients, but ….they created the additives, the harmful to humans insecticides, disinfectants, solvents, etc…etc…etc. To that, the wise old sage, “KhanDawnUs” say; “the dog who bites….could end up with bloody tail.”
I would hope that they would redirect their focus to preventative health enhancement, by producing safer protective products.

I personally wish to promote good health, extended life and the pursuit of happiness to every human. Lets all do a fact finding reality check and no one has to fear being banished 15 feet from the building.

We must erase the errors, committed against not only smokers, but against all humans and put an END to the violations of everyone’s constitutional; civil, and human rights, before they are a lost and obsolete memory of Democracy.

Thank you for smoking or not smoking…it is your right to choose.,

Dawn Naret’, Author of “We The People”, Web-site,
AT: www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com

P.O. Box 2315
Pittsburgh , PA 15230-2315

ADDITIONAL WEB SITES:
www.chagrinning.blogspot.com
www.dawnnaret.blog.com
www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com
www.dawnnaret.workpad.com

EMAIL:
text.reply2dn@gmail.com
reply2dn@gmail.com
dawnaret@yahoo.co.uk

**********************************************

BELOW ARE PORTIONS OF A RESPONSE, FROM SENATOR ORIE, AS FOLLOWS:

**********************************************

jorie@pasen.gov

from:

“Orie, Senator Jane” jorie@pasen.gov

to: Dawn Naret’ reply2dn@gmail.com
date: May 23, 2007 1:22 PM

subject:
RE: CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PATH PROTECTOR

mailed-by: pasen.gov

**************************************

“I definitely will look into——-and will have Kurt contact you to discuss further!” (END)

**************************************

 

JUNE 25,2007

BELOW IS A RESPONSE I RECEIVED FROM SENATOR JAY  COSTA, IN RESPONSE TO MY REQUEST THAT HE MOVE TO RESTRICT DANGEROUS ADDITIVES FROM BEING ADDED TO THE TOBACCO IN THE PROCESSING OF NON-DANGEROUS ORGANIC TOBACCO PRODUCTS. (IT APPEARS THAT A PORTION OF MY LETTER TO HIM HAS BEEN REMOVED):

Please redirect YOUR efforts from brow beating and discriminating against smokers, to protecting EVERYONE”S rights;
To purchase and consume legal products without censorship,
OR discrimination,
OR being criminalized,
OR having our children snatched, from our home, because the parents dare to smoke in privacy.
This movement has been INSANE………… TO SAY THE LEAST, AND THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR AN EXCUSE TO;
ERASE OUR FREEDOM,
ERASE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS,
ERASE OUR DEMOCRACY,
AND SABOTAGE OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT AND LOYALITY TO OUR COUNTRY, ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE OUTRAGEOUS PERSECUTIONS AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL DANGERS YOU ARE PROMOTING WITH YOUR CURRENT EFFORTS FOR A SMOKE-FREE AMERICA.
I ADVISE YOU TO REDIRECT YOUR FOCUS TO:
FREEDOM,
PROTECTION OF EVERYONE’S RIGHTS
AND PROTECTION OF EVERYONE’S HEALTH.
PLEASE PROMOTE A COMMUNIST-FREE AMERICA !!!
You don’t throw smokers out in the cold and you don’t try to criminalize their reputation OR steal their children.
Smoking is only ONE excuse, the enemies of freedom are using to erase democracy.
The next one could be an area that you are personally associated with, and see absolutely NO reason why they should be banishing , criminalizing and threatening to arrest you or take your children away from you………But this is the planned and active agenda of the enemies of Democracy.
You WILL be just as much VICTIMIZED, as smokers are today, if you do not join your fellow citizens, especially those who smoke, and demand protection of ALL OUR Constitutional rights.
Working WITH you, for a safer America,
Dawn Naret’
Forwarded Conversation
Subject: Re: CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PROTECTION PATH
————————

BELOW IS A RESPONSE I RECEIVED FROM SENATOR COSTA, IN RESPONSE TO MY REQUEST THAT HE MOVE TO RESTRICT TOBACCO MANUFACTURERS FROM ADDING THE DANGEROUS CHEMICALS AND ADDITIVES TO NATURALLY ORGANIC, NON-HEALTH THREATENING TOBACCO PLANT PRODUCTS
Forwarded Conversation
Subject: Re: CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PROTECTION PATH
————————

**************************************************************************

“MAKE ME LOOK LIKE A HUMAN….I DON’T WANT ANYONE TO KNOW I SMOKE ! ! “JUNE 25,2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

************************************************************************
From: PA Senator Jay Costa
To: reply2dn@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 2:52 PM

Dear Ms. Naret:

Thank you for contacting me to relate your thoughts regarding cigarettes and the current effort to ban smoking in public places in Pennsylvania.
I appreciate your interest in seeing cigarettes made without additives so that they would be less addictive and more healthful for all who encounter them.
I regret, however, that the Commonwealth does not have the power to regulate the contents of cigarettes.
Regulating products that are traded in interstate commerce, as cigarettes are, is the exclusive purview of the federal government. I encourage you to contact those who represent you in the U.S. Congress to relate your thoughts on this issue to them, since they are in a better position to address your concerns.
Again, thank you for taking the time to contact me about this issue. Please feel free to contact me if I can assist you in any way.
Sincerely yours,
Senator Jay Costa, Jr.
43rd District
JC
**********************************************
LETTER TO ALLEGHENY COUNTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MR. DAN “THE DRINK TAX MAN” ONORATO

( UNFORTUNATELY, I RECIEVED NO RESPONSE FROM MR. O……….
OR PITTSBURGH MAYOR, MR. LUKEY RAVENSTUKEY)
*********************************************
HERE’S A DOUBLE-HEADER

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
“DAM SECRETARY…..I TOLD HER TO NOTIFY ME IMMEDIATELY IF THIS LADY DAWN EVER HAS ANY SUGGESTIONS FOR ME, SHE HITS THE MARK EVERY TIME……I SEE THAT NOW ! ! “
(“GET THAT SECRETARY ON THE PHONE….ON THE “DOUBLE” BUCKO!”)

(jis practicing ball pitchin)

 

 

ball-practice

 

“HEY, MISS DAWN SENT US OVER…SAID YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN A LITTLE GAME ! ! “Friday, April 06, 2007
Open Letter To Dan Onorato -


Dawn Naret’
P.O. Box 2315
Pittsburgh, Pa 15230-2315

 

4-5-07
Dan Onorato, County Executive Director,
I tried to forward you a copy of a very important article, but this contact system would not accept the size of it. Please read my copy of it A.S.A.P. at:
http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/
This is not a typical letter to the Executive Director of County Government. It is being sent to you, for your protection. There is about to arrive, a stirring of angry demonstrations and revolts against violations of Constitutional Rights and discriminations against smokers.
It would be beneficial to you and your staff to read this very informative article and familiarize yourself with all of the valuable information, that could help you have clear confidence, to support smokers in the “Burn the Smoking Ban” conflict.
I realize that you could feel more obligation to support the preferences, of what you imagine, to be the majority of the constituent opinion. However, the majority often has cross-over voters, as you are aware.
If you are not able to influence the County “steam-rollers” to cease discrimination and abuse, and to get these illegal laws and policies completely off the books, in Pittsburgh City and County, you could very well witness a prime example of “Majority Leverage” going bad.
You are possibly not aware of just how illegal and discriminatory this new ban is and every rule or policy that tries to dictate the activity and choice of a consumer who is using a legal product, is an illegal policy.
And just as illegal and discriminatory is the on-going practice of loading unassociated taxes onto tobacco products, “where smokers have to pay to provide increased funding, but non-smokers do not contribute”.
I guarantee you, that 100% of the smoking voters will turn on any politician who supports the continuance of these abusive dictates and practices. Their numbers may be considered the minority, but the non-smoking majority may not approve of everything on your record, and could be crossing-over to the smokers’ side, at least on a general election debate. So, you cannot have a guarantee that their majority over smokers is a clear sailing majority acceptance of the ban and the continued abuses against the smokers.
A more appropriate and definitely more legal philosophy and policy toward non-smokers demands, would be the “if you don’t like it leave…” practice, advised for theaters of “XXX” rated film rights and porn shops in unwelcoming neighborhoods.
How have these unsavory businesses survived?? Remember? it was because of their Constitutional Right to choose and exist. Are we expected to have any LESS democratic democracy protection extended to honorable, working, citizens, who just happen to smoke cigarettes, a legal product to consume?
The Honorable Judge, requires that you contact him and officially withdraw requests for dictatorial smoking bans, limitations, restrictions, prohibiting/monitoring policies, laws, rules, discriminations, prejudices, as well as; harassment and obstruction practices, within your offices and illegal housing and employment discrimination being encouraged, by your office, based on erroneous assumption of freedom to permit, conduct or support these violations of constitutional rights of smokers.
Regards,
Dawn Naret’
Thank you for smoking or not smoking…it is your right to choose.,
Dawn Naret’, Author of “We The People” Web-site, www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com
P.O. Box 2315
Pittsburgh , PA 15230-2315

WEB SITES:
www.chagrinning.blogspot.com (“Chagrinning”)
www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com (“We The People”)
www.dawnnaret.blog.com (“58 year old Natural-Born Lady”)
www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com (“Hey Buddy, Can You Spare A Latte?”)
www.dawnnaret.workpad.com (“Fuel Cells for about 2 bucks”, “Joplin Paraditty”)
 

 

 

 

 

“THE CURRENT AMERICAN CIVIL WAR”

•August 9, 2008 • Leave a Comment


******************************************************

DAWN NARET’ IS SOLE OWNER AND SOLE AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG SITE.

DAWN NARET’ HOLDS FULL AND LEGAL COPYRIGHTS ON ALL COMMENTS AND COMMENTARY POSTED,

“COPY” AND PASTE URL OF THIS BLOG SITE, TO PULL UP AND VIEW ANYTIME:

http://www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com

******************************************************

DISCLAIMER:

ALL ARTICLES, ON THIS SITE ARE THE ORIGINAL WORK OF SOLE AUTHOR: DAWN NARET’

ANY (HTML) ADDED, THAT EXCEEDS THE USUAL PROGRAMMING OF “BLOGGER TEMPLATES” IS REJECTED, BY THE AUTHOR, INCLUDING CRIMINAL TRESPASS THAT ADDED (HTML) CO-AUTHOR OR EDITING CREDIT TO AN UNKNOWN HACKER VIA INITIALS OR NUMBER I.D.

*****************************************************

NOTICE:

ALL DAWN NARET BLOG SITES CONTAIN ORIGINAL COMMENTS AND COMMENTARY, WRITTEN BY THE OWNER, DAWN NARET’, AND ARE COPYRIGHTED WITH ALL LEGAL OWNERSHIP ENTITLED TO AN ORIGINAL AUTHOR, FROM THE FIRST DAY OF PUBLISHING.

YOU ARE WELCOME TO “COPY” (DO NOT CUT).

COPYING IS PERMITTED ONLY IF FULL CREDIT IS GIVEN, IN THE LEGAL AUTHOR’S NAME, WHEN QUOTING OR PRINTING.VARIATIONS WILL NOT BE FREE OF COURT CHARGES OF PLAGIARISM, FOR THEFT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, IF THE VARIATION CONTAINS MORE THAN 1% OF QUOTABLE WRITTEN WORK OR 1% OF THE CONCEPT PROCESS IS PARALLELED TO ORIGINAL WORK DONE BY DAWN NARET’.

*******************************************************

“QUOTE ‘THE DAWN’ EVERMORE…..”
“QUOTE THE DAWN…..EVERMORE……

LET THESE BE THE WORDS AND THE TRUTH OF MY PHILOSOPHY FOREVER ! !

“TO HEAR OR READ SOMEONE ELSES OPINION, IS PROOF OF ALIVENESS ONLY…..

TO MEMORIZE IT AND TELL OTHERS, IS A SIGN OF APEING ABILITY…..

TO EVALUATE IT AND SLICE OUT THE INACCURACIES OF IT, IS A SIGN OF INTELLIGENCE…..

TO PONDER, RESEARCH, ORGANIZE AND PROVE LOGIC AND THEN CREATE A MORE PERFECT COMPREHENSION, IS GENIUS”….

AN ORIGINAL THOUGHT BY DAWN NARET’ MARCH 2008

**********************************************************************

INDEX OF OTHER ITEMS PUBLISHED HERE:

*********************************************************

1. “PART 1 -” CHENEY EMBARRASSES WHITE HOUSE WITH PROPOSAL FOR PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD”

2. “I am in Danger – My Email has been blocked and on
outgoing and possibly diverted on incoming – and an
imposter uses my account 2/26/08

3. “Hats Off to an Honorable Elected Official” 8/15/07

4. “Military Videos” 8/09/07

5. “Monarch Butterfly – Causes Military Breach Of Security at
Indiantowngap Base 7/27/07

6. “Smoking Bans are UnConstitutional” 7/16/07

7. “Total Statement of the Case – Legal battle with PA Dept. Of
Unemployment 3/13/07 – (dates indicate when published
articles were moved to this blog)

****************************************************
NOW BEGINS:

“THE CURRENT AMERICAN CIVIL WAR”

THIS IS THE REAL DAWN NARET'

THIS IS THE REAL DAWN NARET

THE FOLLOWING COMMENTARY, “THE CURRENT AMERICAN CIVIL WAR”, IS AN ORIGINAL ALREADY PUBLISHED ON SEVERAL OF MY OTHER BLOG SITES,

(AS WAS
“CHENEY EMBARRASSES BUSH WHITE HOUSE WITH PROPOSAL FOR PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD”).

THIEVES AND SABATOURS ARE CONTINUING TO BLOCK THESE WORKS, OR FALSELY CLAIM THAT THEY AUTHORED THEM. I TEMPORARILY REMOVED THE PALESTINE PIECE, TO DETER THEIR MENTALLY ILL OBSCESSIVE COMPULSIVE SABOTAGING OF ITS APPEARANCE AND REMOVING LARGE CHUNK PORTIONS OF IT. PLEASE VIEW IT AT ONE OF MY OTHER POLITICAL SITES. DAWN NARET

PART – 3 ” THE CURRENT AMERICAN CIVIL WAR “

DIRECTLY BELOW IS A “NOT SO FLATTERING PHOTO” OF PRESIDENT BUSH. BUT IT EXPRESSES WHAT I IMAGINE, IS THE CONCERN, OR LACK OF IT, THAT OUR GOVERNMENT HAS FOR ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS.

PART – 3 ” THE CURRENT AMERICAN CIVIL WAR “

MARCH 2008, BY DAWN NARET’, PITTSBURGH, PA, USA

We have racial war stimulation occurring so badly, that the war includes blacks against blacks, who are tired of the radicals ruining the reputation of the honorable and studious blacks.

There are numerous, separate groups of organized blacks. They cannot be grouped together, because all of their goals, methods, leaders and motivations are manipulated differently, by the one common denominator who is pulling ALL THEIR STRINGS of ALL THEIR LEADERS.

How would I possibly get such an idea? I have witnessed patterns of activities, that looked like they had all attended the same training school, activities of corrupt employees in government, been victimized by corrupt employees, both inside and outside the government.

I have been to court and witnessed the demise of our judicial system, through illegal trespasses, and activities , of corrupt employees. I have heard, with my own ears, instructions and demands for trespasses and illegal activity.

I have suffered personally from trespass, and illegal activity. I have had to take personal cases, of complaints of injustice , to appeals courts and higher courts, in search of a judge who still follows correct judicial rules and decisions.

There is NO PARANOIA here. This is a very ugly experience of reality at its worst, when you discover that those, entrusted to protect you and your rights, are appearing to be partners in crime with your abusers.

In the black community, I communicate with people and again, read the newspapers, to discover, in their own words and actions, where they stand and what issues they are motivated to use as inspiration or excuses for their actions.

One example of a manipulated group, are blacks demanding government to provide compensation, for their lost opportunities, diminished ever since their ancestors were brought here as slaves. This is an excuse for demanding a HAND-OUT that goes back beyond their family records and documentation.

Who would instigate them to believe that such demands are entitled to response? Where would they get such stimulation to actually present themselves, to legal and government authorities, with such demands and usually with no evidence of ancestral association or ancestral injustice or injury sustained.

Why didn’t their parents provide them with the legacy they now demand from government? Were their parents slaves in the decades of the 1950’s, 60’s, 70’s or 80’s? The problem, in my opinion, and I am old enough to have lived through every one of them, and witnessed the events first hand, as a white child living in a black neighborhood, is that in in those days, there was a dependency on welfare.

A social services institution that actually provided so well, all those years, that welfare families would LOSE money, security and luxuries if they gave up welfare and and took low-income jobs.

It would have put them in the same misery as low-income, working white families, who received NO food stamps, NO medical coverage, NO supplemental rent assistance, NO increase to income with each new baby, NO opportunity to be stay-at-home-moms.

In fairness of “Why the heck are you complaining, when Whites suffered more disadvantages?”, I have to relate several examples. I was raised by my grandparents. Both worked low-income jobs. We had to pay FULL price of rent,, which thankfully in those days, still left a little for other needs, but not much because they worked for less than one dollar per hour(in the 1950’s)!

We also had to pay FULL price for groceries and often had pancakes or soup for supper, because there was no meat. We had to pay FULL PRICE CASH for medical treatment or hospitalizations, because we had no insurance.

Gratefuly, we found a Black doctor, who permitted us to make installment payments for medical care and check-ups for about $2-4 per house call and he would give us free samples of medicines needed, if he had them.

Sometimes, we didn’t have the $2 in the budget, even with installment payments, there was just nothing to spare, so he would accepy homemade bread.

But without his kindness, we would not have had a doctor available at all. And that proves we were not prejudice and that blacks could aspire to levels above welfare, IF they wanted it and IF they were willing to work for it.

They were not obstructed or prejudiced against and neither were the welfare people. They had a choice, in many instances, but chose the security of welfare, rather than challenge or opportunity.

In the 1960’s, minimum wage was $1.10 per hour and we still did not have medical coverage in low-income America but, we could join a group plan at work, with a deduction taken off our pay check. This is the era when I started working.
In the 1970’s, minimum wage was $1.35 per hour and we still did not get medical coverage unless we were full-time. Rent now had gone up over 20 years, but minimum wage increased by only 25 cents. Hardly any increase at all! I managed to get myself through nursing school in 1973, and made $2.42 per hour on my 1st nursing job.

It went to $1.65, at some long waiting point, but I ‘m not sure just when. Then, in the 1980’s, now the 3rd decade of minimum wage, it suddenly zoomed ahead to $3.65 per hour.

In 30 years of price increases on rent, utilities, insurance, groceries, clothes and misc. needs, we gained a wage increase of $2.55 per hour/over 30 years to cover expenses. We still didn’t have it a good as the welfare people.

In the 1980’s, they also entered the “Cut-throat Management” era. This is were they began to view the employee as the enemy and started the demise of Corporate America with such negative philosophies as “never let them know you like their work….they’ll only expect a raise” and “if we need to downsize, criticize and annoy them, until they quit voluntarily, so we don’t have to pay unemployment”.

They also started hiring for a maximum of 20-39 hours per week, so you could not be considered full time, and would never be eligible to receive benefits, including retirement plans, which put the baby-boomers at an unfair disadvantage compared to the previous decade where retirement funds were matched by the employer, but only in the better job levels.

In the 1990’s this was limited to degreed levels only, as were many actions that were more and more becoming discriminatory toward non-degreed workers.

Many markets, including the steel industry, went down in the early 1980’s. Many lost their jobs and homes and we entered a national economic recession, but tried to not admit it. Ex-employees did not qualify for welfare benefits, because the qualifiers were; how much money you made the year before.

They were told that they had made above the poverty line, and that had been too much to qualify for welfare, despite the fact that they were making NOTHING NOW!

That didn’t matter. some qualified for unemployment compensation and some became homeless. Policies became more cut-throat, and corrupt management became more predatory.

Many never got back to being employed full time, with benefits. Those jobs were now reserved for the people with degrees, and low-income people had no degrees.

If they wanted to go to college, they had to work 2 jobs and attend class as well. Some did this, most could not. They were children of working mothers, who could not possibly help them or baby-sit for them, or lend a hand with schedules as the welfare stay-at-home moms could.

The poor white workers had no stay-at-home moms and baby-sitting fees began to rise higher than the minimum wage. Some of the baby-sitters were stay-at-home welfare moms, illegally collecting income on the side and under the table, paying no income taxes. Dreams were layed aside and life long ruts of low-income continued.

Meanwhile, the N.A.A.C.P. was pushing for “Affirmative Action” and quota hiring. Whites were pushed aside to maintain quotas and the N.A.A.C.P. did not accept white, underpriveledged members.

We got no free legal assistance, no free lobbying, no efforts for more opportunity and higher-income, no shoo-in jobs at quota.

The N.A.A.C.P. did wonderful, miraculas things for their community. But only for a PORTION of their community. But, they were too prejudice to realize, that the poor whites in the low-rent neighborhoods were just as battered by the government discrimination, so there was never even a race issue going on.

It was selfish negative, capitalism trying to enslave and maintain access to low-overhead laborers for the wealthy.

The welfare people also picked up illegal side jobs in housekeeping, laundry, ironing, etc. and the wealthy paid no taxes, retirement funds or social security payments on their behalf.

The N.A.A.C.P. should have been color-blind, as they demanded whites to be, and pushed for all their issues for the poor blacks AND whites. It’s not like they could use the excuse that, “well they have plenty of help and don’t have it as bad as the blacks do”.

We had it worse, and still do not get any help.

This prejudice and lack of concern for the suffering whites raised its head, when the welfare system finally began pushing labor required programs, to reduce dependancy on welfare and motivate the seeking of opportunity.

They even created “shoo-in” jobs, for welfare people, in government departments and offices to jump-start their job security and weaning off welfare.

Meanwhile, the low-income, working whites, were now entitled to partial food stamps, but no “shoo-in” jobs, supplemental housing, income or medical assistance.

Also no Affirmative Action educational opportunities, no respect or fair, non-discriminatory treatment, when applying for work in government departments, which were now staffed and supervised by prejudiced, black, ex-welfare people, who were following a philosophy of taking care of their own and the heck with helping any whites.

Somehow, the black, ex-welfare people went brain-dead and decided, in their prejudice mind, that they were going to make things difficult for these whites, who always had it easy (??) did nothing to help them (??).

They over-looked, in their prejudice minds, that these people had already suffered MORE than they ever had, just through the lack of all the security that welfare had been providing for them.

These poor whites were the LAST people that they should have formed a prejudice against, or be abusive with their authority on.

These whites had never been IN a position to hurt any opportunities of the blacks and had received even LESS opportunities themselves, due to the abscense of race ‘minority” status, assistance of the N.A.A.C.P. and the rapidly evolving of neighborhood support networks including a “Rapid Communication” system for job openings and even soon-to-be job openings, in their government departments.

This communication system evolved into sometimes, militant, organized, black-empowerment societies, depending on what other associations the individual was connected to.

It evolved on different levels, with different goals, operations, financing and progress.

Meanwhile, the poor,working whites became eligible for Housing supplement, “Section 8″, if they only made minimum wage, which was and remains below poverty level.

But, they could only be processed, in many cases, after the prejudice, ex-welfare, turned corrupt employee, processed all their cousins and any other blacks who deserved help more, in their prejudice mind, than the whites.

I personally had this experience on 3 consecutive applications. I was told that their budget money was already depleted and that there would be a continued 2 year waiting list. I then watched the clerk take a call and inform a cousin that the money is coming in tuesday a.m. and to be here at 8:30 A.M. and the clerk would get them processed immediately.

I am disabled, homeless and sitting up all night, on a folding chair, waiting for a chance to lie down and at least have a place to die.

There is not much hope of healing. I just keep getting exposed to more and more contamination and injury. But the cousin, who probably was already in an apartment and had a job, deserved it more than me. (??)

What a sad developement to an opportunity to step up to “government employee” status. But, with illegal and corrupt activities, they jerked it and developed the “rapid communication, “get all the whites fired and call your cousin about an up and coming new job opening”…blacks are now the ‘power’ society”.

At the same time, the higher charactered blacks were following the guidance of the N.A.A.C.P., accepting educational grants, applying themselves and graduating with college degrees.

They were proving that blacks had just as much intelligence and capability as whites and were creating new respect and awareness of the facts.

They were moving into politics, investment purchases and country clubs, and where they were still not invited….they opened their own version of; ladies clubs, political commities and support centers, with themselves teaching and administering the programs and curriculum.

They provided, for themselves and their community, a wide new vista of community management discussion, planning and agenda. They initiated fund raising, opened childrens centers and support groups and learned how to start-up “non-profit” services and councils that recieved government funding.

These people took the community ball and ran farther than any white school class or functioning counsel had ever attempted to teach them, and they did it for the benefit of their community.

Meanwhile, when as they got into their new cars to return to their “new” community, they were called “Uncle Toms”, “traitors” and various other insulting inuendos, by those still living in the old neighborhoods.

They were accused of “going white” and forgetting where they came from. As if where you came from, means that you never had it in you, to better yourself, all the time. As if where you came from, means you can never amount to more than the “Gimme’s”, the old “neighborhoodies”, still hangin out and panhandlin’ on the corner, cause they are just “too cool and superior” to get a dam job OR 2, like the educated ones did.

The “Hoodies” tried to make them feel guilty and inclined to hand over some cash, just to show that they still admitted and respected that this was their “hood”, and they were willing to contribute to the “jis’ never got lucky” bros.

Those people earned and deserved every move up, that they made. They challenged the risk to security, they felt the painful tug, on their ear, from their grandmother, still yelling at them that they can be just as good as anyone else and to get out there and “sho’em”.

These “Gimme’s” were at the bottom level, of the black community and the future corrupt employees, who would begin taking their organized communication system into every possible business and neighborhood, they could infiltrate.

But, someone at least got them motivated to get off the corner.

Someone got them gathering together to discuss what they want or deserve out of life, someone got them to start looking “up” instead of “around” and deciding that they want more than this, someone got them to ask, “why don’t that good stuff ever happen to me?”, someone made them realize that it could and someone taught them that it never comes to the corner, looking for you….you have to go where it is and work for it.

These “someone”s” were usually directly or associatively connected to the “Uncle Toms”, who were giving back more than the “Gimme’s” realized.

The “Gimme’s” started moving “in” other neighborhoods, but their aim was not to assimilate and fit in, but to conduct surveilence and take over.

They still had not evolved beyond the initial luring principals of “meet them on their own level, to get their attention”. They had been told that they “could” do more with their lives, then too prematurely, in many cases, ran off and didn’t wait for the “how to” course.

They ran off half cocked, arrogant, rebellious, beligerant and bewieldered, full of militant, elitism and darn near civil warring determination.

They were a disaster, looking for a place to happen because they were determined to “GET OVER ON SOCIETY”, not to “JOIN IN AND BE A GENUINE MEMBER OF SOCIETY”.

I heard a young black man, discussing his new friendship, with a white student state, “yeah, it was fun, it was different, they do alot of really different things for fun”.

He may have initiated the friendship as a means of “using” this student, some of the corrupt, criminal activities, they are being “paid-on-the-side” to do, is identity theft, gathering slanderous photos and evidence against “future” graduated business leaders and politicians and luring these “upper class innocents” into activities that would “criminalize” and destroy their personal character records.

But it seemed that the friendship was possibly a “jus’ got lucky” situation that was opening his eyes to “sincerity, and appreciation” of the acceptance and non-prejudice way HE was being welcomed and treated, and he had never acknowledged it before. His friend was genuine…NOT trying to “Get Over on Him”, not trying to use HIM. I am sure his life path will be upward and quite successful, through this new revelation, of the difference between sincerity and using people, for criminal income.

But he is not in the majority of “hoodies make good” list.

Unfortunately, there is at least one corrupt “Gimme” employee in every single office and every single resturant, kitchen, medical institution, bank government office, factory, retail outlet and every other business not mentioned, including 3rd shift cleaning crews and security guards, who have keys to all locked areas and inventories.

And by now, they are not all black, but many are employed BY blacks, who instruct them on what trespass to focus on, for the benefit of “the group”, that they give more loyality and obediance to, than they give their paying employer.

Many do wonderful jobs, are usually very competent in their performance, report loads of gossip and rule-breaking tattles to their supervisors, as well as fabrications of how “someone else” does not do as good a job as “they” do and “they are the only ones who can be trusted”, by the supervisor.

Meanwhile, “they” are often times the ones standing around, having gossip sessions or socializing while everyone else does the work, including theirs.

They are the “Gimme” militant avengers who, with their prejudice mind, or their paid validation of the right to sabotage their employer, will receive a phone call, from a neighborhood manager and lie, steal, sabotage or vandalize anything they are ordered to do, on their employers premisis.

These “Gimme” groups were not a problem, until they merged with a white profiteering, criminal group, who hired them to assist in running businesses, that the group wanted to buy cheap, into bankruptcy, or out of business.

They accepted the side-jobs employment and as natural entrepreneurs, soon decided that they could run this scam themselves.

They started pulling a few businesses and properties, previously owned by whites, who’s lives they destroyed, and pulled them off to the side, for themselves to scam at full profit and sole benefit.

They now hired several different groups, including poor whites and some black out-siders, from their neighborhood, and even began recruiting some, to come in from other states, who later took the same confidence and broke off, forming their own corrupt business in competition with the locals.

They liked destroying the lives of the whites, and now they liked being the “masters” and employers of the whites. It fit perfectly into their prejudice mind-processing.

What they did not realize, was that other white employers, who had by now, hired the blacks “initial” white employers who were now being used, by this higher level of organized crime, as a cover-up cushion, already KNEW of the black skimming, against their new white employees.

The heirarchy decided to let it occur and then started hitting the skimmers with evidence and demands that they perform additional criminal acts, for the higher level directly, or face their initial employers, who would be enraged about news of the skimming.

And such is the situation, as it stands today. The blacks and the whites are BOTH being used, by occult (hidden) political forces of manipulation, that requires; “divide and conquer”, rebellion, willingness to break the law, uncompassionate disregard for the rights of others, total lack of respect or protection for the U.S. Constitution, the Judiciary System and the U.S. Government, and manipulated attitudes of anger and revenge toward groups of peer citizens.

There is no end to this commentary, because it has not ended. We are “DEEP” into it and the body counts are secret.

I am revealing, what I am positive is the truth of the matter, for everyone to be aware of the dangers and for Government to take action and not hide their heads in the sand. the deeper they hide their heads, the more they are helping the “ENEMIES OF AMERICA”.

NIKITA KRUSCHEV, COMMUNIST LEADER OF THE U.S.S.R., IN THE 1950′S, SCREAMED, “WE WILL BURY YOU, FROM THE “INSIDE”.

THAT 50 YEAR OLD AGENDA IS ABOUT TO REACH ITS CLIMAX.

There can be no ending until we once again enforce the constitutional rights laws, with protection for EVERY citizen, against discrimination and loses of freedom of choice and opportunity.

We MUST “CREATE” an honorable Judicial System, that will enforce laws properly and fully, protecting the innocent from judicial prejudice, fraudulent frame-ups and criminalization of t reputations or loss of property and possessions.

But, while still holding the burden of “innocent until proven guilty”, they MUST be more interrigative and consistent in discovering guilty parties who extort money, destroy reputations and rob citizens of identity, possessions and their sense of security, through “TERRORISTIC” stalking and slandering.

The Government CANNOT be the ones TERRORIZING them and MUST begin honoring all citizens rights to privacy and Due Process.

We must put an end to the “LAWLESSNESS AND DISCRIMINATION IN THE NO-MANS-LAND” called, the United States of America.

These crimes, both blue collar and white collar are the “CRUX” of our current economical decline. As jobs are lost, and businesses are lost, there is no income.

When there is no income, citizens lean on State and Federal funds to survive. When citizens are dependant on Government income, they are depleting Government treasuries and are not paying taxes to refill those treasuries.(PART 3 – THE END) – ALSO COMING UP AT THIS LOCATION:

(PART 1 )- “CHENEY EMBARRASSES BUSH WHITE HOUSE, WITH PROPOSAL FOR “PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD”

*******************************************************************

COMMENTYARY ON DANGERS OF INFILTRATION BEING ACCOMPLISHED IN AMERICA – RIGHT NOW !

**************************************************************

 

I am going to expand expression on some very important issues here, that are relevant to the swirling occult activity, that is occurring and injuring our American society.
These activities are, in my opinion, evidence that the American citizens are under the constant manipulation and controlling efforts, of Communist Aggressors, to very discreetly and permanently, erase the freedoms and the Constitution of Democracy in this country.
The key word is “DISCREET”. They prefer that you do not even realize that

 dangerous changes are being made, to our laws, to our economy and to our thought processes and philosophies, that motivate our unconsciencous and ignorant acceptance of their evil doings….because they always present them as “good benefits” that always have ulterior motives and serve no good at all except to further reduce freedoms and democratic rights.
These issues are a division tool against the people, with 3 specific examples examined being ;

smokers vs. non-smokers,
blacks vs. whites
and blacks vs. blacks.

This occult activity seeks to divide and conquer, while it presents itself as a non-threatening entity, and often as a positive, friendly, public information source on the good benefits of socialism.

They are only 1 group of several infiltrators who have been recruiting and manipulating, for decades, on all our college campuses. Now, those grads are in government jobs and corporate management positions.

Or worse, they stand available, to the side, ready to come in and takeover or reorganize our “needs” when asked to do so.They lure us to believe that Socialism is not really a baiting lure of the Communist Party and that what co-operation we give the Socialists, will not be helping any of the Communists to expand or openly seize control of the Socialist Party.

Even though the Communists have nurtured it, in every country, since its infancy and also lured the arrogance of people to believe that the Socialists nor the Communists will never try to seize control of the world.

We have manipulations of Communism occurring right here, right now. They are in the form of breaking down freedom and rights and our sense of safety and security. They are dividing to conquer. IE: Non-Smokers against smokers, blacks against whites and blacks against blacks.

We have credit bureaus now empowering discrimination by rejecting people for housing and employment, “on their say so”, with “bad credit reports”. Etc…….etc………etc.Meanwhile, much of our housing industry and national economic slump has been attributed to credit rejection on “willing to buy” consumers.

WHO GAVE THEM THIS STATUS OF GAGEING A PERSON’S TENANCY OR CREDIBILITY? WHO GAVE NON-BANKING INSTITUTIONS (such as potential landlords and employers) THE RIGHT TO SEE PERSONAL CREDIT HISTORIES?

These credit reporting agencies have already created loop-holes in our constitutional “NON-DISCRIMINATION IN JOBS AND HOUSING” LAWS.
Why would a landlord have the right to trespass into your credit history?
Are you able to take his building on your back and escape with it, leaving him a physical loss?

There are eviction laws and processes that protect him from ANY loss if a tenant enters financial crisis and cannot pay their rent on time.

HOUSING OR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION IS AGAINST THE LAW, UNDER ANY EXCUSE.

Potential employers have now also begun to take the “CRIMINAL TRESPASS ROUTE” by demanding an acceptable credit report, before hiring.

JOB DISCRIMINATION IS AGAINST THE LAW, UNDER ANY EXCUSE.

What right would they possibly have?

They are not even paying you in advance or fronting anything that could amount to a loss to them. What could they possibly offer as an excuse for this criminal trespass?
And worse, for the possibility of illegal job discrimination?

These lapses of Proper Judicial Protections, for the citizens, are a main source of economical decline in this country.
If citizens are left vulnerable to criminal trespass and illegal discrimination in jobs and housing, they are left without income, spendable cash or taxes due, that contribute to the ever revolving cycle of cash flow for the whole country.

Somewhere, in the “white-collar insanity revolution”, a decision was adopted that “blue collar Americans” were “the enemy” and were not to be given any benefits, rights, protections, or consideration, in the decision making process of national management and planning of both business and administrative arean as of National Policy Makers.

We have been licked into the ever expanding jowls of the encroaching Socialist/Communist beast, who trains its “owned peoples” that they will have NO FREEDOM, NO RIGHTS, NO PRIVATE BUSINESS, NO JUDICIAL PROTECTION, NO NOTHING THAT IS NOT SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE “PARTY” ! !

We are almost completely there. NOW.

Mr. Cheney, can you see the problems?

Can you see why it is not permissible to assume that a country does not exist, just because a radical Communist influence, that already seized a portion of that country, wants international acceptance that the remainder of it is now up for grabs?

Can you see the portions of the United States that have already been seized?
4Because, they have set up “twins”, functioning as government, that call themselves as “Senator” and “State Representative”, etc. and are ready to go into full function at a moments notice.Should we make you apply for Statehood?

Could you handle the economical and judicial responsibility, or should we just turn the treasury over to Israel so it does not get foolishly spent?
Do you recall when the U.S. guaranteed Arafat $600M, to develop and stabilize the Palestinian government? The U.S. handed the money over to Israel, Why?

There are many questions to be resolved, but whether the COUNTRY of Palestine should apply for Statehood is not one of them.
WHAT IF…America was invaded by an outside country of people and they blocked off our food supplies from entering our cities?

WHAT IF…They also blocked off our roads and obstructed us from getting to our work or recieving income…?

WHAT IF…They came storming into our homes and forced us to give them up or to live in only one bedroom, while they walked around carrying gunsall day?

WHAT IF.. you took it to court to complain that these people would not get out of your house and you were told that even the 400 year old deed, that has been passed down from generation to generation, is not good enough to prove that you are the owner?

WHAT IF…these kinds of loss of Judicial Protections were evidence that they had taken over our Judicial Systems as well and were also taking the white house and the state capital positions?

WHAT WOULD YOU DO? Would you have secret meetings with your neighbors? Would you gather together your hunting rifles? Would you try to form a make-shift army to protect your homes and your families?
Would you fight back and demand them to back down and remove themselves from your property “OR ELSE”?

Do you think that you would be labeled a “TERRORIST” ?

These are the very things that the Palestinians have been suffering with for 50 years, AND ALSO THE THINGS THAT THE IRAQIS’ NOW.

When the U.S. first went to Iraq, it was to free the citizens from a dictator, that was killing his own people.
These were the Shites and the Shites Kurds. The Americans were praised and appreciated by most of the Iraqi people.

But when they did not turn the government over to its own people,they became uneasy. Then, we know that outside “infiltraitors” began arriving and created confusion as to who was who and who was the enemy.

Soon, America was announcing that they are hunting and killing the “Kurdish Infiltraitors” and the “Shite Militia”. These were the people we went there to save !! Why were we now killing the Iraqis’ ??!!

Did they discover “imposters” of Iraqis’? I CLEARLY read accounts of Iraqi Shites being called the enemy.

Was it possibly because Sheik Muqtada Al-Sadr had gathered his neighbors and formed an army and were trying to defend their lives and their homes?

The Holy Quran forbids aggression or first hit wars. But, permits self-defence and even commands Muslims to stay in their homes and defend their homes, if they are invaded. Is this possibly what the Al-Sadr group has been doing?
Trying to get the Americans to give up the government of their country and get out?

WOULD WE BE DOING THE SAME THING ?
What about after they labeled us the “infiltraitors”?
Would we feel frightened that they are no longer trying to help our country, but that they are actually murdering the residents of that country?

How did all this confusion and role reversal begin?Iran was being blamed for supplying military weapons. Iran is a Muslim country.

Muslims are obligated to provide help and assistance to any Muslim country under attack or invasion. It is Commanded, by the Quran, and considered a MORAL DUTY.

Are they now looked at, by the U.S., as indirectly attacking the U.S., because they are giving the protection to the people that the U.S. has been killing?

Is that why we are now hearing so much retoric about “BAD IRAN”?
Iran is MUSLIM! They will NOT stand by and watch their kindred people being murdered, not even if they themselves had had wars with them, and I am relieved that they are giving the help that they provide!

Why are these babies being pushed through this HORROR ?!! These were people at peace, for the most part, except between them and their dictator leader.
And suddenly, America came and tore a hole in their country and economy and now they are all homeless and hunted and unemployed unless they accepted the rule of the American managed government.

They were NOT the people who attacked Kuwait either, they were the victims of those people. Remember, they are shites.
Saddam was sunni and his army was sunni sect religion and bathe party politicos. They were always against these shites and treated them deplorably.

Now America is backing the same sunni army that attacked Kuwait, and hunting the shites down, as “insurgents” ? ?

Has the ghost of Saddam Hussein possessed their brain? ?

Al-Sadr was a compliant co-operator in joining in and wanting to be a part of the new free government of Iraq.

The people were not resistent to U.S. guidance, but the U.S. would not leave and would not let them have fair say and authority over the Sunni Government Folks, who had been the army of the dictator!
They possibly would have accepted it more, if they had been given more representation and say in it.

As far as they could see, it was just about to become the same ol’, same ol’ that it had been before, with the Sunnis’ in charge and the Shites in victimization.

America needs to follow the example of IRAN and stop insisting that they act according to the same IMMORAL code and conduct that the U.S. has been acting.

All this may have seemed as though I veered far off the course of Palestine…..But that is far from the facts.

First, I wanted to show the similarities between what happened to the Palestinians and how they became labeled “TERRORISTS”.

Next, I wanted to show the simili of how these things have almost repeated themselves, in Iraq, only now the invaders are the Americans.

And I also wanted to inject a shake-up of the American thought process to clear the retoric and automatic brain reflexes, that we have been brain-washed with and bring it to a personal level and comprehension, of what these people are going through and why they are completely changing the character of their lifestyles and philosophies….because they have no choice!

They MUST Defend or Die!!
This is no longer something that we can tsk tsk about…what a shame…oh well, got to do the ironing…

People, WAKE UP !!!
It is our boys who are over there killing innocent people under orders and while they are over there and having their lives put into unnecessary increased danger from the unplanned and unapproved slautering of civilians. our boys do not want to be doing this and their relatives, at home do not want their lives put in jepardy, while on “peace keeping” assignment and their families do not want to become the “victims of revenge”, that this kind of insane, inhuman activity could result in.
LOOK AROUND…we are living a current civil war “right here” with loss of Judicial Rights, and corruption everywhere that we COULD be the next country to face invasion.

We need those boys to get OUT OF THERE TODAY !!

The signs are everywhere.

We already have Americans fighting Americans and nearly ALL of our Judicial and Government System has been eroded to blatent victimization and intentional criminalization of the American citizens and the courts approve and help our abusers and invaders!

read my personal evidences at:
http://www.stalkingcriminalsoninternet.blogspot.com/

“STALKING CRIMINALS ON INTERNET” IS A BLOG SITE WHERE I EXPOSE THE CORRUPTION THAT I AM BEING ABUSED WITH.
I am still waiting to see what got the Americans so confused that they started to attack the very people that they went there to save?!!
Please support a “UNITED STATES CITIZENS AGAINST DIVISION OR DESICRATION OF FREEDOM AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS”.
DAWN NARET’
P.O. BOX 2315
PITTSBURGH, PA, 15230-2315

PALESTINE/”PHILISTINE” – THE BIBLICAL COUNTRY”

•August 9, 2008 • Leave a Comment
THIS IS THE REAL DAWN NARET’
 
 
 

 

*******************************************

GOD BLESS THEM EVERYONE…
MAY THE PASSING OF THESE BLESSED CITIZENS MAKE US MORE DETERMINED TO REJECT THE ENEMIES OF DEMOCRACY.

*******************************************************

THIS ARTICLE IS A “RE-PUBLISHING” OF MY ORIGINAL
“CHENEY EMBARRASSES BUSH WHITE HOUSE WITH PROPOSAL FOR PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD”, BY DAWN NARET’

 

(SORRY, SOME PHOTOS STILL NEED TO BE INSERTED)

 

**************************************************************
CHENEY EMBARRASSES BUSH WHITE HOUSE,
WITH PROPOSAL FOR
PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD”

BY DAWN NARET’, MARCH 24, 2008

**********************************************

NATIONAL FLAG OF THE

COUNTRY OF “PALESTINE”
PRONOUNCED “PHILISTINE”
BY BIBLE AND BY NATIVES

**************************************************

DEFENDERS OF PALESTINE (photo)

*****************************************************
MAP OF THE “COUNTRY” OF PALESTINE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

***********************************

IRAQI HOMELAND DEFENDER AND SHITE CLERIC -
EX-VICTIM OF SADAM HUSSEIN

 

 

*********************************************
FLAG OF LEICHTENSTEIN

 

 

 

 

 

***************************************************

CREST OF LEICHTENSTEIN

VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY

 

 

 

 

 

 

POSSIBLY SAYING, “I WAS BETTER AT POLITICAL SCIENCE THAN AT HISTORY, GEOGRAPHY, RELIGION OR ISRAELI DECEPTIONS….BEWARE OH ‘SCRIBES OF ISRAEL

******************************************************
**********************************************
PALESTINE, IRAQ,
LEICHTENSTEIN AND
AMERICA…….
WHAT DO THEY ALL
HAVE IN COMMON ?

TOGETHER, THEY ARE
ALL ONLY A SMALL FRACTION
OF THE CURRENT TOTAL
GLOBAL AGGRESSION

AND THEY ARE ALL
VICTIMS OF OCCUPIED
TERRITORIES

FLAG OF LIECHTENSTEIN (photo)

 

 

 

 

****************************************************

CREST OF LIECHTENSTEIN (photo)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE TRUTH…
THE WHOLE TRUTH…
AND NOTHING BUT
THE TRUTH !

THE COUNTRY OF PALESTINE HAS EXISTED AND REMAINED ALWAYS, AND REMAINS TODAY, A SOVERIGN, INDEPENDANT NATION, SINCE BIBLICAL TIMES IT WAS “FORCED” TO CEDE A PORTION OF ITS LAND, TO THE COMMUNIST RUSSIANS IN 1948.

THIS WAS WHEN THE WORLD REFUSED TO PROTECT THE RESIDENTS OF PALESTINE AGAINST COMMUNIST AGGRESSION.

TODAY, THE COMMUNIST ISRAELIS’ (DIFFERENT PEOPLE FROM THE RELIGIOUS, SINCERE, JUDEAN ISRAELIS’) ARE DECEIVING THE WORLD ,THAT THEY ARE POSSESSORS OF ALL THE LAND AND WILL POSSIBLY CONSIDER CEDING A PORTION TO THE PALESTINIANS…..

WHAT ! ! WHO IS COMPLETELY BACKWARDS OF THE TRUTH ON WORLD HISTORY ? ! !
(THIS IS A VERY LONG 4 PART COMMENTARY, THAT I JUST HAD TO GET OFF MY CHEST, BEFORE I DIE……)
PART ONE – IS AN IMPORTANT CONCERN OF HOW WE, AS A NATION, ARE HANDLING FORIEGN AFFAIRS AND PARTICULARLY OUR ATTITUDES TOWARD MUSLIMS AND THE MIDDLE EAST.

PART TWO – IS PRIMARILY A SMOKERS RIGHTS VALIDATION OF HOW CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, OF SMOKERS ARE BEING BANNED. BUT, I HOPE ALL NON-SMOKERS WILL READ IT ANYWAY, BECAUSE I EXPLAIN A THEORY THAT THE NON-SMOKERS ARE BEING USED AS PAWNS, IN A GLOBAL ENCROACHMENT OF WORLD DOMINANCE AND DO NOT REALIZE HOW MUCH HELP THEY ARE GIVING THIS GROWING CANCER.

PART THREE – IS AN EXPANDED COMMENTARY ON THE “CURRENT CIVIL WAR”, THAT AMERICAN CITIZENS ARE BEING EXPOSED TO, VICTIMIZED BY AND ENSLAVED FOR, WHILE WANTING TO BELIEVE THAT IT IS ONLY COINCIDENCE.

PART FOUR – IS AN EVALUATION OF PROGRESSIVE ANTI-AMERICAN ECONOMICAL WARFARE, THAT HAS BEEN AIMED AT THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES, WITH THE INTENTIONAL, SPECIFIC GOAL OF SEIZING THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.

“Cheney Embarrasses Bush White House, On Statehood For Palestine” begins here:

In reading a Pittsburgh Tribune news article, “Palestinian state ‘longoverdue’ – Cheney”, of Mar. 24,2008, I could not have felt any more embarrassed, for our apparently biblically uneducated and spiritually unenlightened V.P., than I did at that moment.

Poor Mr. Cheney is not the first to commit the atrocity of geographical blundering, in discussion of Palestine and the history of the Middle East, and I ‘m sure he will not be the last.
The issue is, Palistine is already a COUNTRY!…..WHY would it require consideration as a State??

The COUNTRY of “Palestine”, is a western pronounciation of the original and current name of the COUNTRY, which is pronounced “PHILISTINE”, in the bible and in the modern language of the residents there.

PHILISTINE IS “PALESTINE”.

It is ALREADY a country….has always been a country, since BEFORE the time of Abraham,……continued to remain a country after a PORTION of it was occupied, fought over and finally recognized, by Global Peace Advisors, as the STATE OF ISRAEL.

(repeat – photo) MAP OF THE “COUNTRY” OF PALESTINE, (PRONOUNCED “PHILISTINE” BY THE BIBLE AND THE NATIVE RESIDENTS LANGUAGE OF ARABIC

(photo) PHILMAP11

 

 

 

(photo) lgmap11.JPG

Unfortunately, according to the current international rules, this procedure, of aggression and forced seceding, continues to be an accepted mode of global government transfer of power and recognition

So, America would have to be treated the same as thus and such. What would we do, if we were invaded by aggressive terrorists or Communist aggressors.

My father immigrated here, before World War 2, because the Communists took over his homeland. I would have had an entirely different life, a better life, if I had been born in his beautiful country, before the ugly aggressors spoiled it.

My father and his siblings left. Those who did not leave either fought and resisted silently against the government or became part of the communist party, by force.

(photo) VADUZ, LIECHTENSTEIN.

Those who maintained silent resistence, would probably be called “Terrorists” today, with the ease that the term is being misused against innocent defenders of homelands who are fighting against communist aggression.

Many of the so called “TERRORIST” groups, being so labeled by the U.S. and other Western Governments, are actually the original, authentic owners of lands and historical decendancy, that has been invaded and now robbed of all their possessions and their country, so they are desperately fighting back.

I state this info and share photos of my fathers country, because Communist Aggression arrived there and created great misery for the people.

Now, I am convinced it has arrived here…………..more realistically physical, than the 1950’s “We will bury you, from the inside…” – (slow infiltration plan) quote of Nikita Crusczchev, but in an aggressive, fully matured and fully assuming authority under every possible disguise and manipulation of legislation and economics of this country.

Would WE, AS AMERICANS, not do the same thing, if an aggressive group came here and announced that the U.S. Government “does not exist anymore” and the aggressors, therefore own the country and all the people now?

How VIOLENTLY might we fight back ?

AS VIOLENTLY AS NECESSARY TO GET THEM OUT OF OUR COUNTRY !

That is what the Palistinians have been doing for 60 years, with no compassion or help given by any other country.

That is what the Iraquis are doing now, only it is the U.S. that has “OCCUPIED” their land and holds the keys to their treasury.

(photo) MUQTADA ALSADR WAS A SHITE COUNTRYMAN VICTIMIZED BY SADDAM HUSSEIN,
FORCED TO ORGANIZE IRAQI DEFENDERS…..AGAINST THE “BATHE” PARTY OF SADDAM’S GOVERNMENT.

THEY WERE NOW RETURNING AS “THE AMERICAN MANAGED GOVERNMENT”…..ALREADY SHOOTING THE SHITES’ THAT THE AMERICANS SWORE TO GO THERE AND SAVE FROM SADDAM.

NOW CALLED “INSURGENTS/TERRORIST?” BY U.S.

WHO DROPPED THE “SAVE THE IRAQI SHITE PEOPLE BALL”………?

WHO ACCEPTED THE COMPLIANT ASSOCIATION OF MUTADA’S SHITE GROUP, INTO THE NEWLY FORMED GOVERNMENT, AS “CO-OPERATIVE COUNTRYMEN”,

AND AND THEN OUSTED THEM, WITH REFUSAL TO PERMIT THEIR OPINIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR PROTECTIONS FOR THE SHITE PEOPLE.

NOW YOU CALL THEM “INSURGENTS/TERRORISTS” BECAUSE THEY FIRE BACK AT IRAQUI SUNNI FORCES OR U.S., WHO ARE STILL KILLING THEIR VICTIMIZED PEOPLE ! !

THESE ARE HORRIBLE ATROSITES THAT OCCUR WHEN THE PEACE KEEPING BRIGGADES ARE MANIPULATED AND DECEIVED AS TO WHO THEY ARE HERE TO PROTECT.

The USA and many Christian groups, also became deluded into believing that all nations must back and support the State of Israel, because it is “written” so, in the Bible.

That’s it ! Bottom line ! God demanded it, or even the Christians will go to hell if they do not comply. (?)

WHO’S BIBLE says this? Our King James version of the Christian Bible contains all the promises given to the Israelites (NOT Israelis), who were given that name by God, because they were the decendants and followers, who were obediant to the teachings of the Laws “of the God” of ISRAEL (later named Abraham).

But, it also continues with additional facts and orders, from the same God, found in Isaiah, Judges and 1st Samuel.

These occurred AFTER the Egyptian exodus and AFTER the mercy of forgiveness, given to them for worshipping the golden calf And THAT, it is also “written”, in:

Judges Chapter 10 verses 6 through 14, (I wrote this out for the sake of those non-christians, who may not comprehend “JUD 10:6-14), as well as numerous pages of historical reading in the books of;
Judges, 1st Samuel and Isaiah, on the country of Palestine/Philistine and the aggressions against it and against the other middle eastern countries, by these people calling themselves after the Israelites, but not following the Laws of Abraham, in their actions…

 

 

(PHOTO)DOME.jpg

These writings, and all similar writings found in 1st Samuel, Judges and Isaiah, support the “OTHER” people in the Middle East, and must be looked at by these “peace seekers” and taken AS seriously, as they took the MIS-information about our “condemnation”, if we don’t support only Israel.

In JUD 10:6-14, we read:

(6) And the Children of Israel did evil AGAIN in the sight of the Lord, and served Baalim (Satin), and Ashtaroth………(and a long list of others)……..And forsook the Lord and served him NOT………..

(7) The anger of the Lord was Hot against Israel, and he sold them into the hands of the Philistines and into the hands of the children of Ammon (Jordan)……………….

(10) And the children of Israel cried out unto the Lord saying, “we have sinned against thee, both because we have forsaken our Lord and also served Baalim “. (Satan)………….

(11) And the Lord said unto the children of Israel, “Did I not deliver you from the Egyptians and from…..(long list of other mercies)……

(13) Yet ye have forsaken me and served other gods, wherefore I will deliver you NO more.

(14) Go and cry unto the gods which ye have chosen. Let them deliver you in the time of your tribulation.

Does THIS sound like God will condemn ANYONE who will not support Communist-backed Israel?

God himself is condemning those members who chose satanic gods and practices, over the God of Israel.

I think the good Jews of Israel have learned a great lesson, and have tried to remedy the weaknesses and errors of their ancient ancestors.

But, in my opinion, the Israeli GOVERNMENT needs to be guided and overseen with a clear understanding of their TRUE status and position, which is minimal and inferior to that of the government, of the COUNTRY of PALESTINE.

They need to accept and realize that they took a portion…..But NOT the COUNTRY.

They need to realize that the PORTION they took, is in great peril of being lost, with continued resistance to peace and co-operation with the leaders of the COUNTRY of Palestine, and nearly every other country, on the globe, that will no longer tolerate their blatant refusal to stop aggressive attempts to seize and destroy other settlements in the COUNTRY of Palestine.

History has proven that EVERY TIME the Israelis have agreed or signed a Peace Treaty, they have VIOLATED it within 1 to 2 days, with renewed attacks or oppressions against the neighboring populations.

These crimes against humanity can no longer be tolerated.

(photo long st.)

This is the “Honorable and Just” attitude, that all of the Middle East has been patiently waiting for the United States to stand on, in its evaluating and negotiating all proposals of Peace in the Middle East.

(photo – 4)

The United States, MUST STOP erroneously supporting the continued Communist-backed and supported, criminal and terroristic acts, of the government of Israel, against the natives of the COUNTRY of PALESTINE/PHILISTINE, and all other Middle Eastern countries….

READ ALL OF:

EXODUS,
Joshua 4:23
Numbers 27:23,
Joshua 3:1

Historically, the Hebrews repeated their offences of paganism and these later writings condemned the Israelites for rejecting the mercy and returning, once and twice, and as many as thirty times again, to the practices of paganism and rejection of the practices of the Law of Abraham

(which all good Jews follow) and for warring with the loyal natives of these countries who DID obey the commandments of God.

They even warred with the Hebrews of Judah, who are our modern day “Good Jews”, of the orthodox, conservative and reformed sects of Judean Jews, in every country.

Is this an attitude of bigotry, or anti-semantic?

Absolutely NOT! I happen to be very PRO-JEWISH for the Jews who conduct their lives in compliance to the Laws of Abraham.

(photo) MOM_AND_BABY.jpg

I ADORE and RESPECT JEWS!

I feel more compatible with most Jews than most Christians, for the main reason that the Jews don’t attempt to come off as ‘perfect piety in the flesh’.

They make jokes of “trying harder when you’re second” and such good humored non-self-inflation, that you can’t help but to love them. What’s not to love?

The problem comes in when the non-compliant-Law of Abraham members of Israel and all of their seized geographical areas, and the non-Jewish, uneducated political aggressors, from other countries, team up in evil doings and make the “REAL JEWS” look bad !!

Now I must condense, to have space to make my point.Mr. Cheney, before you erroneously spout out any more embarrassing rhetoric, about Palestine seeking the right to become a state………

(WHOEVER SUGGESTED THAT PROPOSAL ! !).

Palestine is the COUNTRY, already in existence and continuing to exist as a COUNTRY since Biblical times ! !

You should look in a “Strong’s Concordance”, for reference information on every sentence, in the bible, that contains the name “PHILISTINE”, which IS “Palestine” and which IS STILL AND ALWAYS WAS, the spelling and pronunciation of the name, of the COUNTRY of Palestine, in Arabic

(which is THE middle-eastern language of the people of all the middle-eastern countries).

We appear absolutely STUPID, every time a non-middle-easterner spews on about Palestine becoming a “STATE”.

Why should they request the right to become a state, when they are already a COUNTRY?

They never ceded their country when the Communists, financially and militarily, backed and sent, Russian Jews and Russian Christians AND RUSSIAN ATHIEISTS, to help the Palestinian Jews to seize a portion of the COUNTRY of Palestine from the natives of Palestine, those who were the residents in this Biblical COUNTRY for thousands of years.

I already quoted a Russian Christian, in my article :

“An American’s view of Islam”, available in the Library of Congress, copyright Oct. 1992), explaining why the Russians, who wanted the Russian Jews OUT of their land, had come to Palestine to take the Land for them and the Palestinian Jews (inspired to cecede from Palestine), and admitting that he was 1 of the original warriors who took it.

He was under the employ of Communist Russian personnel and financially backed by Communist Russia.

That backing was maintained, quietly and continues even today.

The Palestinian Jews did indeed “SECEDE” from the COUNTRY of Palestine and created the “State of Israel” (choosing the name themselves), in 1948. I revealed only the 1st name, of this witness, which was “Alex”, in my 1992 article.

Today, it is necessary that the world leaders recognize that the COUNTRY of Palestine was NEVER erased and will never cease to exist.

(photo – bridal dress)

(photo) – bridal-dress)-ramallah.jpg

But, also as a nation, we must separate the Russian people from the Previously -Russian Communist Government.

They (the Communists) no longer dominate the political decisions and do not control Mr. Putin or his people and are not the philosophy of the many good Russians who have migrated to this country, ever since heroes like Mr. Lek Walenska and Mr.Putin, achieved a democracy and a freedom to travel, that they never had under Communistic rule.

The good Jews are not our enemy, the good Muslims are not our enemy, the good Russians are not our enemy………so who is?

We find that answer in the Bible, Ephesians 6:12;

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places”. (In the end times, it is not nations or principalities that you will war against…but against the forces of evil holding authority in high places).”

You cannot name a country or a people as the enemy. That is the predicament governments have been facing, the last 3 decades of unexplainable twistings and turnings and increased turmoil worldwide.

These are the same evil forces that constantly lured the ancient hebrews back into pagan practices and ungodly acts.

So, it is the same force of evil that lures previously honorable politicians and governments to be blinded, of the truth and to err in judgment, committing “crimes against humanity and nations” and even against “their own people”.

Israel was a prophet of God and later, god bestowed the name of Abraham or Abram on him, and his followers then followed the law, of the God of Abraham. So the Israelites were the obediant followers of the phophet Israel, now Abraham, who taught them the laws of God (hence, the laws of the God , of Abraham,).

They were, at that time, still called Israelites (not Israelis, nor the modern-day Russians who invaded the country of Palestine). The Israelites were also a portion of the Hebrews, taken as slaves in Egypt and liberated by Moses, during the exodus with Moses.

Moses could have just rounded them up and left, but the Egyptian army would have just followed and attacked them.He tried to get the Pharoh to agree to their exit and promise to not follow them.

But after many weeks of proving that the God of Abraham was stronger than the pagan Gods of Egypt, the Pharoh was still not frightened of the God of Moses and refused to release the people.

Finaly, after some frightening displays of miracles, Pharoh feared that this God might be stronger than his pagan god and he released the Hebrew slaves to leave with Moses. It was during the Exodus, that Moses was divinely given the Ten Commandments.

Moses had gone up into the mountain, to pray and was spoken to, directly by God, and the Ten Commandments were etched onto stone tablets, at that time. He descended the mountain, excited to give this gift to the Hebrews and found them worshipping a golden calf, that they had built in his abscence.

Moses ROARED at them, insulted them for the pagan activity, then told them God would forgive them, if they destroyed the pagan idol and returned to him to obey the Ten Commandments.

They returned and then wandered 40 years, on foot, from Egypt north to Jordan, heading for their “promised land”, that God had said would be their settling place for all time.

(Here begins extention of part one – location of the “promise land”)

Joshua 1:3, King James Bible

“And Joshua rose early in the morning; and they removed from Shittim, and came to Jordan, he and all the children of Israel, and lodged there before they passed over.”

The book of “Exodus”, Which is also the “TORAH” gives the entire account, step by step, city by city, of the Israelites leaving Egypt, in the far southern tip of the middle east, and traveling north, to the “Promise Land”. Moses died along the way and his younger brother Aaron took over as leader.

There was a rebellious bunch (the ones who built the “golden calf” to worship), mixed in with the obediant believers (the true “Jews – obediant believers”). The rebelious ones were still practicing paganism, learned during their childhoods in Egypt, while the hebrews were held as slaves there, and did not turn from it.

They wanted only warring and looting of cities, everywhere they went. They were warned, by God to “not war with these people…this is not the land I have promised you”. They kept traveling north, along the west side of the Jordan River, with the river and the country of Jordan on their right, as they headed up north.

They were as far up as Syria, and were told to “NOT war with these people”. Syria is very far north of Gaza and Cannan and Jerusalem, and Syria was STILL not their promised land.

Then, at Shittim, around Iraq and Iran, which were BOTH one region of Persia, in those ancient days, they were told to cross OVER the River Jordan. This would take them RIGHT, toward the east to cross over Jordan.

Controversy has sprung up, that Gaza or Cannan or Jerusalem or Palestine/ancient Philistine was promised to them, but THIS IS AN UNTRUTH.

They were ordered to NOT war with Syria, while UP THAT FAR NORTH and they were told that “this is not the land that I promised you” and they were ordered OVER the River Jordan at Shittim. This placed them in ancient Persia, or Iraq and Iran.

(photo) MAP11

Abraham’ homeland was in persia and his wife, Sarah, is definetely buried in Param, Iraq.

Now why would God send them to Persia ?

This was the land of their tribe. This was the land of their inheritance. There does exist, a very large Jewish population, to this day, that are possibly true , authentic decendents of the original REAL “Israelites”.

But these folks in Palestine/Philistine are not the same people.So,
IF Americans truely BELIEVE that they MUST obey the bible….
Then SHOW MORE RESPECT AND CONSIDERATION TO; THE IRAQIS’, IRANIANS, PALESTINIANS, SYRIANS AND JORDANIANS ! !

Now, remember, these folks are ALL cousins with the Jews.

The first born child of Abraham, was Ismael born of Hagar,…and he is the accepted ancestor of the Muslims.

The second born son of Abraham, was Issac born of Sarah,….and he is the accepted ancestor of the Jews.

These folks SHOULD NOT BE WARRING ! !

Now, here is a MOST IMPORTANT BIT OF INFO………..The Muslims hold their ancestor Ismael as their link and evidence of original and authentic decendancy from Abraham.

So, By their blood line to Ismael and by their even more important obedience to the laws of God…….THEY ARE ALSO “ISRAELITES” OF A PURE GRAIN ANCESTRY.

Decendants and followers of the laws of the God of Abraham.

The Muslims ADORE abraham.

They hold him in very high regard. When the Kabaha’ was built as the Holy Shrine, in Mecca, The Holiest of men were given the decision of what would be placed in there. One of the most valued posessions, that they decided on was o small group of stones that are said to have come from a hand built prayer alter, built by Abraham, while he was traveling in the arab territories.


The Holy men argued over who should have the honor of placing them in the shrine and it was Islamically agreed that all 4 men should have the honor. They placed the stones in the middle of a blanket and the 4 each took an end of the blanket and together, in peace and islamically, they carried the stones to their place of honor and rememberance.

They remain there still today. These are the stones of the prayer alter of Abraham, their ancient ancester, through the blood line of Ismael.


This does NOT reduce the authentic claim of decendancy, from Abraham, of the Jews, and the entitlement of the Promised Land, because the Muslims know that they are not the ones taken as slaves to Egypt, or who were guided out of Egypt to cross the river Jordan.

They were staying in all their own various lands that they had migrated to, over thousands of years, and were living lives obediant to the laws of the God of Abraham, which were essentially the same as the “Islamic” laws of today.


That’s why Muslims believe that Abraham was the 1st Muslim. Because they believe that he was the first to truly devote himself to obedience of the laws.

By the time of Mohammad, the laws had been forgotten, erased, changed or ignored, during a rebellious wicked period of humans and had to be restated by the angel Gabriel, to Mohammad, who took had them written into the book ,”The Holy Quran”, and taught them to his people who rededicated themselves to the laws of the God of Abraham, giving the name of “Islam” to the religion, which means “PEACE”.


So we have the Jews AND the Muslims proven to be blood line “Israelites”. We have Abraham as a baby born in Iraq, where his ancestral home is and we have BOTH Muslim and Jewish decendants of his living in iraq and Iran.


These are all GOOD HOLY PEOPLE. The problem is, as it always was….”the builders of the golden calf” are still living among them, disguised as one of them, still possessed and controlled by evil, still impostering the faith, of both the Jews and the Muslims, depending on what they wish to accomplish…they can be either.


We have those people, combined with the cash and global dominance intentions of the communists, who are compatable to them in their atheistic beliefs and lifestyles and they serve as tools and co-operatives, around the globe to disrupt, create division among the people, cause distrust in the governments, inspire civil wars, bring down governments loot all the economy and enslave all the citizens.

That’s what they do, they’ve been doing it for eons and they are doing it today.


They are imposters of the faith, in every faith.

They are imposters of the people, in every level of government and daily industry. They are imposters of authority, slandering, terminating and destroying viable business foundations. And they are imposters of humans, doing evil destructions with no conscience or compassion toward those who’s lives they are destroying.


The United States is under attack by them, and does not reccognize it as an attack.

They work occultly, behind the scene, undercover,behind disguises and false identites.


They have recruited the blacks, the southern rich and poor, the north, east and west, the same, always blending in and pretending to be one of the regular people.

They lure the regulars into vulnarable situations, until they have something to blackmale them with or use it to control their co-operation. The blacks have been one of their strongest armies.
They were promised full freedom from prejudice and control of the land, if they joined in. Many blacks don’t even know that there are several levels, higher up than their regional leader, who are white and controlling “all yawls asses”.

They are cunning, appear professional, have all the right education and respectable backgrounds but, they are theives and murderers hoping to take over this country for their own personal profit.

They are all over the world, with these intentions and have sucked in several of the largest and formerly stable governments to co-operate with their “GLOBAL ASPIRATIONS”, which they always give the impression that the new recruit will come out a winner, but in the end…..they keep no witnesses, to the deception they pulled off. No one will win except them. Who ARE they??


They are every weak minded, spineless, lazy, selfish, arrogant, rebellious, militant pea-brain that allows themselves to be lured into evil, blackmailed, controlled and used as a tool to turn their government over to communist rule. It is the same in every country on the globe.

We cannot be babes in ignorance about what motivates some groups to do evil. We cannot allow ourselves to trust in superstition. And we cannot continue to support a government that is clearly committing “CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY”, and use the excuse that the bible tells us to support them. BUNK ! !

The bible also continues to tell you additional facts and orders,from the same God, found in Isaiah, Judges and 1st Samuel, whichoccurred AFTER the Egyptian exodus and AFTER the mercy of forgiveness,given to them for worshipping the golden calf.

What is the problem ? ? These Imposters ! !

That’s my strongest theory, based on many decades of watching their patterns and practices. There are simply imposters posing as both sides and instigating problems between them, because they want to get rid of ALL of them and take their lands and wealth.


In the State of Israel, we have a communist government, that moved in there and took the land from the Palestinians, in 1948, using the russian Jews as the excuse and their scapegoat and then as their “poster Boys” to collect sympathy and donations.


The “Token” Jews, sat up in front, on the government balconies, they were sincere and honest. Moshe Dayan, Golda Meir, Rabien… but were controlled by the communists, while accepting foriegn aid and donations from Americans and all the world during the HOT years of the Cold War with Russia.


They did all they could for their people and they were honorable leaders. They were as compliant as they could be to the communists, but NEVER gave up their priorities to their religion and to their people.


That same parental love and protection, is not available to modern day Israeli Jews. It is all about Money and Power, much the same as the citizens of the United States feel they are being neglected and placed in vulnerable situations, unfairly, by the activities of war and aggression by their parentally protective government.


READ ALL OF:


EXODUS,
Joshua 4:23
Numbers 27:23,
Joshua 3:1
I am going to expand expression on some very important issues here, that are relevant to the swirling occult activity, that is occurring and injuring our American society.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

These activities are, in my opinion, evidence that the American citizens are under the constant manipulation and controlling efforts, of Communist Aggressors, to very discreetly and permanently, erase the freedoms and the Constitution of Democracy in this country.

The key word is “DISCREET”. They prefer that you do not even realize that dangerous changes are being made, to our laws, to our economy and to our thought processes and philosophies, that motivate our unconsciencous and ignorant acceptance of their evil doings….because they always present them as “good benefits” that always have ulterior motives and serve no good at all except to further reduce freedoms and democratic rights.

These issues are a division tool against the people, with 3 specific examples examined being ;


smokers vs. non-smokers,

blacks vs. whites

and blacks vs. blacks.


This occult activity seeks to divide and conquer, while it presents itself as a non-threatening entity, and often as a positive, friendly, public information source on the good benefits of socialism.


They are only 1 group of several infiltrators who have been recruiting and manipulating, for decades, on all our college campuses. Now, those grads are in government jobs and corporate management positions.


Or worse, they stand available, to the side, ready to come in and takeover or reorganize our “needs” when asked to do so.They lure us to believe that Socialism is not really a baiting lure of the Communist Party and that what co-operation we give the Socialists, will not be helping any of the Communists to expand or openly seize control of the Socialist Party.


Even though the Communists have nurtured it, in every country, since its infancy and also lured the arrogance of people to believe that the Socialists nor the Communists will never try to seize control of the world.


We have manipulations of Communism occurring right here, right now. They are in the form of breaking down freedom and rights and our sense of safety and security. They are dividing to conquer. IE: Non-Smokers against smokers, blacks against whites and blacks against blacks.


We have credit bureaus now empowering discrimination by rejecting people for housing and employment, “on their say so”, with “bad credit reports”. Etc…….etc………etc.Meanwhile, much of our housing industry and national economic slump has been attributed to credit rejection on “willing to buy” consumers.


WHO GAVE THEM THIS STATUS OF GAGEING A PERSON’S TENANCY OR CREDIBILITY? WHO GAVE NON-BANKING INSTITUTIONS (such as potential landlords and employers) THE RIGHT TO SEE PERSONAL CREDIT HISTORIES?


These credit reporting agencies have already created loop-holes in our constitutional “NON-DISCRIMINATION IN JOBS AND HOUSING” LAWS.
Why would a landlord have the right to trespass into your credit history?

Are you able to take his building on your back and escape with it, leaving him a physical loss?


There are eviction laws and processes that protect him from ANY loss if a tenant enters financial crisis and cannot pay their rent on time.


HOUSING OR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION IS AGAINST THE LAW, UNDER ANY EXCUSE.


Potential employers have now also begun to take the “CRIMINAL TRESPASS ROUTE” by demanding an acceptable credit report, before hiring.


JOB DISCRIMINATION IS AGAINST THE LAW, UNDER ANY EXCUSE.


What right would they possibly have?


They are not even paying you in advance or fronting anything that could amount to a loss to them. What could they possibly offer as an excuse for this criminal trespass?

And worse, for the possibility of illegal job discrimination?


These lapses of Proper Judicial Protections, for the citizens, are a main source of economical decline in this country.

If citizens are left vulnerable to criminal trespass and illegal discrimination in jobs and housing, they are left without income, spendable cash or taxes due, that contribute to the ever revolving cycle of cash flow for the whole country.


Somewhere, in the “white-collar insanity revolution”, a decision was adopted that “blue collar Americans” were “the enemy” and were not to be given any benefits, rights, protections, or consideration, in the decision making process of national management and planning of both business and administrative arean as of National Policy Makers.


We have been licked into the ever expanding jowls of the encroaching Socialist/Communist beast, who trains its “owned peoples” that they will have NO FREEDOM, NO RIGHTS, NO PRIVATE BUSINESS, NO JUDICIAL PROTECTION, NO NOTHING THAT IS NOT SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE “PARTY” ! !


We are almost completely there. NOW.


Mr. Cheney, can you see the problems?


Can you see why it is not permissible to assume that a country does not exist, just because a radical Communist influence, that already seized a portion of that country, wants international acceptance that the remainder of it is now up for grabs?


Can you see the portions of the United States that have already been seized?
4Because, they have set up “twins”, functioning as government, that call themselves as “Senator” and “State Representative”, etc. and are ready to go into full function at a moments notice.Should we make you apply for Statehood?


Could you handle the economical and judicial responsibility, or should we just turn the treasury over to Israel so it does not get foolishly spent?
Do you recall when the U.S. guaranteed Arafat $600M, to develop and stabilize the Palestinian government? The U.S. handed the money over to Israel, Why?


There are many questions to be resolved, but whether the COUNTRY of Palestine should apply for Statehood is not one of them.

WHAT IF…America was invaded by an outside country of people and they blocked off our food supplies from entering our cities?


WHAT IF…They also blocked off our roads and obstructed us from getting to our work or recieving income…?


WHAT IF…They came storming into our homes and forced us to give them up or to live in only one bedroom, while they walked around carrying gunsall day?


WHAT IF.. you took it to court to complain that these people would not get out of your house and you were told that even the 400 year old deed, that has been passed down from generation to generation, is not good enough to prove that you are the owner?


WHAT IF…these kinds of loss of Judicial Protections were evidence that they had taken over our Judicial Systems as well and were also taking the white house and the state capital positions?


WHAT WOULD YOU DO? Would you have secret meetings with your neighbors? Would you gather together your hunting rifles? Would you try to form a make-shift army to protect your homes and your families?
Would you fight back and demand them to back down and remove themselves from your property “OR ELSE”?


Do you think that you would be labeled a “TERRORIST” ?


These are the very things that the Palestinians have been suffering with for 50 years, AND ALSO THE THINGS THAT THE IRAQIS’ NOW.


When the U.S. first went to Iraq, it was to free the citizens from a dictator, that was killing his own people.

These were the Shites and the Shites Kurds. The Americans were praised and appreciated by most of the Iraqi people.


But when they did not turn the government over to its own people,they became uneasy. Then, we know that outside “infiltraitors” began arriving and created confusion as to who was who and who was the enemy.


Soon, America was announcing that they are hunting and killing the “Kurdish Infiltraitors” and the “Shite Militia”. These were the people we went there to save !! Why were we now killing the Iraqis’ ??!!


Did they discover “imposters” of Iraqis’? I CLEARLY read accounts of Iraqi Shites being called the enemy.


Was it possibly because Sheik Muqtada Al-Sadr had gathered his neighbors and formed an army and were trying to defend their lives and their homes?


The Holy Quran forbids aggression or first hit wars. But, permits self-defence and even commands Muslims to stay in their homes and defend their homes, if they are invaded. Is this possibly what the Al-Sadr group has been doing?

Trying to get the Americans to give up the government of their country and get out?


WOULD WE BE DOING THE SAME THING ?

What about after they labeled us the “infiltraitors”?

Would we feel frightened that they are no longer trying to help our country, but that they are actually murdering the residents of that country?


How did all this confusion and role reversal begin?Iran was being blamed for supplying military weapons. Iran is a Muslim country.


Muslims are obligated to provide help and assistance to any Muslim country under attack or invasion. It is Commanded, by the Quran, and considered a MORAL DUTY.


Are they now looked at, by the U.S., as indirectly attacking the U.S., because they are giving the protection to the people that the U.S. has been killing?


Is that why we are now hearing so much retoric about “BAD IRAN”?

Iran is MUSLIM! They will NOT stand by and watch their kindred people being murdered, not even if they themselves had had wars with them, and I am relieved that they are giving the help that they provide!


Why are these babies being pushed through this HORROR ?!! These were people at peace, for the most part, except between them and their dictator leader.

And suddenly, America came and tore a hole in their country and economy and now they are all homeless and hunted and unemployed unless they accepted the rule of the American managed government.


They were NOT the people who attacked Kuwait either, they were the victims of those people. Remember, they are shites.

Saddam was sunni and his army was sunni sect religion and bathe party politicos. They were always against these shites and treated them deplorably.


Now America is backing the same sunni army that attacked Kuwait, and hunting the shites down, as “insurgents” ? ?


Has the ghost of Saddam Hussein possessed their brain? ?


Al-Sadr was a compliant co-operator in joining in and wanting to be a part of the new free government of Iraq.


The people were not resistent to U.S. guidance, but the U.S. would not leave and would not let them have fair say and authority over the Sunni Government Folks, who had been the army of the dictator!

They possibly would have accepted it more, if they had been given more representation and say in it.


As far as they could see, it was just about to become the same ol’, same ol’ that it had been before, with the Sunnis’ in charge and the Shites in victimization.


America needs to follow the example of IRAN and stop insisting that they act according to the same IMMORAL code and conduct that the U.S. has been acting.


All this may have seemed as though I veered far off the course of Palestine…..But that is far from the facts.


First, I wanted to show the similarities between what happened to the Palestinians and how they became labeled “TERRORISTS”.


Next, I wanted to show the simili of how these things have almost repeated themselves, in Iraq, only now the invaders are the Americans.


And I also wanted to inject a shake-up of the American thought process to clear the retoric and automatic brain reflexes, that we have been brain-washed with and bring it to a personal level and comprehension, of what these people are going through and why they are completely changing the character of their lifestyles and philosophies….because they have no choice!


They MUST Defend or Die!!

This is no longer something that we can tsk tsk about…what a shame…oh well, got to do the ironing…


People, WAKE UP !!!

It is our boys who are over there killing innocent people under orders and while they are over there and having their lives put into unnecessary increased danger from the unplanned and unapproved slautering of civilians. our boys do not want to be doing this and their relatives, at home do not want their lives put in jepardy, while on “peace keeping” assignment and their families do not want to become the “victims of revenge”, that this kind of insane, inhuman activity could result in.

LOOK AROUND…we are living a current civil war “right here” with loss of Judicial Rights, and corruption everywhere that we COULD be the next country to face invasion.


We need those boys to get OUT OF THERE TODAY !!


The signs are everywhere.


We already have Americans fighting Americans and nearly ALL of our Judicial and Government System has been eroded to blatent victimization and intentional criminalization of the American citizens and the courts approve and help our abusers and invaders!


read my personal evidences at:


“STALKING CRIMINALS ON INTERNET” IS A BLOG SITE WHERE I EXPOSE THE CORRUPTION THAT I AM BEING ABUSED WITH.
I am still waiting to see what got the Americans so confused that they started to attack the very people that they went there to save?!!

Please support a “UNITED STATES CITIZENS AGAINST DIVISION OR DESICRATION OF FREEDOM AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS”.

DAWN NARET’

P.O. BOX 2315

PITTSBURGH, PA, 15230-2315

*****************************************************************

“How corrupt employees, at the pa state dept. of transpertation stold my pa driver’s license and possibly sold my identity.”

CLICK ON LINK: www.stalkingcriminalsoninternet.blogspot.com

to view ALL letters and documents, including the official court order, that they defied.

**THEN COME BACK HERE, BECAUSE THIS ARTICLE CONCERNS MORE THAN JUST MY PERSONAL ISSUE.

YOU ARE AT: http://www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com

“HEY BUDDY, CAN YOU SPARE A LATTE?”

CLICK: doc3.doc   here, to view ONLY pdf physical copy of ”COURT ORDER”, forbidding PA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION to cancel my license until a judge has determined that they have a valid excuse….WHICH THEY DO NOT !!!

YOU CAN SEE THE PHOTO COPIES OF “ALL” THE LETTERS AND DOCUMENTED CORRESPONDENCE ON MY OTHER BLOG SITE: “STALKING CRIMINALS ON INTERNET” AT: http://www.stalkingcriminalsoninternet.blogspot.com

TO VIEW ALL LETTERS AND DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THIS VICTIMIZATION AND ATTEMPTED CRIMINALIZATION OF AN INNOCENT U.S. CITIZEN.  THEY WILL BE UPDATED AS THE COURT BATTLE PROGRESSES.

IS IT A COINCIDENCE THAT AT A TIME WHEN 911 IS BRINGING ABOUT ACTIVITY OF INCREASED “BORDER PATROL” TYPE IDENTITY INSPECTIONS, AND WE CANNOT TRAVEL ON PUBLIC TRANSPROTATION, WITHOUT PHOTO I.D., THAT PA DEPT. OF TRANS. IS YANKING AS MANY PA DRIVERS LICENSES, AS THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH, EVEN IF THEY HAVE TO GO BACK 20 YEARS, AND THERE WAS STILL NOTHING THEY COULD USE AS A VALID EXCUSE.

WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO ALL THESE CITIZENS WHO ARE NOW FORCED TO EXIST WITHOUT LEGAL I.D.?

IN MY OPINION, THIS IS AN ATTEMPTED CRIMINALIZATION PREPARATION PROCESS. YOU MAY BE ABLE TO PROVE YOUR IDENTITY, IN OTHER WAYS, BUT IN THE MEANWHILE, YOU COULD BE HELD TO ACCOUNT AND UNJUST CHARGES OR ASSUMED GUILT, IN A MATTER UNTIL YOU DO CONVINCE THEM.

I READ, IN THE NEWS, THAT MEXICO IS COMPLAINING OF AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT PROBLEM, MOSTLY ON ITS SOUTHERN BORDER. BUT IN THE NEXT PARAGRAPH, ALMOST OVERLOOKED, WAS A QUOTE, FROM A “U.S. BORDER PATROL” PERSON STATING THAT THE U.S. HAS BEEN TRYING TO MAINTAIN CONTAINMENT, ON ITS SIDE,  AND IT IS AWARE THAT MEXICO HAS BEEN ARRESTING PEOPLE WHO DO NOT HAVE LEGAL IDENTITY ON THEM ! !

THAT WAS THE U.S PERSON, SPEAKING OF TRYING TO MAINTAIN CONTAINMENT ! ! THEY ARE TRYING TO KEEP US IN-N-N-N THE U.S?

IF YOU WANT TO VISIT MEXICO SAFELY, YOU JUST NEED TO SHOW YOUR U.S. I.D. NO PROBLEM WHEN ARRIVING OR LEAVING. BUT, APPARENTLY, THESE PEOPLE COULD NOT ENTER LEGALLY, OR HAD THEIR I.D. STOLEN WHILE VISITING. WERE SOME TRUELY TRYING TO ESCAPE U.S. VICTIMIZATION AND DANGERS? 

WHY ARE WE BEING VICTIMIZED SO? WHAT IS THE MOTIVE FOR CREATING A SITUATION THAT COULD LEAVE CITIZEN’S SO VULNERABLE TO MANY BAD EXPERIENCES? ARE THEY HELPING THE IDENTITY THIEVES? ARE THEY THEMSELVES, THE IDENTITY THIEVES OR THE ILLEGAL PURVEYOR OF STOLEN IDENTITIES? THIS IS AN EXTREMELY SERIOUS MATTER ! !

BECAUSE I AM A LOYAL AMERICAN…I CHOSE TO BELIEVE THAT THESE ACTIVITIES ARE BEING CONDUCTED BY CORRUPT EMPLOYEES OR IMPERSONATORS OF GOV. EMPLOYEES AND NOT THE TRUE POLICIES OF OUR STATE GOVERNMENT. BUT THAT COMFORTING BELIEF WILL NOT SPPED A RESOLVING PROCESS, SHOULD I ENCOUNTER 1 OF A POSSIBLE MILLION BAD EXPERIENCES THAT COULD RESULT FROM NOT HAVING A LEGAL PHOTO I.D.

BUT BELIEVE IT OR NOT, THESE CRIMINALS, WHO EVER THEY ARE, HAVE CHOSEN TO DEFY A COURT ORDER AND JUST SENT ME A 2ND AND A 3RD LETTER OF THREAT TO CANCEL MY DRIVERS LICENSE. They just changed the cancel dates and are trying to steam roll right along. I am trying to get copies of all these letters on here. It will be done!

(I DID MANAGE TO GET A COPY OF THE COURT ORDER OVER HERE, CLICK BELOW ON FILE ”dc_2501623″. IT NEEDS TO BE ROTATED TWO SPINS TO BE UPRIGHTED. SORRY, I TRIED TO SAVE IT UPRIGHT, BUT PDF FILES CANNOT BE ALTERED.)  

                                               dc_2501623

 The citizens of PA are being harrassed, terrorized and in many cases, forced to leave state, due to these abuses. 20 years ago, I had a temporary residense in ALABAMA.

 I legally turned in my PA license, when I arrived and recieved it as renewed, when I returned to PA. When I left ALA and returned to PITTSBURGH, PA, I was not under any suspension or cancelation when I left. I could have kept my ALA license, but I did not want it, any longer, I was going back to Pittsburgh, PA.

For 20 years, I have had my PA license back, renewed 3-4 times, with no violations. Now they want to refuse to renew it for some trumped up excuse that, according to their new national computer system, I have a problem in ALA that needs to be resolved.

I contacted ALA and got my written record from them. “License cancelled when I left state, no violations, no problems”.

I gave this to PA and they issued me my license. Scroll down at the end of this notice to see the new license, with current “fatter me” picture. 1 week later, they sent me a letter that they want that license back, but I can appeal if I want to.

Just more harrassment. I already gave them the 3 year abstract, from ALA, which is all that is required with this national computer license check system, WHY IS PA GOING BACK 20 YEARS TO TRY TO FIND AN EXCUSE TO HARRASS ME AND CANCEL MY LICENSE?. That is abusive and illegal intrusion. They only have a right to review the 3 year period that the other states review.

The verification from ALA was not accepted. so I got a COURT ORDER to stop them from their criminal activity, until I can get some legal, honorable members of our justice and political system to take a look at these horrible abuses.

In spite of a court order, they blew it off and RESENT the letter with a different cancel date to stagger appeals hearings, thinking they can imprison me in this state with repeated abuses.

I have had the same license number for 45 years. If I should lose that number, an identity thief could have it issued to them and be accepted as the authentic dawn naret!

They did this to me with my P.O. Box 505, Pgh., Pa 15230 address that I had about 15-20 years. now, I requested to have my old number box back, that I closed when I moved to ALA, and guess what? I am told that I cannot have it back unless I pay 3 years rent on it !! What the heck is THAT ?? That is corrupt employees !! I did not owe any rent on the box. The system is that you pay by the 10th of the month that your paid time expires in and if no renewal payment is received, they lock you out. You never get a chance to get 3 years behind !

They have kept me from having my original P.O. Box number and now they are trying to keep me from having my original drivers license number. If I let them get away with cancelling my PA license, I cannot travel outside the city of Pittsburgh on public transit of plane, train or bus!! You have to present a valid current photo I.D., before they will issue you a ticket now.

I suppose that is has a lot to do with homeland security, and I don’t mind………..as long as I am still free to travel at will !!

I asked the PA Dept of Trans. “What will I do,  if they should succeed in taking my license, even temporarily, until I can get the legal truth straightened out ? Will I have to use a State Photo I.D. ?

Guess what his answer was …..”WE don’t issue State Photo I.D.’s to people who have had their drivers license canceled.”  (I’m screaming a seamans’ cuss vocabulary to shame by now, inside my head !….) You cannot get a State I.D. if your license has been canceled…..Isn’t that what the State I.D. was created for, was to provide verified photo i.d. to those who DO NOT DRIVE  ?? !! How can they get away with these imprisoning abuses ?!

 Now, since I am a disabled person, living on social security disability, that, I believe in my soul, is already being embezzeled of two thirds or more of the cash benefit amount, now I stand with a more serious chance of NOT being able to protect myself, by stopping the identity thieves from having my address changed to theirs or moving out of state, with MY social security income, and leaving me totally penniless of income….AGAIN !! And I can’t go, because I’m not allowed on any public transportation without I.D. !!! It’s almost as if the State is helping to make things easier for identity thieves

DO YOU SEE A CONSPIRICY HERE ???? And I have witnessed that every time someone mentions “conspiricy”, they are dragged off to a psych consult and soon institutionalized and declared “incompetent”, so their income is no longer turned over to them and they do not manage their own affairs any longer, but an court assigned person, whom they might or might not have ever known, takes over the receiving of their social security check and they are given “allowances” from this person, which are supposed to amount to 100% of the social security check. But some judges and Depts. of social services have determined that a % of the check may be kept as a service fee for managing the victims money.

I have witnessed instances where a person receiving $1000 a month benefit check, was only getting $30 of the money handed over to them by their assigned person. ABUSSES !!

I also scream abuse because I  suspect that my identity has been sold by corrupt criminal employees of PA STATE GOV.  or criminals trespassing into their computer systems and using their form letters, signed by their legal employees.  I am also suspecting that it was sold by corrupt staff of a woman’s shelter that I was forced to stay in, while waiting for disability and section 8 housing, that I am still being refused on and discriminated against, after 3 applications I was never given any housing although, while sitting there the 2nd or 3rd time filling out yet another application and being told that there is a 2 year waiting list, I witnessed the young black female clerk make a phone call to a cousin and tell her that the money is coming in on Tuesday, and to be here at 8am and she will get the cousin all signed up…..ABUSE !

And now, guess what, someone, using my name and gave the section 8 office in west moreland county, an application with an address that I; never put on applications and which was never put on my drivers license and luckily, I recieved a letter about the application in the mail, and will follow-up on to investigate.

It was approved for section 8 in West Moreland County, 2 months ago, but I never got the letter in my P.O. Box in time to accept, even if I wanted to. Did they back date it? Was it held out of my mail box? Why did it take 2 months to get to me? 

It is toooo strange also, that I have, in the last 1 month been thinking that I need to get out of Pgh. City and get to better air, for my health. West Morland County has been 1 of the 2 areas I had thought to look into. But, It’s too late, there is already someone there using my name and I will have to fight off the duplication and slander, because these people are criminals….they do not lead clean, wholesome lifestyles the way I do. 

I am currently fighting to stop them from canceling my drivers license, which has been in good standing for 20 years!

I will publish these letters as soon as possible with the whole story, although, publishing is getting harder and harder, because I am a poor person on social security disability, I cannot afford my own computer and have to go to the Carnegie Library, Pittsburgh, PA to do all my computer work. AND YES, I HAVE A LOT OF COMPLAINTS… THESE ARE ALL VALID MISERIES THAT I HAVE TO PUT UP WITH EVERY DAY AND I AM GETTING VERY SICK AND TIRED OF IT ALL.

This Library was at one time a very reputable institution that was donated to the citizens by Andrew Carnegie, a 19th century industrialist who was philanthropic in many areas of life and endowment projects in Pittsburgh. But times have changed, The trust fund that Andrew Carnegie set up to manage these free public Libraries and a super large Museum of Art, Natural History, and just about everything under the sun, has been seized by people, who, in my opinion are not of the caliber to be entrusted with an endowment trust as large as the Carnegie Institution.

One of the board members has recently been imprisoned for fraud and embezzelment from city government accounts where she worked as an employee. the caliber of the people are extremely questionable. I hold  the opinion that 70% of the treasures in the museum are missing and have been replaced by recent cheap displays of no value.

and beyond the museum, the computer dept. has been sabotaging work and in my opinion obstructing the poor people from accomplishing any basic needs work, like job hunting and house hunting. We have such a problem with trespassing and obstruction that you files disappear completely, get converted to encoding without your permission, get removed from your floppy disk completely e-mail is erased and diverted  temporary files that are supposed to disappear are still popping up by accident 3-4 months later while you are fighting with the machine to give you back your work that it just stiled off the screen and up pops a file that was stolen 3-4 months ago.

The illegal system has already been under investigation and I hope that they take it all the way to removing the current system completely, because we cannot even respond to e-mail resume’ submission on corporate accounts.

I wasted years of effort job hunting in the public library, only to find out now and to obtain evidence that these horrendous acts of discrimination and obstruction have been intentional practices of the staff of a very criminal system. I never give up effort and I will get all the letters online one way or another. It was a fighting miracle that I got the copy of the court order on here, even if you do have to click to view it, at least it is visible.

dawn naret’

******************************************************************

DOCUMENTED LEGAL BATTLE WITH THE PA STATE DEPT. OF UNEMPLOYMENT. I SERVED AS MY OWN ATTORNEY, AND WROTE EVERY WORD OF LEGAL COMMUNICATION MYSELF. – DAWN NARET

 

EXIBIT #1

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

NARET v. UCBR NO. 1742 CD 2004 (2004) BY DAWN NARET’, ATTORNEY FOR THE APPELLANT

PROCEDURAL HISTORY:This is an appeal of the final determination of the Unemployment compensation Board Of Review, (hereafter referred to as UCBR), which ruled, on July 17, 2004, that claimant was not entitled to Unemployment Compensation Benefits, (hereafter referred to as UC Benefits).

On February 7, 2004, the Unemployment Compensation Department ruled that the claimant was eligible for unemployment compensation benefits under section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law

On March 12, 2004, a service-contract company from missouri named TALX filed an appeal to that determination claiming itself non-legal agent of the employer. A hearing was held April 21, 2004 before referee, Marilyn Gunden. A local employee of the employee was present to represent the employer.

The claimant was late to arrive and was denied during two (2) phone requests to allow her a few more minutes to attend the hearing or to deliver a written testimony to be evaluated before a final decision.

The referee held a 15 minute hearing with the employers representative while the claimant was on the phone but was denied the opportunity to testify. The referee decided on May 17, 2004 in favor of the employer and ruled that the claimant was not eligible for unemployment compensation benefits under section 402(e).

On June 1, 2004 Claimant appealed the decision of the referee with the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (hereafter referred to as UCBR) and forwarded written testimony to the UCBR as instructed by the referee’s office.

On July 21, 2004 the UCBR ruled in favor of the referee and denied the claimant’s request to have the decision remanded. The presiding board members were: William A Hawkins, Chairman Eileen B. Melvin, MemberRichard W. Bloomingdale, and MemberClaimant sent the UCBR a request for reconsideration and was denied a reconsideration.Claimant is now appealing to the honorable judges of the Commonwealth Court of Pa. A brief was hand-delivered by claimant on October 8, 2004 and was rejected by an unnamed person.

FACTUAL HISTORY:

On February 21, 2004 The Unemployment Compensation Department “Notice of Determination”, listed a fact finding survey of the employer.the employer denied willful misconduct

WEB SITES:in the findings of fact:1. The claimant was last employed on February 5, 2004
2. The claimant’s job title was LPN Charge Nurse.
3. The claimant was discharged as a result of “unsatisfactory work performance”.
4. The claimant had been warned about the unsatisfactory work performance.
5. The claimant worked to the best of her ability.Based on the employers testimony in the fact finding survey, the Unemployment Compensation Department rendered a decision of eligible for UC Benefits pursuant to section 402 (e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.On March 12, 2004 A service-contract company named TALX, from missouri, filed an appeal to eligibility, claiming itself representative and non-legal agent of the employer. Their appeal was charging willful misconduct that was already denied by the local employer. an appeal hearing should not have been grantedOn April 21, 2004 A hearing was held at 10:30AM before referee, Marilyn Gunden. The representative for the employer, Ms. Donna Bowman, Director of nursing, arrived and was invited to inspect the file. She looked at the already existing file containing documents #1 through #31.

The referee stated that she would now enter items #1 through #31, (that were not presented by Ms. Bowman), into the record if THERE was no objection, and Ms. Bowman was sworn in for testimony. The claimant was late for the hearing. She phoned in to request a short recess of a few minutes untill she could arrive. The request was denied. She was told that the hearing had already started and she was too late to attend.

She phoned back a second time to request permission to drop off a written testimony, including evidence to be evaluated before a final decision by the referee. The request was denied. She was told that she would have an opportunity to present testimony to the UCBR, in an appeal process available to her if the referee decided in favor of the employer.

The hearing lasted 15 minutes and the claimant was on the phone twice, during that time, trying to attend or at least drop off written testimony.

On May 17, 2004 the referee made a determination in favor of the employer and reversed the original determination of eligible to not eligible.

On June 1, 2004 claimant filed an appeal to the UCBR, and mailed to them a 15 page initial cover letter plus 50 pages of example correspondence she had had with her superiors, aiding them in having full knowledge of problem areas and reporting her efforts to inspire state and corporate compliance and efficient functioning in the facility.
She requested a timely review, by the UCBR, because UC Benefits were immediately cut off upon the referee’s decision of not eligible.

On July 6, 2004 A letter of inquiry was sent to Mr. Bill Truskey, Legislative Liaison for UCBR from the honorable Mike Sturla, PA State Representative to attempt to aid the claimant, his constituent, in ending the financial duress being suffered while awaiting remanding by the UCBR upon examination of all the testimony and evidence presented.

On July 21, 2004, three (3) months after the referee’s hearing, the UCBR supported the referee’s decision and denied eligibility of UC Benefits based on; “the entire record of the prior proceedings, including the testimony submitted at the referee’s hearing”.

There was no due process available to the claimant. Her testimony and evidence were not even evaluated in the appeal. There was no appeal process.

Her testimony was rejected from being accepted into the record. The discarding of the testimony of the claimant was stated to have been done because; “The claimant has not established good cause for her actions. The claimant’s request that the record be remanded for additional testimony (the claimant’s ONLY testimony) is denied as she has not advanced proper cause for her failure to appear at the original referee’s hearing.”.

Page one (1) and page two (2) of the 15 page initial letter filing appeal to the UCBR gave a clear explanation that the claimant was indeed attempting to attend but was forbidden to attend and also forbidden to deliver written testimony.

On July 28, 2004 claimant submitted a request for forms to enter an appeal with the Commonwealth Court of PA., in the event that a reconsideration would also be denied by the UCBR.

On July 29,2004, following a telephone request, a written request for all transcripts and records of the hearing was e-mailed to the UCBR.

On July 29, 2004 a five (5) page brief request for reconsideration, citing the list of items being appealed, was faxed to the UCBR.

On July 29, 2004 Claimant also post-marked and mailed a 34 page hard-copy letter to the UCBR, making a formal request for reconsideration and listing specific arguments to the final decision. The specific arguments from this letter were used in the original brief presented October 8, 2004, on pages two (2) through thirty-three (33) of the “brief of petitioner” portion listed in the table of contents. (That original brief was rejected and this one is a re-submission of brief.)

On July 29, 2004, The same day the e-mail and faxed requests were received by the UCBR, the staff of the UCBR prepared a packet of several form letters, acknowledging receipt of communications, but did not include any copies of the record of the hearing.

On August 4, 2004, five (5) days later, UCBR denied the request for reconsideration leaving the denial decision standing as final.

On August 5, 2004 claimant filed official forms, requesting an appeal to the decision of the UCBR, in the Commonwealth Court of Pa., prior to the 30 day deadline of August 30, 2004, and following the denial for reconsideration.

On September 2, 2004 a motion was filed and approved requesting permission to submit fewer number of briefs to the Commonwealth Court of Pa. claimant had still not received copies of hearing records that were imperative to the preparation of the court brief.

There was also a discrepancy existing with the name of legal council for the UCBR, listed on the order to submit a brief by October 12, 2004. Council listed was Clifford Blaze, Esquire, c/o UCBR, respondent. Unable to locate a phone # for attorney Blaze.

On October 8, 2004 Claimant traveled to Harrisburg, Pa and hand delivered five (5) copies of brief to the Commonwealth Court of Pa. prior to the October 12, 2004 deadline.

Also, one (1) copy of brief and certificate of service were delivered and accepted by ms. Denise Roddy, Supervisor of UCBR, 10 th floor Labor and Industry Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. Ms. Roddy signed the receipt of acceptance and explained that Clifford Blaze, Esquire had left his assignment as legal council for the UCBR in August 2004 and she was currently handling appeals for the UCBR. Claimant had still received no response to two (2) requests for copies of hearing records, but was forced to submit a brief before the deadline.

On October 13, 2004 five (5) days later, claimant received an order of rejection of brief with a full list of required form, but no listing of any specific inconsistency to acceptable form. There was also no copy of brief returned with the order.

This created great unfair demand to create and submit a new brief because no indication was given as to why the original had been rejected. The new deadline for submission was November 12, 2004.

On October 25, 2004 claimant e-mailed a third (3rd) request to the UCBR to please expidite the July 29th telephone and e-mail request for copies of the hearing records.

On October 26, 2004 that e-mail was responded to and a transcript of the taped testimony of the employers representative was forwarded to the claimant by Gerard M. Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Council for UCBR. However, on page two (2) of the transcript a reference was made to documents #1 through #31 being placed into the file before the employers representative arrived at the referee’s office. The representative was given an opportunity to look at them and then they were entered into the record and the representative was sworn in to begin testimony.

On October 25, 2004 claimant mailed a hard copy letter to the Commonwealth Court requesting, “to re-open records of this proceeding for the reception of further evidence.” and also requesting a verification that all major testimony and correspondence, from claimant to the UCBR, were available in the file presented to the Commonwealth Court of Pa.

“My main concerns are that you have copies of: 15 page initial letter to UCBR requesting an appeal, a 50 page packet of sample communications to my superiors and a 34 page letter requesting a reconsideration of the UCBR denial of my request for an appeal. and an authentic copy of corporate termination rules to be included.”. (none was presented to the referee, termination policy and “just cause” requirements were accepted on hearsayof the representative).

On October 26, 2004 a response to that letter was prepared and mailed to claimant by Mr. C.R. Hostutler, Deputy Prothonotary/Chief Clerk. Verification was given of the presence of a 15 page initial letter, a 50-page packet of sample correspondence to superiors and the five page brief request for reconsideration that was faxed on July 29, 2004.

It was discovered that the hard copy full request for reconsideration, with itemized points of dispute, that was post-marked the same day, was not included in the file. There was no mention of records and transcripts of the hearing that were available.

“If you believe the record is incomplete, you may file a motion to modify the record with this court.” The motion to modify the record was the letter he was responding to. The request to re-open the records for reception of further evidence was already submitted.

On November 3, 2004 claimant e-mailed a forth (4th) request for full release of all records of hearing, specifically documents #1 through #31 that were entered into the record on page two (2) of the transcript, but not identified or quoted from during the hearing and not presented by the employers representative during testimony. (Claimant is now facing a deadline of November 12, 2004 for re-submission of brief.)

On November 8, 2004 The 4th request to the UCBR for the remaining records of the hearing, specifically documents labeled #1 (one) through #31 (thirty-one) have not been forwarded for inspection or consideration in the preparation of the replacement brief demanded by C.R. Hostutler, Deputy Prothonotary/Chief Clerk.

Claimant is therefore requesting an immediate remand or reversal with prejudice on this case due to lack of timely release of records that are imperative to the preparation of the brief.

We are now four (4) days from the deadline of November 12, 2004 slated for submission. It is inconsistent with PA Code 101.54 which requires timely release of “INFORMATION FROM THE FILE” that are necessary for the preparation of a brief.

Updated 2-25-07 by Dawn Naret’ to merge the original file “Statement of the Case” with later update and continuation of the chronological activity.

Current Contact Info:Dawn Naret’, P.O. Box 2315, Pittsburgh, Pa., 15230-2315

STATEMENT OF THE CASE2-26-05 UPDATE OF CHRONOLOGICAL ACTIVITY
BY DAWN NARET’,
ATTORNEY PRO SEDOCKET NO. 1742 CD 2004

NOVEMBER 10 Post-mailed Official Motion by Appellant to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice to Commonwealth Court. Included a duplicate copy of the 34 page letter, requesting re-consideration, that was not appended to the record by UCBR, as verified by Mr Hostutler, Chief Prothonotary. E-mailed copy and Certificate of Service to Gerard Mackarevich .

NOVEMBER 11, 2004 Phone call from Mr. Don Wagner, Prothonotary clerk, requesting Copy of Certificate of Service for Motion to be forwarded. Acknowledged receipt of Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice.Provided Fax # 717-787-9559. “no hard-copy follow up required”

NOVEMBER 11, 2004 Phoned P. Michael Sturla, Pa State Representative to request permission to have faxing done by his staff. He agreed to leave written permission for assistance to be given Monday – I declined immediate need.

NOVEMBER 12, 2004 Discovered that E-Mail to Deputy Mackarevich was returned by the UC Dept. staff with a note that this should be sent to Commonwealth Court (??).Faxed copies instead to number listed on Deputy Mackarevich’s stationery 717-783-5027. – “Successful Transmission” – From F&M College Campus.

NOVEMBER 12, 2004 Also faxed copy of Certificate of Service to Mr. Wagner, per his request, at number provided, “Successful Send” – From F&M College Campus.

November 14, 2004 Prepared Addendum to Motion of the Appellant to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice and faxed to both Commonwealth Court at the number provided by Mr. Wagner, Prothonotary Ofc. And to Deputy Mackarevich at his ofc. Fax number. Included a cover letter with a 5 th request for the remaining records, specifically items #1 to #31. Transmission Incompleted at F&M College Campus. Resent both from Office of P. Michael Sturla, Pa State Representative. –”Successful Send” left copy in his office file.

NOVEMBER 26, Received copy and Certificate of Service for 11/24/04 Motion by UCBR to Dismiss Petitioner”s Appeal, submitted by UCBR Counsel, Janet M. Tarczy, Assistant counsel for UCBR. Motion, in its text, acknowledges receipt of; 10/25/04 request for records that was E-Mailed to the same address; as the later Motion by the Appellant to Remand, that the staff refused to accept for Deputy Mackarevich. Therefore, this was a correct number and the delivery should not have been refused.

The text in the Motion by the UCBR to Dismiss, also acknowledges receipt of my 11/8/04 Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice, plus Addendum, plus cover letter making the 5 th request for missing records.

NOVEMBER 29, 2004 Prepared Opposition to the Motion by Janet M. Tarczy to Dismiss the Petitioner’s Appeal.

NOVEMBER 30, 2004 Faxed copies of Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss to both Counselors Mackarevich and Tarczy at UCBR and to Commonwealth Court, using same correct fax numbers. – “Successful Transmission” from the office of P. Michael Sturla, Pa State Representative. Left a copy of this plus 5 other letters of communication, pertaining to this case, in his hard copy file.

Transmitted E-Mail msg. and attachment of Opposition to Motion to Dismiss document to his Legal Liaison, Pat Coller to make available in his system file.

DECEMBER 6, 2004 Received notice from Prothonotary’s office that this case will be dismissed, per request of UCBR, due to lack of reponses or evident interest from appellant, IF a brief is not submitted by Dec. 15, 2004.

* Prothonotary Clerk is still refusing to submit the motion to remand or reverse with prejudice TO THE JUDGE, as is required to be done, immediately upon receipt. The prothonotary clerk is ALSO still demanding submission of a brief which was deemed a canceled dead-line requirement, upon the submission of the motion to remand or reverse with prejudice.

BRIEF WAS NOT SUBMITTED – BECAUSE LEGAL PA PROTOCOL CANCELED IT AS A REQUIRED SUBMISSION, PENDING INVESTIGATION, BY THE JUDGE, INTO COMPLAINTS OF LACK OF COOPERATION FROM UCBR.

THE UCBR HAD 20 DAYS TO DEFEND THEMSELVES TO THE COMPLAINT AND NEVER OFFERED A DEFENCE. THEY INSTEAD FILED A MOTION TO DISMISS THE APPELLENT’S CASE. A CLEAR REJECTION OF PROPER PROTOCOL AND FINAL EVIDENCE THAT VERIFIED AND VALIDATED THE APPELLANTS CHARGE OF NO COOPERATION.

CASE WAS DISMISSED AND CLOSED 12-15-04 BY DECISION OF THE ATTORNEY FOR THE UCBR COMMANDING AND CONTROLLING THE PROTHONOTARY CLERK.

(The official Judge never heard of it or saw the evidence – the PA Judicial System was to corrupt to follow the proper procedural process).

(JUNE 27, 2007 “ STATEMENT ” OF EVENTS UPDATED, BY DAWN NARET’, FOR WEB PUBLISHING)

ON DEC. 13, 2005, APPELLANT WAS EVICTED FROM APARTMENT FOR NON-PAYMENT OF RENT. HAVING NO WHERE TO GO, NO MONEY AND NO VEHICLE, SET OUT ON FOOT. WITH A PULL TOTE. ALL PERSONAL BELONGINGS WERE LOST, INCLUDING FAMILY PHOTOS, HISTORY, ANTIQUES AND PIECES OF ORIGINAL ART, COLLECTOR PRINTS AND LITHOGRAPHS
.
APPELLANT WAS FORCED TO SEEK SHELTER IN THE LOCAL TOWN HOMELESS SHELTER.
OVER-EXPOSURE TO INSECTICIDE AND A DEPLORABLE ENVIRONMENT, NOW FOLLOWED THE RECENT ON-SET OF DETERIORATING HEALTH THAT WAS INITIATED WHILE EMPLOYED AT THE LAST JOB POSITION.

THERE WERE CONSTANT ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANTS CAUSING AN ABNORMAL INCREASE IN THE OCCURRENCE OF RESPIRATORY AND INFECTIOUS ILLNESSES AMONG STAFF AND RESIDENTS.
APPELLANT WAS HOSPITALIZED AND DIAGNOSED WITH C.O.P.D., CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE AND PERMANENT LUNG DAMAGE.

APPLICATION FOR SOCIAL SECURITY MEDICAL DISABILITY WAS FILED AND APPROVED AND APPEALANT COULD NEVER WORK AGAIN.
THE CASH BENEFIT FROM SOCIAL SECURITY WAS ONLY $940. PER MONTH WITH NO MEDICARE COVERAGE PERMITTED FOR 2 YEARS. (8/17/08 ADDED  - PA STATE HAS BEEN ILLEGALLY TAKING A GARNISHMENT OF 15% , WHICH #1 IS ILLEGAL BECAUSE GARNISHMENT IS FORBIDDEN, WHERE THE SOCIAL SECURITY MEDICAL DISABILITY IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF INCOME. AND #2 WHEN IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO GARNISH, IT CANNOT EXCEED 10% OF BENEFIT CHECK. THEY HAVE ALSO BEEN SEIZING MY FEDERAL INCOME TAX REFUND, FOR 22 YEARS AND HAVE, 1N 2008, SEIZED MY FEDERAL “SPENDING STIPEND” BONUS REBATE. THE ORIGINAL LOAN WAS $5000. THEY HAVE SOLD IT AND CHANGED COLLECTORS SOMETIMES 1-3 TIMES PER YEAR.

Each one of the new take overs (some working out of the same office and phone number, but using a different name and using an excuse to add new charges) they have each added service fees and interest amounting to as much and more than the monthly payments bringing my current balance to above the original loan, after 22 years.

THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DEMANDED A GARNISHMENT, FOR A DELINQUENT STUDENT LOAN, TO BE SEIZED EVERY MONTH OUT OF THE BENEFIT CHECK, REDUCING INCOME TO $750 PER MONTH AND CANCELLED STATE MEDICAL COVERAGE THE SAME DAY THAT FEDERAL DISABILITY WAS APPROVED.

STATE AND FEDERAL SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES CONTINUE TO ACT WITH OBSTRUCTION AND PREJUDICE, IE: SECTION 8 LOW-INCOME HOUSING APPLICATION WAS REJECTED THREE TIMES FOR LANDLORD EVICTION OR BAD CREDIT REPORT. ALSO ACTION HOUSING AGENCY REJECTED APPLICATION FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING, DUE TO BAD CREDIT REPORT. THESE ATROSITIES OF PRDJUDICE AGAINST HOMELESS PEOPLE IN FINANCIAL CRISIS ARE PREVENTING THE POSSIBILITY OF OBTAINING HOUSING. THE MEGER INCOME WOULD NOT AFFORD RENT, UTILITIES AND FOOD.

JUNE 27, 2007 APPEALANT IS STILL HOMELESS AND RECEIVING APPROX. $750 PER MONTH SOCIAL SECURITY INCOME, WHICH DOES NOT LAST 30 DAYS, WHILE FORCED TO OBTAIN MEALS IN RESTURANTS. USUALLY, THE LAST 2 WEEKS OF THE MONTH ARE SPENT EATING CRACKERS OR CHIPS.

NIGHTS ARE SPENT SITTING UP ON A BENCH WAITING UNTIL THE BUSSES START RUNNING SO YOU CAN GET TO A BATHROOM.

SLEEP OCCURS IN SHORT DOZING PERIODS, WHENEVER YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH IT, WITHOUT SOMEONE TAPPING YOU ON THE SHOULDER AND TELLING YOU THAT YOU CAN’T SLEEP HERE. …………….SOME CITIZENS ARE LESS THAN HUMAN.

Current Contact info:
Dawn Naret’
P.O. Box 2315,Pittsburgh, Pa., 15230-2315
EMAIL: (CONTINUED NEXT PAGE)

DAWN NARET’

EMAIL:Reply2dn@gmail.com
dawnaret@yahoo.co.ukWEB SITES:
http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/ “WE THE PEOPLE”
http://www.chagrinning.blogspot.com/ “CHAGRINNING”
http://www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com/ “BUDDY, CAN YOU SPARE A LATTE ?”
http://www.dawnnaret.blog.com/ “58 YEAR OLD NATURAL-BORN LADY”  
<div align=”center”><script language=”JavaScript” src=”http://www.tech-counter.com/techcount.php?page=http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com&style=LED_g&digits=6″ mce_src=”http://www.tech-counter.com/techcount.php?page=http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com&style=LED_g&digits=6″ type=”text/javascript”><!–

 

 

 

   //–></script><br /><a href=”http://www.nyplasticsurg.com” mce_href=”http://www.nyplasticsurg.com”>gynecomastia</a></div>

  EXIBIT #2 MOTION TO REMAND OR REVERSE WITH PREJUDICE 

MOTION TO REMAND or REVERSE WITH PREJUDICE

 NARET’ v. UCBR (2004) NO. 1742 CD 2004

   

Dawn Naret’, Attorney for the Appellant

P.O. Box 643

Lancaster, Pa. 17608

  

Commonwealth Court of Pa

Irvis Office Bldg. – Room 624

Harrisburg, Pa. 17120

November 8, 2004

I am submitting, today, an official motion to immediately remand or

reverse with prejudice, the case referenced above.

I have made four (4) requests for full records of the hearing held

April 21, 2004 and did finally have the kind intervention of  Gerard

M. Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Council of UCBR, who recently moved to

assist with the incompleted cases of Clifford Blaze, Esquire, who left

in August, 2004.

Deputy Markarevich forwarded the transcript of the taped testimony on

my 3rd request of  October 25, 2004 to the UCBR for all records. The

deadline for my brief had been October 12, 2004. I submitted brief, in

person, on October 8, 2004 and it was rejected by an Unnamed Person

who did not return them, but sent me a form instruction list of

required brief form and gave me a new deadline of November 12, 2004.

That is only four (4) days away and it is clear that these records

have not been forwarded within reasonable time as required by

Pennsylvania Code 101.54 stating; “When an interested party or his

representative requests information from the file of the Board in

order to present and maintain the issues at a hearing before a referee

or the Board, or in an appeal to the Court, such information

(including the hearing transcript, where the record was transcribed)

shall be made available at a reasonable time to the party and his

representative, without charge.”

    

Upon examination of these transcripts, it was discovered that before

the employers witness arrived, there was were thirty-one (31)

documents already present in the file. The witness was given an

opportunity to view them, upon arrival, and did not object to their

inclusion in the file. But the items were Never mentioned in the

hearing, never identified and never quoted from.

I Immediately made a 4th request to the UCBR, repeating that I needed

ALL RECORDS OF THE HEARING and I have had no response.

It should be clarified to this honorable Court, that on page one (1)

of the transcript, the referee is verifying names and addresses:

 ”The employer of record is Beverly Health Care in care of TALX UC

Express, P. O. Box 283, St. Louis Missouri, 63166. Is that the address

you’d like to use?”.  Five (5) sentences later, is a partial response

sentence stating; ” This is just a corporate…” (unfinished statement).

The truth is that TALX is not the employer or even affiliated with the

employer except as a service-contractor, hired to appeal EVERY

Unemployment Compensation Claim filed, in order to reduce the

obligatory payments, of the employer, to the State Treasury

Department, for the use in UC Benefit payments. It was TALX who filed

this appeal after the employer already denied a situation of willful

misconduct on the initial fact-finding.

TALX is therefore not the employer or even a viable interested party

because they are not attorneys qualifying as representatives,

acceptable to present evidence or give testimony without being

Judicially objected to as hearsay.

May I cite:  Phila. Elec. Co. v. UCBR, 129 Pa Cmwlth 417, 565 A2d 1246 (1989):

“It is hearsay for a Licensed Physicians Assistant to read a test

report into evidence where the assistant is not the person who

conducted the test.”, ( The Physician Assistant’s reading of a lab

report on test samples is not the testimony of an expert witness on

the stand using his/her expertise, rather, “it is the testimony of a

witness who merely reiterates and parrots the conclusions of

another.”) ld.@ 1248.

Also, according to; Perminter v. UCBR 426 A2d 245:

” Hearsay evidence, although properly objected to, may be used as a

basis for further questioning by the referee. The testimony elicited

through the hearsay itself must NOT be given substantive evidentiary

value.” ( It is then of itself, inadmissible as evidence and should be

struck from the record).

These documents, labeled #1 (one) through # 31 (thirty-one), which I

still have not  received, were not presented by the employer, who

attended the hearing and brought only one exhibit labeled employer’s

exhibit # 1 (one). They also were never mentioned in the hearing,

never identified and never quoted from.

     

Therefore, as they have been held from inspection, necessary for the

proper presentation of this appeal, I make a motion that these

documents labeled #1 (one) through #31 (thirty-one) be viewed as

hearsay evidence and in suspect of authenticity or relevance to this

specific claimant and be struck from the record as inadmissible or

hearsay evidence that could adversely affect the fact-finding and

evaluation of this case.

On the initial fact-finding, conducted by the Department of

Unemployment Compensation, the employer denied that the claimant was

terminated for “willful misconduct”, and listed “poor work

performance” as their motivating factor and also stated that “she did

the best she could”. This was NOT a charge of “willful misconduct”.

During the hearing, the transcripts reveal that the employer, although

still not admitting that the claimant was unfairly accused of

incidents that she insisted she was not a party to, still heard the

referee remind her, (according to page two (2) of the transcript),

that she held the BURDEN OF PROOF to present evidence that “willful

misconduct” had occurred. She STILL DENIED IT UNDER OATH and testified

that the claimant was terminated for “poor work performance”.

 On the last line of page five (5) she is asked if the incident,

(which the claimant denied being part of), was considered a serious

“Category I” incident, (the company classifies either a Category I or

a Category II on complaints) and the EW (employers witness) stated:

“Actually, no it was Category II.”

On page six (6), an explanation of the Categories is requested by the referee:

EMPLOYER: (straight testimony without interruption):

“Actually Category…if we… Category II is the LESS serious of the

Categories. Category I is the more serious and corporate actually

changed that somewhat within the past year. If in other words if we

give a Category I they expect us to immediately suspend somebody. So

we now for the most part use Category II’s unless it’s something

extremely, extremely serious. We tend to use the Category II because

it fits right in with POOR WORK QUALITY. It’s a 2 point…2.2, It’s POOR

WORK QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY and that’s…”

The employer is then asked what the policy is then for Category II

(less serious) policy and she explains:

     

EMPLOYER:

“Right…right oh…and she was….actually I’m sorry I should’ve

said…mentioned that…after 4 warnings the counceling’s don’t count.

After 4 warnings it’s suspension  pending investigation for

termination. And that was her 4th”.

   

Therefore, although the employer appears to have satisfied the four

warnings requirement for suspension, she never testified whether there

was an investigation conducted as was ALSO required, according to her

testimony. There were several discrepancies in the testimony of the

employer that are not consistent with issues that occurred or that

qualify

within the judicial definition of “willful misconduct”. The employer

stated and again repeated that the claimant was charged with Category

II , LESS serious complaints and a 2 point complaint is POOR WORK

QUALITY.

WILLFUL MISCONDUCT WAS NEVER PROVEN BY THE EMPLOYER. The employer also

failed to present an official copy of the current company policy of

required procedure for termination. The reasons and the procedure

testified to, were not acceptable reasons for termination, according

to actual company policy. The referee accepted hearsay testimony of

questionable documents #1 (one) through #31 (thirty-one) AND hearsay

testimony of what the disciplinary policy was and was blindly misled

to believe that the claimant was terminated with “just cause”.

The term “just cause” may vary in as many specific interpretations as

there are different employers who determine their own policies and

procedures. That is why the UCBR is forbidden to deny benefits

according to proven “just cause”, but must have proof of  “willful

misconduct”, fully demonstrated as Judicially Defined in Section 402

(e):

(1) the wanton and willful disregard of the employer’s interests, or

(2) the deliberate violation of rules; or

(3) the disregard of standards of behavior which an employer can

rightfully expect from his employee; or

(4) negligence which manifests as culpability, wrongful INTENT,  EVIL

DESIGN OR INTENTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIAL disregard for the employer’s

interests or the employee’s duties and obligations.

These are extremely serious, intentional/deliberate/willful actions

that MUST occur before a label of “willful misconduct” can be applied.

Negligence of clocking back in after lunch may be a company’s policy

for “just cause” termination, if committed repeatedly, but it is not a

negligence of the magnitude of  the judicial definition of “willful

misconduct” required to deny benefits and none were even intimated by

the employer and definitely none were proven because none occurred.

My third reason for submitting a motion to remand and reverse with

prejudice, is that the UCBR failed to amend a 34-page letter of

request for reconsideration to the record of the case. On July 29,

2004 I responded to the letter of denial on appeal from the UCBR

decision of July 21, 2004.  I sent on that day; an e-mail requesting

copies of all records, I faxed a five (5) page brief letter of timely

appeal for reconsideration and I post-marked a hard copy letter of

detailed point by point dispute to the procedure opinions and findings

as stated in the denial letter.

   

I am forwarding a duplicate copy with this communication. I already

submitted a petition to open the record for admission of additional

evidence on October 25, 2004, which was the letter responded to by

C.R. Hostutler on October 26, 2004. The purpose of that request was

the extended wait for copies of the record that I anticipated might

need additional rebuttal opportunity. This copy of the 34 page letter

is not new evidence but was part of the record of the request for

reconsideration WHERE THE REQUEST WAS DENIED AND NOT APPENDED TO THE

RECORD FOR EVALUATION UPON APPEAL TO THE COMMONWEALTH COURT.

This is yet another violation of Pennsylvania Code:

“Where written application for reopening of a hearing was made to the

board and there is no evidence that the referee or the board appended

to the record the request, ANY supporting material, and the ruling on

the request, A DISMISSAL OF THE CLAIMANTS APPEAL WILL BE REVERSED AND

THE RECORD REMANDED FOR A DETERMINATION OF PROPER CAUSE FOR CLAIMANTS

FAILURE TO ATTEND THE REFEREE’S HEARING.”

-ORTIZ V. UCBR 85 PA CMWLTH, 327, 331, 481 A2D 1385

“Finally, a “proper cause” inquiry for non-appearance does NOT

impermissibly reallocate the burden of proof in a “willful misconduct”

setting.”.

-FLORES V. UCBR 686 A 2D 66 (PA CMWLTH 1996)

With this over-whelming amount of error clearly proven in the

transcripts and records, I can only trust that this honorable Court

will end the injustice that has so extremely burdened and financially

destroyed this claimant since the initial  unfair dismissal from her

job. Evidence proves that she was an excellent example of a

self-starter who gave extra effort in every area to assist her

employer with compliance to all laws, policies and organizational

efforts.

This attempt, by the employer to be released from payment of UC

Benefits stands as a despicable example of dishonest manipulation of

the Law and of the calendars of all the departments who have given

focus to this case. The employer’s witness could not bring herself to

state “willful misconduct” because she knew it never existed in this

claimant’s performance. And she admitted it twice in clarity.

  

The claimant, meanwhile:

(1)  has a ruined reputation of job performance,

(2)  was unexpectedly cut off from her only source of income when the

referee made the error of reversing her initial correct determination

of ELIGIBLE to denied  benefits,

(3)  she has suffered through five (5) whole months of absolutely no income,

(4)  has been penniless without even 50 cents to buy a newspaper or

take a bus for any job searching or attending,

(5)  her monthly accounts have not been able to receive any payments

and have now      been reported to the Credit Bureau

(6)  the Credit Bureau will now be giving an unfavorable report on her

FOR 7 YEARS

(7)   she will have difficulty obtaining a new position from an unfair

record of her      work

(8)   she will have difficulty passing a credit check for a new position

(9)   she will have difficulty passing a credit check for a new residence

(10) she has received notice of utilities to be turned off for non-payment

(11) she has received notice of eviction proceedings initiated already

by her landlord

(12) her bank has closed both her checking and savings accounts for

having a zero balance for too long

(13)  she was seeking food at food banks to survive

(14)  has suffered immense stress and will continue to be adversely

affected by this horrible miscarriage of justice for many years

(15) she has no family or friends to move in with and will become homeless

(16) she will have no address to receive mail of notice of hearing or

reinstatement or receive benefit checks necessary to survive

starvation and death

(17) if you have no residence address, you are not eligible for food

stamps or food bank donation pick-ups.

  

The state cuts you off and leaves you to starvation.

This is a shocking reality that must come to light for the protection

of citizens in this country. These aggressive moves to cut citizens

off from income is resulting in unbelievable numbers of increased

homelessness.

          

The UCBR admits to denying 100 to 200 cases per day just in one

office.  To extend the multiplication, that is 24,000 to 48,000

citizen families per year placed in this position of possible

homelessness and total destruction to the magnitude that this claimant

is living as the very current reality of facing death within weeks

from now in spite of being totally healthy, with no acute, chronic or

fatal illness. What is Pennsylvania State doing to it’s citizens? Why

are they denying with prejudice, benefits for people who have worked

all their lives? Now, to find out that if you no longer have an

address, you are ineligible for any aid declared to be available to

the needy. Who is more needy than a person who has no home?

This case  never should have reached this point or been extended to

this amount of time or have to have traveled to this level of the

judicial system before someone would stop the violations of Civil

Rights, of Due Process, of UC Law and of Pa Codes and Statutes.

We have a very well designed litigation system, when it is followed

according to the original rules and intentions. The system was a

non-prejudice system that protected employees from being unfairly

dismissed or denied benefits during the transitional period. Of recent

years it has been digressing toward a system of prejudice for the

employer and denial of Due Process for the claimants.

The major problem seems to be the cutting off of UC Benefits before an

appeal has been decided. Helpful to this may first be to revise the

initial appeal rules to reject appeals being filed by these contract

companies that receive commission on every case they book into appeal

of eligibility. They are creating havoc on the calendar and causing

delays of reinstatement that never should have been lost and have

created financial crisis while they were cut-off. They also are not

able to present evidence or testimony as I have shown you in the Pa

Codes. Their involvement in these cases is inadmissible and removal of

them would greatly reduce the number of unjustified applications for

appeal of eligibility.

A second major problem seems to be a misunderstanding of the referee’s

between termination for “just cause” by the employer and the true

requirements of the label “willful misconduct”. Too many cases are

being denied without meeting the requirements of the full judicial

definition of the term “willful misconduct”

Of serious crisis development is that the Department of Unemployment

Compensation cuts off benefits immediately, upon the referee’s

decision to reverse the eligible status, without giving any

consideration to the fact that the case has entered an appeal status

and the determination is not a final.

Next, the same department sends out a Repayment Due notice, in this

case it was assigned as a “no-fault” repay obligation for funds

already received.  THE CLAIMANT MUST NOW ALSO REQUEST THE COURT TO

PERMIT RELIEF FROM THIS REPAYMENT OBLIGATION ON FUNDS SHE WAS ENTITLED

TO RECEIVE AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CUT OFF FROM.

CLAIMANT MUST ALSO APPEAL TO THE COURT TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT

THIS CRISIS CREATED BY SO MANY ERRORS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PERMITTED

TO REACH THIS POINT AND THE CLAIMANT IS REQUESTING RELEASE OF BENEFIT

CHECKS FOR EVERY WEEK SINCE CUT OFF ON MAY 11, 2004 UNTIL DECISION

DATE. AND THEREAFTER FOR AN UNLIMITED AMOUNT OF TIME, AS IT SHALL

TAKE, TO OBTAIN EMPLOYMENT AND RETAIN EMPLOYMENT, BECAUSE SHE WAS

ROBBED OF THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADJUST THROUGH THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD

WITH THE AID OF UC BENEFITS AND ENDED UP INSTEAD ON THE OUTSIDE OF A

HUGE IRON CURTAIN THAT HAD NO EMPATHY OR SHAME FOR IT’S ABUSES.

But, these errors should be caught and corrected immediately by the

UCBR. Why are they passed through?

Why is the UCBR consistently violating Pa Code with endless

merry-go-round arguments that they will not re-open a case or consider

a remand because the claimant failed to attend a hearing? I have also

shown you that these arguments are now ceased forever. They are

inconsistent with the UC Law, Commonwealth Court Standards, Pa Code,

Federal Laws and Civil Rights. The constant defense that they write

their own policy and what violations, they are alledged to have

committed, are acceptable according to their policy, is unacceptable

to the higher authorities according to the higher Laws and

policies that they are obligated to be consistent with in their policymaking..

May I cite: VAN v. UCBR 508 PA 139, 494 A2D 1081 (1985):

“ALTHOUGH THE HEARINGS ARE INFORMAL, THEY INVOLVE SWORN TESTIMONY,

CROSS-EXAMINATION AND RECORDING OF THE PROCEEDINGS. AN ADMINISTRATIVE

TRIBUNAL IS NOT BOUND BY ALL THE EVIDENTIARY AND PROCEDURAL RULES OF A

LAW COURT SO LONG AS CERTAIN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE HONORED, INCLUDING

THE RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DUE PROCESS OF LAW.”

THIS MUST BE THE END OF POLICIES BEING MIS-INTERPRETED OR USED WITHOUT

FULL APPROVAL AND PROPER AMMENDMENT THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE HIGHER

RIGHTS AND STANDARDS AND LAWS PROTECTING THESE INDIVIDUALS THEY SERVE.

           

I thank you very much for a most enlightening experience. I have

learned much and hope to be able to use the expanded knowledge

productively, if I am unable to save my own life, perhaps my testimony

will inspire changes in the system that may save someone else’s life.

  

You face an extremely serious responsibility of not only attempting to

have my funds released and delivered before it is too late, but to

initiate immediate changes in this predatory system that has knarled

its demon head above the values and honor, that our country and our

judicial system once held as it’s identity and it’s genuine character.

      

DAWN M. NARET’

Current Contact Info as of 2-23-07:

P.O.Box 2315 Pittsburgh, Pa 15230-2315

reply2dn@gmail.com

dawnaret@yahoo.co.uk

ADDENDUM TO:

 

MOTION TO REMAND OR REVERSE WITH PREJUDICE

CASE NO. 1742 CD 2004

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 10, 2004

APPENDED NOVEMBER 14, 2004

BY DAWN M. NARET’, ATTORNEY FOR THE APPELLANT

 

 

On April 21, 2004, during the original hearing, the claimant called into the office with a question on directions and was told that the hearing had already started and she would not be able to attend. She requested a continuance of a few minutes until she could arrive and the denial was repeated that the hearing had already started and she would not be able to attend.  

Within minutes, she called back, a second time and requested permission to at least drop-off a written testimony, with supporting documents of evidence, that she wished to present and have considered before a final decision. 

This request was also denied and she was told that she would have an opportunity to present written testimony in an appeal to the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR), if the referee decided in favor of the employer. 

I hold this interactive incident as further evidence of prejudice that has been unjustly obstructing the right to due process and a fair hearing, without prejudice, as required to be conducted by the UCBR. 

May I repeat VANN v. UCBR 508 Pa 139, 494 A2d 1081 (1985):

“ALTHOUGH THE HEARINGS ARE INFORMAL, THEY INVOLVE SWORN TESTIMONY, CROSS-EXAMINATION AND RECORDING OF THE PROCEEDINGS. AN ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IS NOT BOUND BY ALL THE EVIDENTIARY AND PROCEDURAL RULES OF A LAW COURT, SO LONG AS CERTAIN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE HONORED, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DUE PROCESS OF LAW.

 

 

 

 

The claimant appeals to this honorable court to acknowledge, in their conclusion, that where opinions and policies have, on several occasions, agreed that if an employer is absent from the hearing, then the available record, which is usually the initial fact-finding plus the additional written testimony and material evidence, mailed in by the employer, as reasons why they are appealing an initial determination of eligibility, will be enough information in the record for the referee to evaluate and make a final decision, even in the absence of the employer. 

The charge of prejudice lies in the acceptance of the additional written testimony, with any material evidence, that has been mailed-in and accepted into the record, in the absence of the employer, to be considered before a final decision by the referee. 

If then, the employer has been given the opportunity to mail-in additional written testimony and material evidence, to be entered into the record before a final decision, even in his/her absence, then the same situation, from the aspect of the claimant, where the claimant is absent from the hearing, and the referee is permitted to conduct the hearing in their absence and determine a final decision based upon the available record, which includes the written testimony and material evidence mailed-in, by the employer, with their petition for an appeal, then the claimant, who is absent, is not being given the same opportunity for a fair hearing unless they are also afforded the same opportunity to deliver or mail-in written testimony as the employer did. 

A final decision, where the employer was afforded the opportunity to add additional written testimony to the record and the claimant was denied or not offered the same opportunity, is a final decision formed with prejudice, and the claimant has not been offered the opportunity for a fair hearing. 

Due process has then been violated if the final decision is made in the absence of the claimant and a continuance has been denied. Also, the employer was not obligated to prove “proper cause” for being absent, in order to have his/her written testimony accepted into the record prior to the final decision, and neither can the claimant be demanded to prove, “proper cause” for absence, before being afforded an opportunity for submitting a written testimony. 

The absence of a claimant does not waive the right to due process and a Fair Hearing. Therefore, having a hearing scheduled, where they could not attend, was NOT giving them full opportunity for a fair hearing, if the opportunity for submission of written testimony, to be evaluated before a final decision has been made, has been denied.

The referee is obligated to decide these cases on their merit, according to the information available in the record. If that information is unjustly accepted from one party and not the other party, then the merit is not fairly determinable, if the referee is evaluating, with prejudice, the record of only one party.

The opportunity to submit written testimony cannot be denied to the claimant, if it is not denied to the employer. A final decision must include additional written testimony, of the claimant, if it accepts additional written testimony of the employer.  

The initial fact-finding affords the employer an initial testimony written into the record. The employee is notified of the fact-finding comments, of the employer, in the initial determination letter from the Unemployment Compensation Department (UC Dept.). 

The employee is NOT given an opportunity to cross-examine or rebutt any of these comments. If the UC Dept. determines that the employee is eligible for benefits, the employer is afforded the opportunity to appeal the determination and is given a SECOND opportunity in stating reasons why they seek appeal and to attach any material evidence they wish to have accepted into the record. The employee is not given an opportunity to cross-examine or rebutt any of these new comments either, until the hearing. 

If the employee cannot attend the hearing, then there are TWO mailed-in written testimonies of the employer and NONE from the employee, to be evaluated according to merit. What is going to be evaluated? It is a ONE-SIDED, PREJUDICED EVALUATION PROCESS.

Now, if there is yet the attendance of the employer, with or without accompanying witnesses, giving oral testimony, objecting to the eligibility of benefits, in the absence of the employee, then the merit, of the record, now contains at least THREE and possibly more testimonies, if witnesses were present, from the employer and NONE from the employee.

In both situations, where the employer is absent or not absent, the record is unjustly tipped in favor of the employer and is obviously being evaluated with prejudice, if it is evaluated without at least ONE opportunity, for even ONE written testimony to be entered into the record, from the employee, in the event of their absence from the physical hearing. They clearly have NOT been afforded the opportunity of a fair hearing. 

The obligatory evaluation, without prejudice, by the referee, before making a final decision, cannot be waived by the referee, by the claimant, by the employer or by the UCBR, who are also obligated to assure the opportunity for a fair hearing and order a continuance if there is any doubt that this was accomplished at the referee’s hearing. A ONE-SIDED, PREJUDICED EVALUATION PROCESS is definitely cause to doubt that a fair hearing was indeed afforded. 

 

 

 

 

 

It is a Constitutional Right to due process, without prejudice, and it is a Fundamental Right that the UCBR is obligated to be consistent with in their policymaking, according to, again I would like to reiterate: VAN V. UCBR 508 PA 139, 494 A2d 1081 (1985), “SO LONG AS CERTAIN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE HONORED, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DUE PROCESS OF LAW.”

These Fundamental Rights, even in an informal UCBR setting, were already upheld by the Supreme Court in; DILLIPLAIN v. LEHIGH VLY. TRUST CO. 457 PA 255, 322 A2d 114 (1974). AND DILLIPLAIN WAS LATER SPECIFICALLY EXTENDED TO COVER UCBR PROCEEDINGS IN WING v. UCBR.

IN WING v. UCBR 496 PA 113, 436 A2d 179 (1981), the Supreme Court advised the UCBR to, “DISCARD THE DOCTRINE”. The Supreme Court explained the rationale for “DISCARDING THE DOCTRINE”, (the doctrine of Fundamental error) by noting; ” THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TRIBUNAL MUST BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT ITS ERRORS AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE; DILIGENT PREPARATION AND EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY, BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, MUST BE ENCOURAGED BY REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO DEVELOPE COMPLETE RECORDS AND ADVANCE ALL LEGAL THEORIES AND THE FINALITY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL’S DETERMINATIONS MUST NOT BE ERODED BY TREATING EACH DETERMINATION AS A PART OF A SEQUENCE OF PIECEMEAL ADJUDICATIONS.” – Id, @ 117, 436 A2d @ 181.  “SUCH RATIONALE CONTINUES TO BE SOUND.” 

They are to make every effort to investigate thoroughly by NOT erroneously denying a continuance, but are instead to grant a continuance more readily in order to create a complete record, so that they can be, “GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT ITS ERRORS AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE.” How can they correct their errors, if they dismiss due process and send the unsatisfied party into a higher appeals arena, still trying to receive correction on a fundamental error made at the referee level? Or repeated at the UCBR level?  

The SEQUENCUAL PIECEMEALING OF ADJUDICATIONS, is the error of forming a denial based on one issue, where a second issue forbids denial. This case has not been thoroughly investigated, assembled into a complete record or judicially resolved, whatsoever, and cannot avoid being remanded or reversed for violation of due process. 

 

 

 

 

 

IE: A claimant, absent at a hearing, is denied a continuance and is claiming that there was not fair and equal opportunity to present equal testimony into the written record, which served as the basis for evaluating the merit according to available information. The UCBR upheld the referee’s denial of benefits, stating that the claimant was absent and did not give “proper cause” for the absence and was already afforded the opportunity for a fair hearing. –ISSUE #1 

IE: The same claimant, absent at the hearing where there is a charge of willful misconduct, and the employer did not satisfy the Burden of Proof, for willful misconduct. A continuance, affording further testimony and evidence are refused, because the claimant was absent and was already afforded the opportunity for a fair hearing, then the UCBR is repeating the error of the referee in forming a denial based on ONE issue where another issue, willful misconduct ISSUE #2, forbids denial. 

They cannot deny benefits because a claimant was absent at a hearing. The absence is issue #one and absence is not an acceptable reason to deny benefits. The issue #TWO compounds the error, with the evidence that the employer never satisfied the Burden of Proof with testimony on the willful misconduct charge. This is a SECOND issue that forbids the denial of benefits “where the employer has not proven willful misconduct”. 

These are examples of exactly what the Supreme Court was referring to when it advised the UCBR to, “DISCARD THE DOCTRINE”. 

The UCBR did in fact attempt to violate the findings of the Supreme Court and present a, SEQUENCE OF PIECEMEAL ADJUDICATIONS, in denying on ISSUE #1 and neglecting on ISSUE #2. The UCBR neglected to consider the sworn testimony of the employer’s witness, who under oath, denied that the reason for termination was willful misconduct. 

The claimant was absent from the hearing, so a denial of benefits was upheld, by the UCBR, and the failure of the employer to prove willful misconduct was neglected and permitted to be buried below the absence issue even though it is forbidden to be present in a denial decision. 

The Supreme Court already determined that these UCBR policies and procedures and dismissals and denials are violations of Fundamental Rights and advised that these doctrines be discarded in 1981. 

 

 

 

 

 

Therefore, in every instance since 1981, where the UCBR has upheld a denial for benefits and has denied a request for continuance, due to the absence of a claimant, in a willful misconduct setting, even where the “Burden Of Proof” of willful misconduct, in the full definition as judicially defined, was not satisfied by the employer, they have been in violation of a Supreme Court decision and advisement, to void these policies (DISCARD THE DOCTRINE) THAT INHIBIT THE REQUIREMENT THAT THEY DEVELOP COMPLETE RECORDS AND ADVANCE ALL LEGAL THEORIES.

 

 

 TO SUMMARIZE:

They CANNOT refuse a continuance due to absence from the original hearing,

They CANNOT refuse written testimony, from an absent party, to be accepted into the record, if they have accepted it from the opposing party, for evaluation before a final decision,

They CANNOT uphold an adverse decision, in a willful misconduct setting, where the “burden of proof” was not satisfied,

They CANNOT refuse or uphold a refusal for continuance, where an absent party has had NO opportunity to give ANY testimony, neither written or verbal,

They CANNOT repeatedly refuse to re-open cases or accept additional evidence, merely due to the objection of a re-opening, by the opponent, where the opponent’s objection would be obstructing the right to due process if the objection is not over-ruled and the request is not granted.

 

These conclusions are NOT open for discussion or dispute. They have already BEEN decided by the SUPREME COURT.

Also, accepting that we cannot enable the possibility of blatant disregard of a Notice of Hearing, we must also consider that an absence, although entitled to present written testimony to be evaluated before a final decision, does already carry a consequence, in that the absent party is not able to witness the proceedings and is therefore, unable to cross-examine or rebut during the hearing. 

They do not become aware of testimony presented unless they request transcripts and records of the hearing, which are to be made available with the absence of either party, in order to prepare an appeal, and they should be informed of this availability. If they have testimony and evidence to present, that would be relevant to the decision, they suffer a delay in the opportunity for rebuttal, but a continuance and that opportunity for rebuttal is required by Law.

Any policies proposed by the UCBR and approved as amendments to PA Codes and Statutes must meet the criteria test of consistency; that “CERTAIN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE HONORED, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DUE PROCESS OF LAW.”. 

Violation of this obligation is now verified by the Commonwealth Court and the supremacy of its opinion over the policies of the UCBR, plus the support of those just opinions by the Supreme Court, will nullify the standing, credibility and acceptance of these policies, as arguments that would DISREGARD the decision by the Supreme Court, if they do not pass the criteria test of consistency to Basic and Fundamental rights, as already demanded and clarified by the Supreme Court, and now I must request that it also be supported, reiterated and upheld by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.                                                                    (end of addendum) 

 

AUTHOR: DAWN NARET’

2-28-07 author update: Current Contact Info:

Dawn Naret’

P.O.Box 2315, Pittsburgh, Pa. 15230-2315

Email: reply2dn@gmail.com  OR   dawnaret@yahoo.co.uk

Blogsites: http://www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com

                  http://www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com

   

<div align=”center”><script language=”JavaScript” src=”http://www.tech-counter.com/techcount.php?page=http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com&style=LED_g&digits=6″ mce_src=”http://www.tech-counter.com/techcount.php?page=http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com&style=LED_g&digits=6″ type=”text/javascript”><!–

   //–></script><br /><a href=”http://www.nyplasticsurg.com” mce_href=”http://www.nyplasticsurg.com”>gynecomastia</a></div>

  

NARET’ V. UCBR (2004) DOCKET NO. 1742 CD 2004

       

11/29/04 REPLY FROM APPELLANT TO:

11/24/04 RESPONSE FROM UCBR TO PETITIONER’S 11/8/04 MOTION TO REMAND OR REVERSE WITH PREJUDICE

    

AND

    

OPPOSITION TO: 11/24/04 MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONER’S APPEAL FILED BY UCBR

    

 

       

APPELLANT IS FILING AN AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO THE 11/24/04 MOTION, BY UCBR, TO DISMISS PETITIONER’S APPEAL

       

APPEAL TO:

    

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CASE DOCKET NO. 1742 CD 2004

    

DAWN NARET’, ATTORNEY, PRO SE,

APPELLANT

    

VS.

    

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT

             

NARET’ V. UCBR (2004) NO. 1742 CD 2004 (CONT’D)

       

APPELLANT, DAWN NARET’, ATTORNEY PRO SE, FILES THIS

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONER’S APPEAL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

    

(The reply number will correspond to the response line it is replying to as much as possible)

    

1. The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (hereafter referred to as the UCBR) filed this 11/24/04 Motion to Dismiss as a response to the 11/8/04 9 page Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice and 7page Addendum, filed by the appellant (petitioner). The arguments and legal citings in the appellant’s combined 16 page Motion, with its Addendum, presented undebatable evidence that conduct and procedure were repeatedly in error in this case, since the initial filing of an appeal against the decision of eligibility, made by the Department of Unemployment Compensation. Their initial, correct decision was based on the fact that the employer denied willful misconduct on the initial fact-finding inquiry and repeated that denial, in the dialog of the transcripts, as specified in the appellants Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice/plus Addendum. They were essentially appealing the initial employer’s own testimony or to clarify, disputing with themselves, which once testified, cannot be revoked or appealed by the party that testified, and definitely should not be given a scheduled appeal hearing date, because that would unacceptably inflate the hearings calendar.

          

2. On July 21, 2004, the UCBR defaulted procedure by adopting the illegal decision, by the referee. It is illegal to deny UC Benefits, where the employer failed to prove willful misconduct, and clearly stated, in the transcripts, that the ALLEGED offense was a Category II, which is the “LESS SERIOUS” Category.

3. On October 8, appellant met the timely deadline of October 12, 2004, for filing brief, in spite of the UCBR’s failure to respond with a timely submittal of all hearing records. Brief was hand-written.

4. On October 12, 2004, the prothonotary’s office rejected the brief, for form, and set a new deadline of November 12, 2004. Appellant made every effort to encourage expedition of the forwarding of requested records but had only a portion of them forwarded on October 26, 2004, through the kind intervention of Gerard Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Counsel for the UCBR. On November 3, 2003, a 4 th written request demanding the complete record, including ” documents #1 through #31″, that were mentioned on page 2 of the transcripts. None of the documents were forwarded even to date. Appellant then had no alternative but to file a timely 9page Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice plus a 7 page Addendum to the Motion on November 8, 2004, due to lack of UCBR’S cooperation in forwarding all records. This also nullified the new deadline of November 12, 2004 for filing a brief, according to the FEDERAL Rules of Appellate Procedure on Motion to Remand: “The motion shall be filed prior to the filing of the appellant’s brief.” – Rule 23B Section (A) paragraph 2. And may I also cite Rule 23B Section (D), “Oral argument and the deadline for brief shall be VACATED upon the filing of a Motion to Remand under this rule.”.

    

It has frequently become apparent that the UCBR operates under a misconception of the extent of their own autonomy, in policymaking, as well as policy following, that has often revealed them to be non-compliant to the superior policies and authorities of the laws, policies and procedures of the Commonwealth Court, The UC Laws and the Federal Superior Court Procedures, THAT THEY ARE ALSO SUBORDINATE TO, in their UPWARD ASSIGNING OF APPELLANT DISPUTES. These higher authorities cannot and will not abide by the non-compliant policymaking practices of the UCBR, WHERE DUE PROCESS WOULD BE VIOLATED IF NON-COMPLIANT UCBR POLICIES WERE PERMITTED TO OVER-RIDE THE HIGHER AUTHORITIES THAT HOLD SUPREMANCY OVER THEIR DEPARTMENT.

5. The UCBR, on Item #5 of their Motion to dismiss, incorrectly implies that the appellant has not complied with proper requirements of Chapter 21 of the Pa Rules of Appellate Procedure. The fact is, the appellant was exactly correct in timely functions and form, and the UCBR has attempted to persuade this court to overlook the filing of the combined 16 page Motion to Reverse, with all of its defaults documented, and its vacating of the brief deadline.

                      

Therefore it is the UCBR who is not complying, due to their inappropriate filing for a Motion to Dismiss the Petitioner’s Appeal instead of complying with the procedure of response to the Motion to Remand;

“A response shall be filed within 20 days after the motion is filed. The response shall include a proposed order of remand that identifies the ineffectiveness claims and specifies the factual issues relevant to EACH such claim to be addressed by the trial court in the event Remand is granted, unless the responding party accepts that proposed by the moving party. Any reply shall be filed within 10 days after the response is filed.” – Rule 23B Section (B) Paragraph 2.

    

6. UCBR: ” On October 25, 2004, Petitioner requested the Board forward the hearing transcript of the employer’s testimony from the hearing of April 21, 2004.”

REPLY: Prior to the July 21, 2004 decision, by the UCBR, a telephone request for records was made. On July 29, 2004 a written request for ALL RECORDS was delivered and no response was received. By the deadline of October 12, 2004, Brief had to be submitted and compiled without the full record of the hearing, which was imperative to its efficient completion. This is a serious default, as cited, with references, in the Appellants Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice/ Plus Addendum. On October 25, 2004, Appellant submitted the THIRD not FIRST request for all records.

             

7. On October 26, 2004, a prompt response was made to the third request by, Gerard Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Counsel, as stated in reply item #4 of this document, but he only forwarded a copy of the transcript and 1 exhibit of the employer (the only exhibit of the employer, according to the transcript.) On page 2 of the transcript was dialog referring to documents #1 through #31 being entered into the record. Discussion of this was expanded in the appellants Motion to Reverse. None of these documents were ever forwarded and they held significance because they were already present, in the file, before the employer arrived and were not delivered by her, quoted from or mentioned by her during her testimony, as evidenced in the transcripts.

On November 3, 2004 a FOURTH request was submitted to the UCBR, with a time is of the essence status, pending the November 12, 2004 deadline for brief. NONE was received. UCBR DEFAULTED, again, in neglecting to make a timely response to requests for ALL RECORDS.

8. UCBR: “ON or about November 12, 2004, Petitioner filed a Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice (Motion) with this court, purportedly requesting a remand or reversal due to lack of timely release of records that are imperative to the preparation of her brief.”

REPLY: The FACT is; on November 8, 2004, NOT November 12, 2004, appellant had still received NO RESPONSE to the FOURTH request for ALL RECORDS. This was not a “purported” default but a serious obstruction to the efficient preparation of brief. The absence of a timely response, for the forwarding of the required documents, prompted the November 8, 2004, filing of the 9 page Motion of Remand or Reversal with Prejudice.

On November 10, 2004, appellant also filed a 7 page Addendum to that motion, providing a combined total of a 16 page Motion that revealed a wider view of the tragedy and proportionate number of victims that are being made homeless and losing entire households of possessions and property, due to these procedural spans, defaults and delays. If appeals are not resolved and UC Funds delivered to the claimants within 30 days, the claimant is vulnerable to an eviction on rental property, and if not resolved and delivered within 90 days, to a home-owner, they are facing mortgage foreclosure.

The staff of UCBR, as well as this honorable court must open their eyes; to the massive crisis the UCBR is creating by erroneously and illegally denying UC Benefits. By the UCBR’S own admission, they deny 100 to 200 appeals PER DAY.

That’s 24,000 to 48,000 victims PER YEAR, that they are responsible for, by imposing on them, the vulnerability of having their only source of income cut off and becoming homeless!

The UCBR has not been complying with the purpose it was created for. It is responsible to; investigate, correct and resolve errors as quickly as possible by using all the non-prejudice evaluating processes, that are fair and just and legal according to all Federal Civil Rights Laws, Pa State Laws, UC Department Laws, and UCBR Tribunal policies, that are recognized as acceptable within their own department, as well as beyond themselves, to the superior authorities, that they are also obligated to be compliant with, in their policymaking and practices.

       

 

The referees are over-burdened with appeals from employers who are hiring profit service-contract companies to appeal EVERY single ELIGIBLE Determination. These companies MUST be removed from the arena, as they have no association as legal counsel or acceptable witnesses who can present testimony or evidence. I expounded on this, in more detail, in the Motion to Reverse. I sympathize with the staff of the UC Department, including the referees and the Tribunal. But the over-load they are burdened with, they have created themselves, by giving hearing scheduling to frivolous appeals that are being made, in order that the employer can avoid payment as required, to the State UC Fund. These problems cannot be resolved by prejudicing the claimants, by denying benefits, where no willful misconduct has been claimed by the employer in the initial fact-finding inquiry, just to expedite the over-load of cases out the door, where it was not the fault of the claimant that they were over-loaded and where the staff from the UC Department already determined them as ELIGIBLE. Why would they schedule a hearing for an appeal where the employer already denied willful misconduct in the initial fact-finding inquiry? They shoot themselves in the foot and create the over-load by permitting the unpermittable. The employer cannot waste the referee’s time or put the UC Benefits of the claimant in question for the purpose of appealing his own initial testimony.

If the UCBR developed non-prejudice policies and procedure, supervised and followed-up on the decisions of the referees, the caseload of error, coming to them, would be drastically reduced, just by having the referee abide by the non-prejudice policies that must conform to the right of due process and the right to a fair hearing.

Their reluctance to grant continuances, to avail claimants the fair opportunity to completely voice all their testimony and present evidence, is causing the incompleteness that results in upward assigning and continuance, where the claimants are not receiving due process from the referee decisions. They CANNOT refuse continuances to claimants because too many employers have jammed their calendar with frivolous appeals. They pacify the request of the employer but not the claimant. This is clearly prejudice. They are devaluating the claimant and minimalizing the importance of their Civil Rights, their Right to a Fair Hearing and the importance and relevance of their testimony.

10. UCBR: (these statements are a perfect example, of the practice, of shoving the priorities and defaults under the rug and attempting to slide the testimony, of the claimant, out the door before anyone chances to hear or pay attention to them) Quote item # 10 in portions; ” To the extent the court considers Petitioner’s Motion and Addendum to be her amended Brief, these lack a statement of the scope of review and standard of review, statement of the questions involved, summary of argument, argument and conclusion…. Wherefore , Petitioner, having failed to comply with this court’s order, dated October 12, 2004, to file an amended Brief…… and the petitioner’s Motion and Addendum being non-responsive ….(???)…..Respondent moves that your honorable Court dismiss Petitioner’s appeal…..Wherefore, petitioner, having failed to state grounds upon which relief can be granted……. (???)….and Respondent, having complied with the Petitioner’s request for a copy of the referee’s hearing transcripts of April 21, 2004, Respondent moves that your honorable Court deny Petitioner’s Motion and Addendum…..”.

REPLY: the UCBR has clearly resorted to false statements, incorrect information and non-compliance with procedure. Also, in the attempt to over-step and erase the defaults proven in the appellant’s Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice/ plus Addendum, Respondent has failed to give any viable explaination or retort to several documented issues, including the employers initial fact-finding statements and their transcribed hearing testimony, that willful misconduct was NOT the reason for termination, the missing 34 page letter of request for reconsideration that was not appended to the record and possibly more missing material of testimony, presented by the appellant, or they would not consider that these blatent false statements could be found believable if ALL the evidence and testimony are available for evaluation. “Wherefore, Petitioner, having failed to state grounds upon which relief can be granted…..” Where are the pages listing all this material if this Respondent believes they have not been presented? It is obviously a rouse to avoid admitting that serious mistakes were made and Immediate Reversal of their Illegal Decisions can be the only recourse possible for this Honorable Court to proceed with, having in its philosophies founded on a more ethical standard of practices than these being resorted to by the Respondent. Therefore, the Appellant moves that this honorable and ethical Court deny the Respondents Motion to Dismiss the Petitioner’s Appeal, and further moves that the Appellant be granted an immediate reversal of all decisions that denied UC Benefits with prejudice.

             

In conclusion, UCBR counsel, having the disadvantage of arriving late in these proceedings, and to be liberal, may not have been privy to the entire record of testimony and the chronology of evidence presented by the Appellant, is unfortunately lacking an awareness and insight of the urgency of the need for immediate Reversal and disbursement of UC Funds to legally ELIGIBLE claimants. Please review the list of 17 personal tragedies that are suffered within 30 days of a referee’s denial, listed on page 6 of the Appellants Motion to Reverse.

This is not a time to “save face”, but an opportunity to “man up” and admit honorably that errors have been discovered, many victims have been left homeless, many lives are being destroyed by these merry-go-round delay tactics and policies. Yes, the claimants do eventually go away and leave you alone. They are forced to leave the state, those who survive alive. But these were never the stereotypical images you are holding of hoboes who are too lazy to work. These are people who have worked hard all their lives. Some have degrees, own their own homes and serve on community boards. These are people who were employed full-time, very recently. But in an alarming number of cases, they have been unjustly severed from the workplace through a common practice of deception, slander and framing innocent employees in order to dishonestly lay the groundwork for false statements of “just cause” for termination in order that the employer might avoid UC Benefits payments. These are people who have even been more adept and efficient at doing their job than their supervisors and were viewed as a threat. Therefore the groundwork is laid down to get rid of them “with just cause”.

They never deserved to loose their jobs, and now you impose on them homelessness, starvation, banishment and possibly death.

Read my lips. A State, a city, a country cannot survive the budgets required when there are no citizens paying taxes or having consumable income. Everyone and everything is affected by negative, unethical, uncaring, uncompromising policies and practices that would obstruct consumable incomes to the citizens. These are good people being abused.

       

Please STOP THE ABUSE.

       

Thank you,

Dawn Naret’

Current Contact Info:

P.O. Box 2315 Pittsburgh, Pa 15230-2315

reply2dn@gmail.com

dawnaret@yahoo.co.uk

 

(Old Original Contact Info-see below):

Dawn Naret’

P.O. Box 643

Lancaster, Pa. 17608 (no phone anymore – dependant on free Library computer access)

dawn_naret@emailaccount.com

dawn_naret@yahoo.com

    

<div align=”center”><script language=”JavaScript” src=”http://www.tech-counter.com/techcount.php?page=http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com&style=LED_g&digits=6″ mce_src=”http://www.tech-counter.com/techcount.php?page=http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com&style=LED_g&digits=6″ type=”text/javascript”><!–

   //–></script><br /><a href=”http://www.nyplasticsurg.com” mce_href=”http://www.nyplasticsurg.com”>gynecomastia</a></div>

  

LETTER TO MACAREVICH, ATTY FOR PA STATE:

 

Dawn M. Naret’

P.O. Box 643

Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17608

(717) 394-2171

  

Gerard Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Counsel

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

10th floor Labor and Industry Bldg.

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120

November 14, 2004

  

Deputy Mackarevich,

On October 25, 2004, I sent a repeat request for records on case no. 1742 CD 2004. You very kindly and very promptly intervened and responded to that request in the absence of Clifford Blaze, Esquire, but you did not send me ALL the records.

Unfortunately, I have reached an end of available waiting time and have submitted a Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice (you’re welcome J) to the Commonwealth Court of Pa, on November 10, 2004.

I also attempted to send you a copy of the correspondence, for Certificate of Service, since I have not been informed of exactly whom, if not yourself, is assuming full duties of the absent Attorney Blaze.

The mailing was returned to me, with refusal to forward it to you. I then faxed it to your fax number listed on your letterhead.

Today, I am mailing you a copy of an Addendum to that Motion. I chose to expand on some dialog.

Again, I thank you, very much, for your intervention and assistance in bringing this case to a long over-due completion.

    

Regards,

   

Dawn M. Naret’

    

LETTER TO PROTHONOTARY:

 

Dawn Naret’, Attorney, Pro Se

P.O. Box 643

Lancaster, Pa 17608-0643

Commonwealth Court of Pa.

Office of the Prothonotary

Irvis Office Bldg. – Rm. 624

Harrisburg, Pa 17120

Atten: Mr. Daniel R. Schuckers, Esquire

Regarding: Appellants 11/8/04 Motion to Remand or reverse with Prejudice and 11/10/04 Addendum to be appended to that Motion.

CASE: Dawn Naret’ v. UCBR

No. 1742 CD 2004

11/29/04

Dear Mr. Schuckers,

I was awaiting a response, from the UCBR office, within the required 20 days, to the Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice, filed by me 11/8/04, (prior to the 11/12/04 dead-line for brief submission).

What I received is a partial response to only a few items of contention that prompted the Motion. I can only be liberal to the UCBR and assume that they have given a timely response to that Motion with their 11/24/04 communication, stated in the form of a request for Motion to Dismiss the Appeal of the Petitioner. (???)

It is an unusual response, considering the evidence presented in the Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice/plus Addendum. I am very certain that a dismissal would be, without a doubt, a very serious violation of all laws, codes and procedures that they are obligated to comply with.

Their denial of Due Process was one of the contentious issues and the illegal denial of benefits, where willful misconduct was not proven or stated by the employer, relegate this case beyond the possibility of legal dismissal.

Therefore, I am submitting an OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONER’S APPEAL and also requesting that the justification of this opposition be summarized in my permissible REPLY TO THEIR RESPONSE, as I am submitting it within the required 10 days and I am willing, as I said, to be liberal as to the venue of their 11/24/04 communication.

  

I hold no negative opinions toward any of the staff currently focusing on this case. I am fully aware of the difficulties they have encountered with staff replacements and various other cogs in the wheel.

I consider myself fortunate that Mr. Gerard Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Counsel and Ms. Janet M. Tarczy, Assistant Counsel, should have been willing to come in on this problem situation at such a late date.

I have addressed the Certificate of Service to both or either Mr. Mackarevich or Ms. Tarczy, since I have not been told whom to consider the official replacement of Attorney Clifford Blaze, who left in August 2004.

There has been, repeated lack of communication as well as misinformation that created an unfair tragedy including now; eviction and homelessness, due to the illegal withholding of UC benefit funds.

Because of the situation advancing to such an intensely serious miscarriage of justice, I must beg your compassion and assistance in expediting the reversal and release of UC funds immediately. I have no phone either, and cannot continue to accomplish these necessary clerical communications and requirements.

It is not an incompetence on my part, it is an injustice that I should be required to suffer through so much difficulty to receive what I am already entitled to and was already approved for, before the referee erred in her judgment and knowledge of the UC Law.

I can be contacted by e-mail at:

Dawn_naret@emailaccount.com or

Dawn_naret@yahoo.com

   

Thank you and regards,

    

Dawn Naret’

P.O. Box 643

Lancaster, Pa 17608

(No phone no.)

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

TO GOV. ED RENDEL: “TRASH THE COMIES CLYDE ! ! ” – (IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT US TO FEEL?)

•August 9, 2008 • 3 Comments

Thursday, June 12, 2008

GOV. ED RENDELL

GOV. ED RENDELL

 

 

 

 *******************************************************************

PENNSYLVANIA’S “COMMUNIST STATE” LAWMAKERS SIGN LURE OF “WE JUST WANTED TO SEE WHO YOU SERVE” – TRASH THE COMMIES CLYDE !

********************************************************************

 

 

 

 
*******************************************************************
“THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE WAS THE PROMISE,THE CONSTITUTION WAS THE FULFILLMENT”…………

“The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for, among old parchments, or musty records.

They are written, as with a sun beam in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can NEVER be erased OR obscured by mortal power.”

Alexander Hamilton, 1775

**********************************************************************************

“EQUAL” – NOT “MAJORITY” OR “FAVORED” – BUT ALL-L-L-L THE PEOPLE “EQUALLY” ARE PROTECTED AND SERVED. -

“YOU ARE NOT A “LOYAL AMERICAN”, BY VOTING FOR SMOKING BANS OR ANY OTHER BAN THAT WOULD INFRINGE ON THE RIGHT OF DEMOCRACY, FREE CHOICE OR THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF “ALL”……..

“YOU ARE ONLY A “LOYAL AMERICAN”, IF YOU STAND YOUR GROUND AND PROTECT THE FREEDOMS, GUARANTEED TO “ALL”, BY THE CONSTUTUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, WHETHER IT IS YOUR PERSONAL PREFERENCE OR NOT. IF YOU DON’T PROTECT DEMOCRACY FOR “THEM….IT MAY BE ERASED FOR “YOU” AS WELL……”

YOU HAVE CERTAIN FREEDOMS AND CHOICES, WHEN YOU OPEN A PUBLIC BUILDING OR A PUBLIC BUSINESS….BUT IT IS NOT YOUR PRIVATE RESIDENCE, IT IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC…..AND ONCE OPENED TO THE PUBLIC, IT MUST SERVE AND WELCOME “ALL” OF THE PUBLIC, WITHOUT DISCRIMINATION…… DAWN NARET’

*************************************************************************

( A FULL COPY OF THIS COMMENTARY, INCLUDING A COPY OF “SMOKING BANS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL” AND “TO THE VOLUNTEER: ‘SMOKE FREE AMERICA’ KIDS….I’D LOVE TO WORK WITH YOU, BUT YOU ARE TOO DARN PREJUDICE….”, ALSO INCLUDING THE CLOSING PERSONAL NOTE TO GOVENOR ED RENDELL HAS BEEN POSTED AT:

http://blogs.tampabay.com/buzz/2008/06/ed-rendell-head.html?cid=118589590#comment-118589590

(http://blogs.tampabay.com (CLICK “THE BUZZ” LOOK FOR ED RENDELL ARTICLE AND CLICK “READ COMMENTS” JUNE 12)

ALSO AT: http://sites.state.pa.us/PA_Exec/Governor/govmail.html
(GOVENOR ED RENDELL’S WEB SITE)

COMING ASAP, A FULL EXPOSE’ ON THIS LIST OF ISSUES AND CURRENT VIOLATIONS TO DEMOCRACY AND OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS :

1. JUST HOW TO TEAR APART THE RHETORIC AND REVEAL THE TRUE ULTERIOR MOTIVES OF “SMOKE FREE AMERICA” AND SIMILAR GROUPS, CONCERNED WITH SMOKING AND ALSO CONCERNED WITH THE MIRIAD OF OTHER ISSUES THEY USE AS A MEANS TO INFILTRATE GOVERNMENT AND LEGISLATE EXCUSES TO DIVIDE AND CONQUER, INTIMIDATE, TERRORIZE, ERASE DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOM AND ENSLAVE AMERICAN CITIZENS

2. ERASING EQUAL RIGHTS

3. ERASING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

4. ERASING PERSONAL CHOICE CIVIL RIGHTS

5. ERASING THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION GIVEN TO PORNOGROPHY AND PORNO SHOPS, BY SETTING SMOKERS AS THE FIRST TESTING AREANA ON HOW TO “BLOW OFF AND ERASE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS OF EQUAL RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF CHOICE

6. REVEALING THEIR DESIRE TO HARRASS CITIZENS

7. REVEALING THEIR DESIRE TO INCRIMINATE CITIZENS (A POLICE RECORD FOR SMOKING ?)

8. REVEALING THEIR DESIRE TO SEIZE CHILDREN OF U.S. CITIZENS

9. REVEALING THE LIES OF “WE JUST WANT TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC”

10. REVEALING THEIR DESIRE TO CREATE STRESS TO SMOKERS

11. REVEALING THEIR OBVIOUS DENIAL THAT SMOKING, OUT SIDE, IN FREEZING, RAINING, INCLIMATE WEATHER AND BEING SUBJECTED TO “IMMEDIATE” PNEUMONIA, ASTHMA FROM POISONOUS EXAUST FUMES OR BACTERIAL INFECTIONS, ACQUIRED NEXT TO THE TRASH BINS, ARE NOT SERIOUS ENOUGH CONCERNS FOR EQUAL PROTECTION FOR THE HEALTH OF SMOKERS, BUT A VAGUE POSSIBLE LONG-TERM CHANCE OF DEVELOPING ILLNESS, IN A NON-SMOKER EXPOSED TO SECOND-HAND SMOKE, IS THE ONLY PRIORITY AND DESERVES THE RIGHT TO ERASE EQUAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS FOR SMOKERS

12. REVEALS THAT SMOKERS NEVER WANTED OR DESERVED TO HAVE DANGEROUS CHEMICALS OR CARCINOGENS PUT INTO THEIR CONSUMABLE TOBACCO PRODUCTS

13. WHY HAVE THEY NOT FORBADE DANGEROUS CHEMICALS AND CARCINOGENS, THAT ARE THE SOURSE OF SECOND HAND SMOKE, FROM BEING ADDED INTO THE CLEAN, NON-HARMFUL TOBACCO OF A “CONSUMABLE PRODUCT”, THAT IS INHALED AND ENTERS THE BODY AND IS UNDER PROTECTION OF “CONSUMABLE PRODUCT RESTRICTIONS” INSPECTED BY THE FDA

14. REVEALING WHY THE FDA THINKS CARCINOGENS ARE OK FOR SMOKERS

15. REVEALING WHY THIS LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL, GLOBAL MOVEMENT HAS NEVER – ANYWHERE – IN ANY COUNTRY THAT IS IS PROMOTED – OR ANY REGION THAT IT HAS INFILTRATED, PLACED THE FOCUS OF A SOLUTION FOR THE DANGERS OF “SECOND HAND SMOKE” ONTO THE MANUFACTURER, AND NOT ONTO THE INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN WITH A SHOW OF CONCERN FOR:

LOSS OF PERSONAL CHOICE, EQUAL RIGHTS, GENUINE CONCERN FOR THE HEALTH OF SMOKERS, SINCERE POLITICAL EFFORT TO FIND A FAIR AND EFFICIENT SOLUTION THAT WILL NOT ERASE DEMOCRACY, FREEDOMS OR INCONVENIENCING CITIZENS OR DIVIDING CITIZENS, AGAINST EACH OTHER OR CAUSE NEGATIVITY BETWEEN GROUPS NOR HAS IT EVER CEASED, AT ANY LEVEL, OF CONTINUED RAIL ROADING PROGRESSION, WITH AN INSATIABLE LUST FOR:

MORE…MORE…MORE…RESTRICTION, CONFINING OF CHOICE, HARRASSMENT OF CITIZENS, CRIMINALIZATION OF CITIZENS (NOW HAVE A POLICE RECORD FOR SMOKING ?), FROM PUSHING FOR SEPARATE SMOKE SECTIONS TO SEPARATE SMOKE ROOMS, TO OUT SIDE THE BUILDING, TO 10 FEET FROM THE BUILDING, TO 20 FEET FROM THE BUILDING…..IT IS NEVER SATISFIED, TO CASH FINES, TO JAIL TERMS, TO SEIZING CHILDREN OF VIOLATORS….IT NEVER STOPS ! !

16. REVEALING HOW THIS GLOBAL ANTI-DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT USES EACH SINGLE ISSUE, SUCH AS SMOKING, AS A JUMPING BOARD TO TAKE OVER GOVERNMENTS AND ERASE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY.

17. REVEALING THE STEADY, INCREASING, EVIDENCES OF THE COUNTRY’S INADEQUATE AWARENESS AND IGNORANT GANG-MENTALITY OF ACCEPTANCE, FOR LEGALIZING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST SMOKERS IN JOBS, SOCIAL BANISHMENTS, PARENTING AND HOUSING.

**NOTE TO GOVENOR ED RENDELL JUNE 12,2008 FROM DAWN NARET’, PITTSBURGH, PA

YOUR NUMBER IS UP GOVENOR. ARE YOU MAN ENOUGH TO EVALUATE, WITH INTELLIGENCE AND A SINCERE DESIRE TO BE AN HONORABLE REPRESENTATIVE OF “ALL” THE PEOPLE?

THERE IS NO WAY YOU CAN READ THIS LIST OF VIABLE THE COMPLAINTS, WARNINGS AND VICTIMIZATION, OF ALL SMOKERS, AND TRY TO CONTINUE THE DECEPTIVE FACADE, THAT YOU ARE SIMPLY INTERESTED IN DOING SOMETHING NICE AND HEALTHFUL FOR THE PEOPLE.

YOU ARE A SERVANT OF “ALL” THE PEOPLE. NOT JUST THOSE YOU CHOOSE TO FAVOR AND SOCIALIZE WITH.

THIS IS A COUNTRY “OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE….”.

THE “GOVERNMENT” IS NOT AN ENTITY OF AUTHORITY, IN OR OF ITSELF, OVER THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

ANY LAW THAT DOES NOT PROTECT “ALL” THE PEOPLE, CANNOT BE WRITTEN INTO LAW FOR “ANY” OF THE PEOPLE.

MAJORITY DOES NOT RULE WHEN IT COMES TO OKAYING THESE MANY VIOLATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS THAT YOU HAVE VOWED TO SUPPORT AND PASS INTO LAW.

YOU ARE STANDING AT A CROSS ROADS OF LOOKING INTO THE TRUTH OF WHO YOU ARE, WHAT YOU STAND FOR AND ARE YOU A LOYAL AMERICAN OR ARE YOU WILLING TO SELL THE FREEDOM AND RIGHTS OF EVERY CITIZEN DOWN THE RIVER FOR THE “BENEFIT AND EXPANSION OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY”?

YOU ARE THERE – MEPHESTAPHOLUS AWAITS YOUR CHOICE AND YOUR DECISION.

THANK YOU,

DAWN NARET, AUTHOR

(NOTE FROM DAWN: IF WE EVER GET A PERSONAL AND DIRECT RESPONSE, PERTINENT TO THE ISSUE…I WILL POST IT IMMED.)

JUNE 12, 2008 RESPONSE FROM GOVENOR ED RENDELL:

from “governor@state.pa.us” hide details 3:10 pm (0 minutes ago)
date Jun 12, 2008 3:10 PM
subject Automated Response from Pennsylvania Web Server.
mailed-by state.pa.us

Thank you for your interest in Pennsylvania state government. As your Governor, I am committed to working tirelessly to bring positive change to our Commonwealth, and appreciate your input.
If you are writing about a particular piece of legislation, your comments will be included as I consider each bill that reaches my desk. Each of your concerns is important to me, and will be distributed to the appropriate state agency after my review. Thank you again for sharing the thoughts and concerns that are important to you and your family.
By working together, we will improve the lives of all Pennsylvanians.
Sincerely,

Governor Edward G. Rendell

******************************************************************

WE ARE HOPEFUL ! ! CALL OFF CLYDE ! ....GOT A RESPONSE ! ....NO COMMIES HERE !

CALL OFF CLYDE ! ....GOT A RESPONSE ! ....NO COMMIES HERE !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**************************************************************************************

Posted by DAWN NARET’ at 8:07 AM 0 comments
Labels: COMMUNIST, CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, dawn naret, ED RENDEL, PA COMMUNISM, smoking bans

*******************************************************************************************

i HAVE ON-GOING PROBLEMS WITH TERRORISTS AND STALKERS, WHO STEAL MY WORK AND WILL NOT ALLOW THE FINISHED PROFESSIONAL LOOKING COPY TO BE VISIBLE, TO THE PUBLIC.

 

IT SEEMS THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO PROVE THAT EITHER I WAS NOT THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR, THAT I DID NOT HAVE ALL COPY RIGHTS ENTITLED, THAT I DO NOT KNOW HOW TO SELF-EDIT AND PUBLISH MY OWN WEB-SITES, OR THAT I AM OF QUESTIONABLE MENTAL STABILITY, AS AN ADDITIONAL SLANDERING DEVICE.

I HAVE POSTED A COMMENT TO MYSELF, JUST TO GET IT TO ARRIVE TO THEM. THE COMMENTS ARE OBSTRUCTED FROM BEING POSTED AT MY ORIGINAL SITE (WHICH THEY HACKED UP AND MADE A SHAMBLES OF), AND IF ANYONE COULD POST A COMMENT, IT HAS BEEN DIVERTED, ILLEGALLY TO ARRIVE AT ANOTHER SITE. THESE ARE ALL CRIMINAL ACTS THAT I WILL NOT WASTE MY TIME AT, IN A CIVIL SUIT….I WILL FILE A FORMAL COMPLAINT, TO A LOCAL MAGISTRATE, REQUESTING A WARRENT FOR THEIR ARREST !

BELOW IS A COPY OF THE COMMENT I LEFT. – THE REAL DAWN NARET’

Comments


  • Mr WordPress 2:37 pm on August 9, 2008 | # | e

    Hi, this is a comment.
    To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts’ comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.

Leave a Comment

HEY TERRORIZERS, STALKERS, DESTROYERS OF INTELLIGENT PROPERTY, IMPOSTERS, PLAIGERIZERS, TRESPASSERS,AND THIEVES……………. I NOW MADE HARD COPIES OF EVERYTHING I NEED TO PUT YOUR DEMON BUTTS IN JAIL………………. “PROOVE IT ! “…..YOU ALREADY DID IT FOR ME ! ! TRASH THE COMMIES CLYDE ! ! WE ARE MOST SERIOUS ABOUT THESE “ALREADY ON THE BOOKS” CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS THAT ONLY NEED TO BE SUBMITTED TO A MAGISTRATE, WITH A REQUEST FOR A WARRENT FOR YOUR ARREST…”THAT DAY” NOT YOU TIME BUT REAL TIME— I WANT YOU OUT OF EVERY SITE, THAT I OWN ON THE INTERNET… I WANT YOUR FRAUDULENT INITIALS AND EXCESSIVE, INEFFECIENT HTML, REMOVED FROM EVERY ONE OF MY ARTICLES I WANT THE ORIGINAL WELL ORGANIZED, TYPE SET AND COLORED ARTICLES RETURNED TO THEIR ORIGINNALY POSTED SITE I WANT ALL EMAILS AND COMMENTS, THAT YOU HAVE STOLEN FROM ME TO BE RETURNED, UNALTERED “PROVE IT !” ? YOU ALREADY DID IT FOR ME AND I HAVE HARD COPY EVIDENCE OF THEM AS WELL – THE REAL LEGAL, WITH PROVEN I.D., DAWN NARET’ AUG. 30 2008

HEY TERRORIZERS, STALKERS, DESTROYERS OF INTELLIGENT PROPERTY, IMPOSTERS, PLAIGERIZERS, TRESPASSERS,AND THIEVES…………….

 

I NOW MADE HARD COPIES OF EVERYTHING I NEED TO PUT YOUR DEMON BUTTS IN JAIL……………….

 

“PROOVE IT ! “…..YOU ALREADY DID IT FOR ME ! !

 

TRASH THE COMMIES CLYDE ! ! WE ARE MOST SERIOUS ABOUT THESE “ALREADY ON THE BOOKS” CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS THAT ONLY NEED TO BE SUBMITTED TO A MAGISTRATE, WITH A REQUEST FOR A WARRENT FOR YOUR ARREST…”THAT DAY” NOT YOU TIME BUT REAL TIME—

 

I WANT YOU OUT OF EVERY SITE, THAT I OWN ON THE INTERNET…

 

I WANT YOUR FRAUDULENT INITIALS AND EXCESSIVE, INEFFECIENT HTML, REMOVED FROM EVERY ONE OF MY ARTICLES

 

I WANT THE ORIGINAL WELL ORGANIZED, TYPE SET AND COLORED ARTICLES RETURNED TO THEIR ORIGINNALY POSTED SITE

 

I WANT ALL EMAILS AND COMMENTS, THAT YOU HAVE STOLEN FROM ME TO BE RETURNED, UNALTERED

 

“PROVE IT !” ? YOU ALREADY DID IT FOR ME AND I HAVE HARD COPY EVIDENCE OF THEM AS WELL – THE REAL LEGAL, WITH PROVEN I.D., DAWN NARET’ AUG. 30 2008